UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Lorraine Whitmarsh
  • Nick Nash
  • Paul Upham
  • Alyson Lloyd
  • James P. Verdon
  • J. Michael Kendall

There is growing recognition of the need to understand public attitudes to energy sources, such as shale gas, and to feed these into decision-making. This study represents the first detailed UK experimental survey of public perceptions of shale gas fracking, including analysis of the effects of different messages and the relative influence of different audience, message and contextual factors on support and risk perceptions in respect of shale gas fracking. Using an online survey (N = 1457) of the UK public, we find considerable ambivalence about shale gas, but also greater awareness of potential risks than benefits. Prior knowledge is associated with more favourable attitudes, although demographics, political affiliation and environmental values are strongest influences on perceptions. When provided with environmental or economic information about shale gas, participants became more positive - irrespective of their prior values or whether information is framed in terms of losses or gains. As expected, prior attitudes predict how information is received, with more attitude change amongst the most ambivalent respondents. We conclude that additional information about shale gas is more likely to be effective changing attitudes if focussed on this 'undecided' group. Studies of this type are important for policy makers and industry alike.

Original languageEnglish
JournalApplied Energy
Volume160
Pages (from-to)419-430
Number of pages12
ISSN0306-2619
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15.12.2015

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was funded under the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Partnership Grant, Still or Sparkling: Microseismic Monitoring of CO 2 injection at In Salah, NE/I010904 . We thank our survey respondents for their time in participating in this research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Social movement theory and research on radicalisation
  2. Forschendes Lernen – kinderleicht?
  3. 9/11 in European literature
  4. Tag questions across Irish English and British English
  5. Diagnose- und Interventionsformen für einen selbständigkeitsorientierten Unterricht am Beispiel Mathematik
  6. Die Entwicklung des „Steuerstaates“
  7. Katja Siekmann (Hrsg.) Theorie, Empirie und Praxis effektiver Rechtschreibdiagnostik
  8. Decentering the renaissance
  9. Teachers’ Well-Being and Associated Factors during the COVID-19 Pandemic
  10. Innovative Lehre - Grundsätze, Konzepte, Beispiele der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
  11. Liquidity - Networks - Deterritorialisation: Allan Sekula's Critique of Flow
  12. APPschaffung der Lehrkraft?
  13. Die Vorstandsperspektive
  14. Zoning of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves
  15. Narcissism and career success
  16. Arts sponsorship and the state of the city
  17. Management von Informationsrisiken in Supply Chains durch Data Warehousing
  18. Relationships between hydrological regime and ecosystem services supply in a Caribbean coastal wetland: a social-ecological approach
  19. Jenseits von Kontemplation und Aktion
  20. Analyses of Drugs and Pharmaceuticals in the Environment
  21. Organisationen, Institutionen, Professionsentwicklungen
  22. Standardisierung und Konsum
  23. A game theoretic model of the Northwestern European electricity market-market power and the environment
  24. Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss
  25. Religionsunterricht in der konsequent pluralistischen Schule
  26. Naturschutz in Deutschland
  27. Mit niedergeschlagenen Augen
  28. Pitfalls and potential of institutional change
  29. Employees' emotions in change
  30. Leistungsbeurteilung
  31. Sensomotorisches Training mit Balanceschuhen