Transcending the transmission model: A reconstruction of Corporate Social Responsibility communication from a constitutive perspective

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

Transcending the transmission model: A reconstruction of Corporate Social Responsibility communication from a constitutive perspective. / Schoeneborn, Dennis; Trittin, Hannah; Scherer, Andreas Georg.
Zürich: Universität Zürich, 2011. (UZH Business Working Paper Series; No. 203).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schoeneborn D, Trittin H, Scherer AG. Transcending the transmission model: A reconstruction of Corporate Social Responsibility communication from a constitutive perspective. Zürich: Universität Zürich. 2011 Dec. (UZH Business Working Paper Series; 203). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1975785

Bibtex

@techreport{26ca1959980948afb585c13cd5343cfa,
title = "Transcending the transmission model: A reconstruction of Corporate Social Responsibility communication from a constitutive perspective",
abstract = "Extant research on CSR communication has focused primarily on external communication, i.e. what firms communicate to their environment. At the same time, a large part of this literature exhibits a mechanistic understanding of communication that implies the possibility of a package-like transfer of information and meaning from sender to receiver. However, this notion of communication can be criticized for neglecting the constitutive role of communication for organizations. As an alternative, these authors propose a theoretical perspective known as “communication constitutes organizations” (CCO). The CCO view allows for grasping organizations as holistic and polyphonic communicative entities. Hence, what are the implications for CSR communication when we switch from a mechanistic to a constitutive notion of communication? Our application of the CCO view yields three main findings: (1) CSR communication represents only one of several communicative practices that collectively constitute the organization and that evolve in competition with one another; (2) CSR communication is not only a function of (large-scale) formal organizations, but as a communicative activity it can itself also form the constitutive basis for the emergence of rudimentary, local, and temporary forms of organizing; (3) According to the CCO view, organizations are constituted and stabilized by various non-human entities (e.g., texts or other artifacts) that “act” on their behalf. Thus, CSR communication would need to take also into account the agency and responsibility of these non-human entities, which in some cases lack concrete individual human creators who could be held accountable for. Taken together, our paper links the literature on CSR communication to broader debates in organizational communication studies. By applying the CCO view, we arrive at a new understanding of CSR communication that allows for comprehending the legitimacy and accountability of organizations as holistic communicative phenomena and helps to transcend a one-sided accentuation of the external side of CSR communication. ",
keywords = "Management studies, Corporate social responsibility (CSR), CSR communication, organizational communication, polyphony, communication constitutes organizations , social constructionism",
author = "Dennis Schoeneborn and Hannah Trittin and Scherer, {Andreas Georg}",
year = "2011",
month = dec,
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.1975785",
language = "English",
series = "UZH Business Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Universit{\"a}t Z{\"u}rich",
number = "203",
address = "Switzerland",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Universit{\"a}t Z{\"u}rich",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Transcending the transmission model

T2 - A reconstruction of Corporate Social Responsibility communication from a constitutive perspective

AU - Schoeneborn, Dennis

AU - Trittin, Hannah

AU - Scherer, Andreas Georg

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Extant research on CSR communication has focused primarily on external communication, i.e. what firms communicate to their environment. At the same time, a large part of this literature exhibits a mechanistic understanding of communication that implies the possibility of a package-like transfer of information and meaning from sender to receiver. However, this notion of communication can be criticized for neglecting the constitutive role of communication for organizations. As an alternative, these authors propose a theoretical perspective known as “communication constitutes organizations” (CCO). The CCO view allows for grasping organizations as holistic and polyphonic communicative entities. Hence, what are the implications for CSR communication when we switch from a mechanistic to a constitutive notion of communication? Our application of the CCO view yields three main findings: (1) CSR communication represents only one of several communicative practices that collectively constitute the organization and that evolve in competition with one another; (2) CSR communication is not only a function of (large-scale) formal organizations, but as a communicative activity it can itself also form the constitutive basis for the emergence of rudimentary, local, and temporary forms of organizing; (3) According to the CCO view, organizations are constituted and stabilized by various non-human entities (e.g., texts or other artifacts) that “act” on their behalf. Thus, CSR communication would need to take also into account the agency and responsibility of these non-human entities, which in some cases lack concrete individual human creators who could be held accountable for. Taken together, our paper links the literature on CSR communication to broader debates in organizational communication studies. By applying the CCO view, we arrive at a new understanding of CSR communication that allows for comprehending the legitimacy and accountability of organizations as holistic communicative phenomena and helps to transcend a one-sided accentuation of the external side of CSR communication.

AB - Extant research on CSR communication has focused primarily on external communication, i.e. what firms communicate to their environment. At the same time, a large part of this literature exhibits a mechanistic understanding of communication that implies the possibility of a package-like transfer of information and meaning from sender to receiver. However, this notion of communication can be criticized for neglecting the constitutive role of communication for organizations. As an alternative, these authors propose a theoretical perspective known as “communication constitutes organizations” (CCO). The CCO view allows for grasping organizations as holistic and polyphonic communicative entities. Hence, what are the implications for CSR communication when we switch from a mechanistic to a constitutive notion of communication? Our application of the CCO view yields three main findings: (1) CSR communication represents only one of several communicative practices that collectively constitute the organization and that evolve in competition with one another; (2) CSR communication is not only a function of (large-scale) formal organizations, but as a communicative activity it can itself also form the constitutive basis for the emergence of rudimentary, local, and temporary forms of organizing; (3) According to the CCO view, organizations are constituted and stabilized by various non-human entities (e.g., texts or other artifacts) that “act” on their behalf. Thus, CSR communication would need to take also into account the agency and responsibility of these non-human entities, which in some cases lack concrete individual human creators who could be held accountable for. Taken together, our paper links the literature on CSR communication to broader debates in organizational communication studies. By applying the CCO view, we arrive at a new understanding of CSR communication that allows for comprehending the legitimacy and accountability of organizations as holistic communicative phenomena and helps to transcend a one-sided accentuation of the external side of CSR communication.

KW - Management studies

KW - Corporate social responsibility (CSR)

KW - CSR communication

KW - organizational communication

KW - polyphony

KW - communication constitutes organizations

KW - social constructionism

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f6196399-2cd4-3921-9773-9c4e90ad6914/

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.1975785

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.1975785

M3 - Working papers

T3 - UZH Business Working Paper Series

BT - Transcending the transmission model

PB - Universität Zürich

CY - Zürich

ER -

Documents

DOI