The role of knowledge and information in innovation: The case of genetic engineering
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Standard
In: International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 26, No. 5/6, 01.01.2003, p. 640-654.
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of knowledge and information in innovation
T2 - The case of genetic engineering
AU - Weisenfeld, U
AU - Nissen, Dirk
AU - Gassert, Kathrin
PY - 2003/1/1
Y1 - 2003/1/1
N2 - Knowledge and information play key roles in the perception and acceptance of innovations, particularly when innovations are associated with risks. In an empirical study we studied these aspects with regard to innovations based on genetic engineering. In particular, we focused on aspects of information behaviour such as interest in information and credibility of information sources. Genetic engineering is a technology that is controversially discussed and several representative studies have shown that consumers have little knowledge about the technology, are sceptical regarding genetic engineering experts and are not likely to buy the respective products. Using a higher education sample (270 students) we found that even a lower percentage rated their knowledge on science and genetic engineering as being good, interest in various aspects of genetic engineering was not dependent on the self-assessed knowledge of the respondents, and information sources were rated differently with regard to their credibility.
AB - Knowledge and information play key roles in the perception and acceptance of innovations, particularly when innovations are associated with risks. In an empirical study we studied these aspects with regard to innovations based on genetic engineering. In particular, we focused on aspects of information behaviour such as interest in information and credibility of information sources. Genetic engineering is a technology that is controversially discussed and several representative studies have shown that consumers have little knowledge about the technology, are sceptical regarding genetic engineering experts and are not likely to buy the respective products. Using a higher education sample (270 students) we found that even a lower percentage rated their knowledge on science and genetic engineering as being good, interest in various aspects of genetic engineering was not dependent on the self-assessed knowledge of the respondents, and information sources were rated differently with regard to their credibility.
KW - Management studies
KW - Communication
KW - Credibility
KW - Genetic engineering
KW - Information
KW - Knowledge
KW - Risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041931026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ac174144-c8df-3dae-89d7-6b4a358b8f57/
U2 - 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003427
DO - 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003427
M3 - Scientific review articles
VL - 26
SP - 640
EP - 654
JO - International Journal of Technology Management
JF - International Journal of Technology Management
SN - 0267-5730
IS - 5/6
ER -