A cognitive mess: Mixed feelings about wind farms on the Danish coast and the emotions of energy infrastructure opposition
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 66, 101489, 01.08.2020.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A cognitive mess
T2 - Mixed feelings about wind farms on the Danish coast and the emotions of energy infrastructure opposition
AU - Upham, Paul
AU - Johansen, Katinka
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - The majority of local respondents in a large-scale survey were in favour of planned local wind farms on the Danish coast, despite these wind farm plans being the source of wider public and political contestation and opposition. Here we discuss results from the open-ended questions in the survey, specifically focusing on comments expressing how some respondents felt split in their views of these wind farms, accepting the need for renewable energy while at the same time being concerned about the potential local impact of the wind farms. Building on previous theoretical propositions relating to energy infrastructure opposition, here we apply the concept of cognitive polyphasia in some depth, providing a socio-cognitive account of the internal contradiction of being positively disposed to renewable energy in principle, but concerned about or opposed to specific developments in localities. We distinguish a cognitive polyphasic account of such mixed feelings from cognitive dissonance accounts, and we identify several types of polyphasic representations, providing a basis for further work in other cases.
AB - The majority of local respondents in a large-scale survey were in favour of planned local wind farms on the Danish coast, despite these wind farm plans being the source of wider public and political contestation and opposition. Here we discuss results from the open-ended questions in the survey, specifically focusing on comments expressing how some respondents felt split in their views of these wind farms, accepting the need for renewable energy while at the same time being concerned about the potential local impact of the wind farms. Building on previous theoretical propositions relating to energy infrastructure opposition, here we apply the concept of cognitive polyphasia in some depth, providing a socio-cognitive account of the internal contradiction of being positively disposed to renewable energy in principle, but concerned about or opposed to specific developments in localities. We distinguish a cognitive polyphasic account of such mixed feelings from cognitive dissonance accounts, and we identify several types of polyphasic representations, providing a basis for further work in other cases.
KW - Sustainability Governance
KW - Acceptance
KW - Cognitive polyphasia
KW - Nearshore wind
KW - Offshore wind
KW - Public objection
KW - Social representations
KW - Environmental Governance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084203654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101489
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101489
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85084203654
VL - 66
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
SN - 2214-6296
M1 - 101489
ER -