Why the Future Is (Still) Democratic

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Why the Future Is (Still) Democratic. / Welzel, Christian; Kruse, Stefan; Brunkert, Lennart.

In: Journal of Democracy, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.01.2022, p. 156-162.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Welzel C, Kruse S, Brunkert L. Why the Future Is (Still) Democratic. Journal of Democracy. 2022 Jan 1;33(1):156-162. doi: 10.1353/jod.2022.0011

Bibtex

@article{4b3aea747621452cb315a079f72c6893,
title = "Why the Future Is (Still) Democratic",
abstract = "Contradicting the oft-cited {"}deconsolidation thesis{"}—the notion of a worldwide decline in democratic support, especially among the young—we demonstrate that there is no global erosion of support for democracy, neither over time nor across generations. The global democratic-support trend is basically flat, with cyclical fluctuations between a very high and stable base level. More important, however, is a global generational shift from authoritarian values toward emancipative ones. Emancipative values tie democratic support increasingly tightly to liberal principles. Emancipative-values holders are more likely to resist attempts by autocrats or populists to deny or limit democratic freedoms. Slowly but steadily, this cultural undercurrent is shifting legitimacy from autocracy to democracy in most world regions. Democracy's future is bright.",
keywords = "Politics",
author = "Christian Welzel and Stefan Kruse and Lennart Brunkert",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/jod.2022.0011",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "156--162",
journal = "Journal of Democracy",
issn = "1045-5736",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins Univ. Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why the Future Is (Still) Democratic

AU - Welzel, Christian

AU - Kruse, Stefan

AU - Brunkert, Lennart

PY - 2022/1/1

Y1 - 2022/1/1

N2 - Contradicting the oft-cited "deconsolidation thesis"—the notion of a worldwide decline in democratic support, especially among the young—we demonstrate that there is no global erosion of support for democracy, neither over time nor across generations. The global democratic-support trend is basically flat, with cyclical fluctuations between a very high and stable base level. More important, however, is a global generational shift from authoritarian values toward emancipative ones. Emancipative values tie democratic support increasingly tightly to liberal principles. Emancipative-values holders are more likely to resist attempts by autocrats or populists to deny or limit democratic freedoms. Slowly but steadily, this cultural undercurrent is shifting legitimacy from autocracy to democracy in most world regions. Democracy's future is bright.

AB - Contradicting the oft-cited "deconsolidation thesis"—the notion of a worldwide decline in democratic support, especially among the young—we demonstrate that there is no global erosion of support for democracy, neither over time nor across generations. The global democratic-support trend is basically flat, with cyclical fluctuations between a very high and stable base level. More important, however, is a global generational shift from authoritarian values toward emancipative ones. Emancipative values tie democratic support increasingly tightly to liberal principles. Emancipative-values holders are more likely to resist attempts by autocrats or populists to deny or limit democratic freedoms. Slowly but steadily, this cultural undercurrent is shifting legitimacy from autocracy to democracy in most world regions. Democracy's future is bright.

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123180268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/92f654a1-3384-3cca-9bc4-40b1649df3d5/

U2 - 10.1353/jod.2022.0011

DO - 10.1353/jod.2022.0011

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85123180268

VL - 33

SP - 156

EP - 162

JO - Journal of Democracy

JF - Journal of Democracy

SN - 1045-5736

IS - 1

ER -

DOI