Validating the resource-management inventory (REMI): testing measurement invariance and predicting academic achievement in a sample of first-year university students

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Validating the resource-management inventory (REMI): testing measurement invariance and predicting academic achievement in a sample of first-year university students. / Waldeyer, Julia; Fleischer, Jens; Wirth, Joachim et al.
In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Vol. 36, No. 5, 09.2020, p. 777-786.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{dd176f2487934d20b55ab1896225d64b,
title = "Validating the resource-management inventory (REMI): testing measurement invariance and predicting academic achievement in a sample of first-year university students",
abstract = "There is substantial evidence that students in higher education who have sophisticated resource-management skills are more successful in their studies. Nevertheless, research shows that students are often not adequately prepared to use resource-management strategies effectively. It is thus crucial to screen and identify students who are at risk of poor resource management (and consequently, reduced academic achievement) to provide them with appropriate support. For this purpose, we extend the validation of a situational-judgment-based instrument called Resource-Management Inventory (ReMI), which assesses resource-management competency (including knowledge of resource-management strategies and the self-reported ability to use this knowledge in learning situations). We evaluated the ReMI regarding factor structure, measurement invariance, and its impact on academic achievement in different study domains in a sample of German first-year students (N = 380). The results confirm the five-factor structure that has been found in a previous study and indicate strong measurement invariance. Furthermore, taking cognitive covariates into account, the results confirm that the ReMI can predict students' grades incrementally. Finally, a multi-group analysis shows that the findings can be generalized across different study domains. Overall, we provide evidence for a valid and efficient instrument for the assessment of resource-management competency in higher education.",
keywords = "Measurement invariance, Resource management, Self-regulated learning, Situational-judgment instrument, Validation, Psychology",
author = "Julia Waldeyer and Jens Fleischer and Joachim Wirth and Detlev Leutner",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1027/1015-5759/a000557",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "777--786",
journal = "European Journal of Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1015-5759",
publisher = "Verlagsgem. Huber & Hogrefe",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validating the resource-management inventory (REMI)

T2 - testing measurement invariance and predicting academic achievement in a sample of first-year university students

AU - Waldeyer, Julia

AU - Fleischer, Jens

AU - Wirth, Joachim

AU - Leutner, Detlev

PY - 2020/9

Y1 - 2020/9

N2 - There is substantial evidence that students in higher education who have sophisticated resource-management skills are more successful in their studies. Nevertheless, research shows that students are often not adequately prepared to use resource-management strategies effectively. It is thus crucial to screen and identify students who are at risk of poor resource management (and consequently, reduced academic achievement) to provide them with appropriate support. For this purpose, we extend the validation of a situational-judgment-based instrument called Resource-Management Inventory (ReMI), which assesses resource-management competency (including knowledge of resource-management strategies and the self-reported ability to use this knowledge in learning situations). We evaluated the ReMI regarding factor structure, measurement invariance, and its impact on academic achievement in different study domains in a sample of German first-year students (N = 380). The results confirm the five-factor structure that has been found in a previous study and indicate strong measurement invariance. Furthermore, taking cognitive covariates into account, the results confirm that the ReMI can predict students' grades incrementally. Finally, a multi-group analysis shows that the findings can be generalized across different study domains. Overall, we provide evidence for a valid and efficient instrument for the assessment of resource-management competency in higher education.

AB - There is substantial evidence that students in higher education who have sophisticated resource-management skills are more successful in their studies. Nevertheless, research shows that students are often not adequately prepared to use resource-management strategies effectively. It is thus crucial to screen and identify students who are at risk of poor resource management (and consequently, reduced academic achievement) to provide them with appropriate support. For this purpose, we extend the validation of a situational-judgment-based instrument called Resource-Management Inventory (ReMI), which assesses resource-management competency (including knowledge of resource-management strategies and the self-reported ability to use this knowledge in learning situations). We evaluated the ReMI regarding factor structure, measurement invariance, and its impact on academic achievement in different study domains in a sample of German first-year students (N = 380). The results confirm the five-factor structure that has been found in a previous study and indicate strong measurement invariance. Furthermore, taking cognitive covariates into account, the results confirm that the ReMI can predict students' grades incrementally. Finally, a multi-group analysis shows that the findings can be generalized across different study domains. Overall, we provide evidence for a valid and efficient instrument for the assessment of resource-management competency in higher education.

KW - Measurement invariance

KW - Resource management

KW - Self-regulated learning

KW - Situational-judgment instrument

KW - Validation

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075663591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000557

DO - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000557

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85075663591

VL - 36

SP - 777

EP - 786

JO - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

SN - 1015-5759

IS - 5

ER -