The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science. / Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science"; Röseler, Lukas; Kaiser, Leonard et al.
In: Journal of Open Psychology Data, Vol. 12, No. 1, 8, 11.09.2024.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science", Röseler, L, Kaiser, L, Doetsch, C, Klett, N, Genschow, O, Oomen, D, Koppold, A & Korbmacher, M 2024, 'The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science', Journal of Open Psychology Data, vol. 12, no. 1, 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.101

APA

Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science", Röseler, L., Kaiser, L., Doetsch, C., Klett, N., Genschow, O., Oomen, D., Koppold, A., & Korbmacher, M. (2024). The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 12(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.101

Vancouver

Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science", Röseler L, Kaiser L, Doetsch C, Klett N, Genschow O et al. The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science. Journal of Open Psychology Data. 2024 Sept 11;12(1):8. doi: 10.5334/jopd.101

Bibtex

@article{cf7eca754c8949dab99ebad237c97aad,
title = "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science",
abstract = "In psychological science, replicability—repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)—is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the Replication Database (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.",
keywords = "Psychology, replication, replication crisis, database, open science, collaborative, credibility, revolution, meta science",
author = "{Author Collaboration for {"}The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science{"}} and Lukas R{\"o}seler and Leonard Kaiser and Christopher Doetsch and Noah Klett and Christian Seida and Astrid Sch{\"u}tz and Balazs Aczel and Nadia Adelina and Valeria Agostini and Samuel Alarie and Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir and Alaa Aldoh and Al-Hoorie, {Ali H.} and Flavio Azevedo and Baker, {Bradley J.} and Barth, {Charlotte Lilian} and Julia Beitner and Cameron Brick and Chandrashekar, {Subramanya Prasad} and Hilmar Brohmer and Chung, {Kai Li} and Cockcroft, {Jamie P.} and Jamie Cummins and Veronica Diveica and Tsvetomira Dumbalska and Emir Efendic and Mahmoud Elsherif and Thomas Evans and Gilad Feldman and Adrien Fillon and Nico F{\"o}rster and Joris Frese and Oliver Genschow and Vaitsa Giannouli and Biljana Gjoneska and Timo Gnambs and Am{\'e}lie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe and Graham, {Christopher J.} and Helena Hartmann and Clove Haviva and Alina Herderich and Hilbert, {Leon P.} and Dar{\'i}as Holgado and Ian Hussey and Ilchovska, {Zlatomira G.} and Tamara Kalandadze and Veli-Matti Karhulahti and Leon Kasseckert and Maren Klingelh{\"o}fer-Jens and Danna Oomen and Alina Koppold and Max Korbmacher",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "11",
doi = "10.5334/jopd.101",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Journal of Open Psychology Data",
issn = "2050-9863",
publisher = "Ubiquity Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science

AU - Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science"

AU - Röseler, Lukas

AU - Kaiser, Leonard

AU - Doetsch, Christopher

AU - Klett, Noah

AU - Seida, Christian

AU - Schütz, Astrid

AU - Aczel, Balazs

AU - Adelina, Nadia

AU - Agostini, Valeria

AU - Alarie, Samuel

AU - Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan

AU - Aldoh, Alaa

AU - Al-Hoorie, Ali H.

AU - Azevedo, Flavio

AU - Baker, Bradley J.

AU - Barth, Charlotte Lilian

AU - Beitner, Julia

AU - Brick, Cameron

AU - Chandrashekar, Subramanya Prasad

AU - Brohmer, Hilmar

AU - Chung, Kai Li

AU - Cockcroft, Jamie P.

AU - Cummins, Jamie

AU - Diveica, Veronica

AU - Dumbalska, Tsvetomira

AU - Efendic, Emir

AU - Elsherif, Mahmoud

AU - Evans, Thomas

AU - Feldman, Gilad

AU - Fillon, Adrien

AU - Förster, Nico

AU - Frese, Joris

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Giannouli, Vaitsa

AU - Gjoneska, Biljana

AU - Gnambs, Timo

AU - Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie

AU - Graham, Christopher J.

AU - Hartmann, Helena

AU - Haviva, Clove

AU - Herderich, Alina

AU - Hilbert, Leon P.

AU - Holgado, Darías

AU - Hussey, Ian

AU - Ilchovska, Zlatomira G.

AU - Kalandadze, Tamara

AU - Karhulahti, Veli-Matti

AU - Kasseckert, Leon

AU - Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren

AU - Oomen, Danna

AU - Koppold, Alina

AU - Korbmacher, Max

PY - 2024/9/11

Y1 - 2024/9/11

N2 - In psychological science, replicability—repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)—is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the Replication Database (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.

AB - In psychological science, replicability—repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)—is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the Replication Database (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.

KW - Psychology

KW - replication

KW - replication crisis

KW - database

KW - open science

KW - collaborative

KW - credibility

KW - revolution

KW - meta science

U2 - 10.5334/jopd.101

DO - 10.5334/jopd.101

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 12

JO - Journal of Open Psychology Data

JF - Journal of Open Psychology Data

SN - 2050-9863

IS - 1

M1 - 8

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Understanding Societal Development and Moral Progress: The Contribution of the World Values Surveys
  2. Knowledge Spaces
  3. Workshop „Meta-Image Day 2012”
  4. Liquidity, Flows, Circulation: The Cultural Logic of Environmentalization (2nd part) 2021
  5. Language Learning in Blended-Learning Projects: Moodle, Web 2.0, and Learner Agency
  6. Ars Electronica
  7. Blogs in the Foreign Language Classroom
  8. 9th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices - SSD 2012
  9. Are Self-Employed Time and Money Poor? Dynamics of Interpendent Multidimensional Poverty with German Time Use Diary Data
  10. Developing the ‘Benign by Design’ Approach for a Rational Design of Green Derivatives of b -Blockers: Propranolol as an Example
  11. From Christiane to Elisabeth. The 19th Century Genesis of the Intellectually Working Woman and the Epistemological Dependency on Structures of Desire in Hegel and Nietzsche
  12. Institutional dynamics of affecting and being affected: The emotionalization of injustice and the threat of withdrawing the organizational identification
  13. Scene as Ecosystem, Scenes as Parts of Ecosystems or Scene versus Ecosystem? Some considerations about the compability of two conceptional approaches
  14. 24th IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics
  15. 13th Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research Workshop - TEAR 2018
  16. Exploring Sustainability in Virtual Space
  17. Towards a sustainable Southern Transylvania: Recognizing existing contributions to reach sustainable visions and empowering stakeholders
  18. 1st International Conference of the International Association for Computing and Philosophy - IACAP 2011
  19. Going Green 2015 - Exploring Sustainability in Virtual Space

Publications

  1. Inconsistent short-term effects of enhanced structural complexity on soil microbial properties across German forests
  2. Reporting and Analysing the Environmental Impact of Language Models on the Example of Commonsense Question Answering with External Knowledge
  3. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services
  4. Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions
  5. An Experimental Approach to the Optimization of Customer Information at the Point of Sale
  6. Model Based Logistic Monitoring of Assembly Areas
  7. Automated scoring in the era of artificial intelligence
  8. Handicaps in job assignment
  9. Adaptor device for transmitting e.g. blood pressure data of human body from blood pressure measuring device of data communication system to e.g. personal computer, has controller for controlling transmission of data to communication module
  10. A common European asylum system? How variation in Member States’ administrative capacity undermines EU asylum harmonisation
  11. Basic analysis of the incremental profile forming process
  12. HAWK@QALD5 - Trying to answer hybrid questions with various simple ranking techniques
  13. Models for integrated production-inventory systems
  14. Modeling of microstructural pattern formation in crystal plasticity
  15. Learning in Real-World Laboratories: A Systematic Impulse for Discussion
  16. Time for the Environment: The Tutzing Time Ecology Project
  17. Evidence for singlet state β cleavage in the photoreaction of α-(2,6-dimethoxyphenoxy)-acetophenone inferred from time-resolved CIDNP spectroscopy
  18. Distal and proximal predictors of snacking at work
  19. A Theory-Based Concept for Fostering Sustainability Competencies in Engineering Programs