Why Notational Iconicity is a Form of Operational Iconicity
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Standard
Dimensions of Iconicity. ed. / Angelika Zirker; Matthias Bauer; Olga Fischer; Christina Ljungberg. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. p. 303-319 (Iconicity in Language and Literature; Vol. 15).
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Why Notational Iconicity is a Form of Operational Iconicity
AU - Krämer, Sybille
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 John Benjamins Publishing Company.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Something like a phonographic dogma dominates the theory of writing: writing is considered to be a fixed version of spoken language. This essay intends to overcome the speech-oriented concept of writing by conceptualizing the idea of ‘notational iconicity’. Being hybrids, written texts embody both, linguistic and iconic attributes. The decisive argument in favour of ‘notational iconicity’ is not only its visuality, but the two-dimensional spatiality and operativity of writing. This kind of operational iconicity is inherent to almost all written texts and is based on the fact that written texts materially and perceptively present themselves synoptically and simultaneously. Inscribed surfaces open up a neatly arranged and controllable space of aisthetic presentation and tactile manipulations: Every written configuration can be reconfigured; thus writing is a paper-tool, a laboratory for cognitive and aesthetic activities. At this point the connection between writing and other forms of graphical media like graphs and diagrams matters: The cultural technique of ‘flattening out’ constitutes an important strand in our media evolution, for communication as cognition, for composition as computation.
AB - Something like a phonographic dogma dominates the theory of writing: writing is considered to be a fixed version of spoken language. This essay intends to overcome the speech-oriented concept of writing by conceptualizing the idea of ‘notational iconicity’. Being hybrids, written texts embody both, linguistic and iconic attributes. The decisive argument in favour of ‘notational iconicity’ is not only its visuality, but the two-dimensional spatiality and operativity of writing. This kind of operational iconicity is inherent to almost all written texts and is based on the fact that written texts materially and perceptively present themselves synoptically and simultaneously. Inscribed surfaces open up a neatly arranged and controllable space of aisthetic presentation and tactile manipulations: Every written configuration can be reconfigured; thus writing is a paper-tool, a laboratory for cognitive and aesthetic activities. At this point the connection between writing and other forms of graphical media like graphs and diagrams matters: The cultural technique of ‘flattening out’ constitutes an important strand in our media evolution, for communication as cognition, for composition as computation.
KW - Philosophy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160125364&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1075/ill.15
DO - 10.1075/ill.15
M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies
SN - 978-90-272-4351-5
T3 - Iconicity in Language and Literature
SP - 303
EP - 319
BT - Dimensions of Iconicity
A2 - Zirker, Angelika
A2 - Bauer, Matthias
A2 - Fischer, Olga
A2 - Ljungberg, Christina
PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company
CY - Amsterdam
ER -