Understanding and Communicating Climate Change in Metaphors

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Understanding and Communicating Climate Change in Metaphors. / Niebert, K.; Gropengiesser, H.
In: Environmental Education Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.06.2013, p. 282-302.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Niebert K, Gropengiesser H. Understanding and Communicating Climate Change in Metaphors. Environmental Education Research. 2013 Jun 1;19(3):282-302. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2012.690855

Bibtex

@article{05e7a7418d0944e0ac9e6492072f559e,
title = "Understanding and Communicating Climate Change in Metaphors",
abstract = "An analysis of students' conceptions on climate change shows a great confusion on key aspects of global warming. Even after instruction students often hold conceptions that differ from scientists' conceptions. Student's conceptions on global warming were collected in a reanalysis of 24 studies on everyday concepts of global warming as well as in an own interview study with 35 18-year-old students from German grammar schools. Climate-scientists conceptions were analysed from textbooks and research reports in a literature study. All data were analysed by systematic metaphor analysis and qualitative content analysis. Experientialism as a theory of metaphor provided insight in the process of understanding. The analysis of conceptions by experientialism shows that students and scientists have different metaphorical conceptions of global warming - but both refer to the same schemata. These schemata in mind we categorised the conceptions of global warming. Hereby we identified different thinking patterns in students' and scientists' conceptions. Following the model of educational reconstruction we took the metaphorical conceptions as a starting point for the development of learning environments. By uncovering the - mostly unconsciously - employed schemata, we gave students access to their metaphorical conceptions and let them reflect on their mental models.",
keywords = "Didactics of sciences education, analogy, climate change, conceptions, educational recontruction, experientialism, metaphor",
author = "K. Niebert and H. Gropengiesser",
year = "2013",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13504622.2012.690855",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "282--302",
journal = "Environmental Education Research",
issn = "1350-4622",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding and Communicating Climate Change in Metaphors

AU - Niebert, K.

AU - Gropengiesser, H.

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - An analysis of students' conceptions on climate change shows a great confusion on key aspects of global warming. Even after instruction students often hold conceptions that differ from scientists' conceptions. Student's conceptions on global warming were collected in a reanalysis of 24 studies on everyday concepts of global warming as well as in an own interview study with 35 18-year-old students from German grammar schools. Climate-scientists conceptions were analysed from textbooks and research reports in a literature study. All data were analysed by systematic metaphor analysis and qualitative content analysis. Experientialism as a theory of metaphor provided insight in the process of understanding. The analysis of conceptions by experientialism shows that students and scientists have different metaphorical conceptions of global warming - but both refer to the same schemata. These schemata in mind we categorised the conceptions of global warming. Hereby we identified different thinking patterns in students' and scientists' conceptions. Following the model of educational reconstruction we took the metaphorical conceptions as a starting point for the development of learning environments. By uncovering the - mostly unconsciously - employed schemata, we gave students access to their metaphorical conceptions and let them reflect on their mental models.

AB - An analysis of students' conceptions on climate change shows a great confusion on key aspects of global warming. Even after instruction students often hold conceptions that differ from scientists' conceptions. Student's conceptions on global warming were collected in a reanalysis of 24 studies on everyday concepts of global warming as well as in an own interview study with 35 18-year-old students from German grammar schools. Climate-scientists conceptions were analysed from textbooks and research reports in a literature study. All data were analysed by systematic metaphor analysis and qualitative content analysis. Experientialism as a theory of metaphor provided insight in the process of understanding. The analysis of conceptions by experientialism shows that students and scientists have different metaphorical conceptions of global warming - but both refer to the same schemata. These schemata in mind we categorised the conceptions of global warming. Hereby we identified different thinking patterns in students' and scientists' conceptions. Following the model of educational reconstruction we took the metaphorical conceptions as a starting point for the development of learning environments. By uncovering the - mostly unconsciously - employed schemata, we gave students access to their metaphorical conceptions and let them reflect on their mental models.

KW - Didactics of sciences education

KW - analogy

KW - climate change

KW - conceptions

KW - educational recontruction

KW - experientialism

KW - metaphor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879059636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13504622.2012.690855

DO - 10.1080/13504622.2012.690855

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84879059636

VL - 19

SP - 282

EP - 302

JO - Environmental Education Research

JF - Environmental Education Research

SN - 1350-4622

IS - 3

ER -