Wie entfalten Reallabore Wirkung für die Transformation? Eine embedded-agency perspective zur Analyse von Wirkmechanismen in Reallaboren

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

The central concern of real-world lab research is the inter- and transdisciplinary generation of socially robust transformation knowledge. Despite the fact that real-world labs explore and study fundamental mechanisms of change, there are few approaches that deal with this question from a systematic, theoretical and methodological perspective. Concrete real-world lab projects should be able to live up to their claim as a central research mode, supporting sustainability transformations. Thus, approaches are required that foster a broader understanding of mechanisms of change in real-world labs. We find promising approaches that describe mechanisms of change along discipline-specific analytical and empirical scales. Key challenges are to develop analytical frameworks that integrate such approaches from different disciplines, and to identify mechanisms of change in a systematic and comprehensive way. In this article we present an embedded-agency perspective for analysing mechanisms of change in real-world labs and discuss the methodological implications. With the help of this analytical framework, real-world lab processes can be designed in such a way that relevant data is collected and transformative impacts can be assessed.

Translated title of the contributionHow do real-world labs create impact for sustainability transformations? An embedded-agency perspective on analysing mechanisms of change in real-world labs
Original languageGerman
JournalGAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society
Volume31
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)207-214
Number of pages8
ISSN0940-5550
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31.12.2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgement: We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Funding: We gratefully acknowledge joint funding for parts of this work from the Robert Bosch foundation (Project: Towards an interdisciplinary understanding of scales and scaling in sustainability transitions [InterScale]). Paula Bögel also received funding for this project from the Volkswagen Foundation (Project: Dual-mode participation: Window of Opportunity for Inclusive Real-Worlds Labs). Karoline Augenstein and Meike Levin-Keitel received funding for parts of this project from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research as part of its Research for Sustainable Development Framework Program/ Social-Ecological Research (Projects: UrbanUp and MoveMe). The real-world experiment Your Balcony Network, that served as a case study, received funding from the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers (Project: Energy transformation in dialogue). Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Author contribution: KA, PMB and MLK jointly developed the analytical framework (embedded-agency perspective). They contributed their respective expertise in spatial analysis (MLK), socio-psychological analysis (PMB) and scaling/impact assessment in real-world lab research (KA). The empirical data of the illustrative case study were collected and evaluated by PMB and HT. All co-authors were involved in the preparation of the manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors; licensee oekom.

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Molinia caerulea responses to N and P fertilisation in a dry heathland ecosystem (NW-Germany)
  2. Combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in the treatment of mild to moderate major depression?
  3. „Die Literatur, das sind wir und unsere Feinde“
  4. Plant Community of the Year 2024
  5. The positive effect of plant diversity on soil carbon depends on climate
  6. Expert-based scenarios for strategic waste and resource management planning: C&D waste recycling in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
  7. Artful sustainability governance—Foundational considerations on sensory-informed policymaking for sustainable development
  8. Ausbildung zum Mobbing-Mediator
  9. Kreativität? Über das Schöpferische in Natur und Kunst
  10. Guter Gott - böser Gott?
  11. Bewegungsgefühl und Reitersitz
  12. Das Leben der Tiere. Zu Herders Hiobinterpretation
  13. Ursprung der Bilder
  14. Sprachunterricht in der Erwachsenenbildung
  15. Situationen der Gruppenvergewaltigung
  16. Deal or No Deal? Modelling the Impact of Brexit Uncertainty on UK Private Equity Activity
  17. Hospital effluents as a source of gadolinium in the aquatic environment
  18. The International legal framework for post-brexit eez fisheries access between the United Kingdom and the european union
  19. Biodegradable Magnesium Implants - How Do They Corrode in-vivo?
  20. Parteienfinanzierung
  21. Ab in die Mitte...?
  22. Beamte, Kirchen und Daseinsvorsorge – arbeitskampffreie Zonen?
  23. Reviewing Effective Contents for a Gamification Approach to Foster Wellbeing among Adolescents
  24. Namibia, Christianity in
  25. Blick(e) auf das schulisches Schreiben. Erste Ergebnisse aus IMOSS
  26. ‚Singt alle mit uns gemeinsam in dieser Minute’
  27. Wenn alle Kinder gottgeliebte Kunstschaffende sind!?
  28. §25 Klärgas
  29. Increase of large game species in Mediterranean areas: Is the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) facing a new threat?
  30. Leben gestalten lernen - Kompetenzen
  31. The role and benefits of population biological research for nature conservation monitoring
  32. ReClaiming Participation
  33. Kerstin Hensel
  34. Weibliche Selbständigkeit und ihre Erfolgsaussichten - defizitär oder einfach nur anders?
  35. Hochschule und Erlebnispädagogik
  36. Transdisziplinäre Forschung
  37. Altlastenverantwortlichkeit trotz Dereliktion
  38. The European Union’s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon
  39. Institutional ownership, environmental, social, and governance performance and disclosure
  40. Communal environmental protection and conservation