Transformative research for sustainability: characteristics, tensions, and moving forward

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Authors

  • Andra Ioana Horcea-Milcu
  • Ine Dorresteijn
  • Julia Leventon
  • Milutin Stojanovic
  • David P.M. Lam
  • Daniel J. Lang
  • Angela Moriggi
  • Christopher M. Raymond
  • Sanna Stålhammar
  • Annika Weiser
  • Silja Zimmermann

Technical summary The question of how science can become a lever in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals permeates most recent sustainability research. Wide-ranging literature calling for a transformative approach has emerged in recent years. This 'transformative turn' is fueled by publications from fields such as sustainability science, social-ecological research, conservation science, sustainability transitions, or sustainability governance studies. However, there is a lack of a shared understanding specifically of what is meant for research to be transformative in this developing discourse around doing science differently to tackle sustainability problems. We aim to advance transformative research for sustainability. We define transformative research and outline six of its characteristics: (1) interventional nature and a theory of change focus; (2) collaborative modes of knowledge production, experimentation and learning; (3) systems thinking literacy and contextualization; (4) reflexivity, normative and inner dimensions; (5) local agency, decolonization, and reshaping power; (6) new quality criteria and rethinking impact. We highlight three tensions between transformative research and traditional paradigms of academic research: (1) process- and output-orientation; (2) accountability toward society and toward science; (3) methodologies rooted in scientific traditions and post-normal methodologies. We conclude with future directions on how academia could reconcile these tensions to support and promote transformative research. Non-technical summary Dominant ways of doing research are not enough to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The typical response of science to dealing with the current local and global sustainability crises is to produce and accumulate more knowledge. Transformative research seeks to couple knowledge production with co-creating change. This paper defines the transformative way of doing research to pro-actively support society's fight against pressing societal and environmental problems. We present six characteristics of transformative research. We reflect on the challenges related to implementing these characteristics in scientific practice and on how academia can play its part.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14
JournalGlobal Sustainability
Volume7
Number of pages16
ISSN2059-4798
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 07.2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Evaluating Boundary-Crossing Collaboration in Research-Practice Partnerships in Teacher Education: Empirical Insights on Co-Construction, Motivation, Satisfaction, Trust, and Competence Enhancement
  2. What is governance in global telecoupling?
  3. Measuring what matters in sustainable consumption:
  4. Transitions and Old Age Potential
  5. Training sessions fostering transdisciplinary collaboration for sustainable development
  6. Cruelty and Total War
  7. Nanomechanical Analysis and Fractography of Extruded Mg-Dy-Nd Based Alloy Influenced by Solution Heat Treatment
  8. Toward a Kaleidoscopic Understanding of Anonymity
  9. Entry of biocides and their transformation products into groundwater via urban stormwater infiltration systems
  10. Entscheide du
  11. The Timing of Daily Demand for Goods and Services - Microsimulation Policy Results of an Aging Society, Increasing Labour Market Flexibility, and Extended Public Childcare in Germany
  12. Comparison of the effects of long-lasting static stretching and hypertrophy training on maximal strength, muscle thickness and flexibility in the plantar flexors
  13. Ambiguous Effects of Risk Aversion on Healthy Nutrition
  14. A review of FEM code accuracy for reliable extrusion process analysis
  15. Modifying Our Society With Law:
  16. Daily deep acting toward coworkers
  17. Determinants of materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting
  18. Single photoproduction of η-mesons of hydrogen in the forward direction at 4 and 6 GeV
  19. Polite rejections
  20. Collaboration or fragmentation?
  21. Modeling the C(o)urse of Privacy-critical Location-based Services
  22. Inflation: Drivers and Dynamics 2020 CEBRA Annual Meeting Session Summary
  23. Datenstrukturen und Algorithmen
  24. T&T Clark Handbook of Christian Eschatology
  25. Identifying clinically relevant agranulocytosis in people registered on the UK clozapine Central Non-Rechallenge Database: retrospective cohort study
  26. Digital ultraviolet therapy