The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science. / Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science"; Röseler, Lukas; Kaiser, Leonard et al.
in: Journal of Open Psychology Data, Jahrgang 12, Nr. 1, 8, 11.09.2024.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science", Röseler, L, Kaiser, L, Doetsch, C, Klett, N, Genschow, O, Oomen, D, Koppold, A & Korbmacher, M 2024, 'The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science', Journal of Open Psychology Data, Jg. 12, Nr. 1, 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.101

APA

Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science", Röseler, L., Kaiser, L., Doetsch, C., Klett, N., Genschow, O., Oomen, D., Koppold, A., & Korbmacher, M. (2024). The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 12(1), Artikel 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.101

Vancouver

Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science", Röseler L, Kaiser L, Doetsch C, Klett N, Genschow O et al. The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science. Journal of Open Psychology Data. 2024 Sep 11;12(1):8. doi: 10.5334/jopd.101

Bibtex

@article{cf7eca754c8949dab99ebad237c97aad,
title = "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science",
abstract = "In psychological science, replicability—repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)—is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the Replication Database (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.",
keywords = "Psychology, replication, replication crisis, database, open science, collaborative, credibility, revolution, meta science",
author = "{Author Collaboration for {"}The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science{"}} and Lukas R{\"o}seler and Leonard Kaiser and Christopher Doetsch and Noah Klett and Christian Seida and Astrid Sch{\"u}tz and Balazs Aczel and Nadia Adelina and Valeria Agostini and Samuel Alarie and Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir and Alaa Aldoh and Al-Hoorie, {Ali H.} and Flavio Azevedo and Baker, {Bradley J.} and Barth, {Charlotte Lilian} and Julia Beitner and Cameron Brick and Chandrashekar, {Subramanya Prasad} and Hilmar Brohmer and Chung, {Kai Li} and Cockcroft, {Jamie P.} and Jamie Cummins and Veronica Diveica and Tsvetomira Dumbalska and Emir Efendic and Mahmoud Elsherif and Thomas Evans and Gilad Feldman and Adrien Fillon and Nico F{\"o}rster and Joris Frese and Oliver Genschow and Vaitsa Giannouli and Biljana Gjoneska and Timo Gnambs and Am{\'e}lie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe and Graham, {Christopher J.} and Helena Hartmann and Clove Haviva and Alina Herderich and Hilbert, {Leon P.} and Dar{\'i}as Holgado and Ian Hussey and Ilchovska, {Zlatomira G.} and Tamara Kalandadze and Veli-Matti Karhulahti and Leon Kasseckert and Maren Klingelh{\"o}fer-Jens and Danna Oomen and Alina Koppold and Max Korbmacher",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "11",
doi = "10.5334/jopd.101",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Journal of Open Psychology Data",
issn = "2050-9863",
publisher = "Ubiquity Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science

AU - Author Collaboration for "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science"

AU - Röseler, Lukas

AU - Kaiser, Leonard

AU - Doetsch, Christopher

AU - Klett, Noah

AU - Seida, Christian

AU - Schütz, Astrid

AU - Aczel, Balazs

AU - Adelina, Nadia

AU - Agostini, Valeria

AU - Alarie, Samuel

AU - Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan

AU - Aldoh, Alaa

AU - Al-Hoorie, Ali H.

AU - Azevedo, Flavio

AU - Baker, Bradley J.

AU - Barth, Charlotte Lilian

AU - Beitner, Julia

AU - Brick, Cameron

AU - Chandrashekar, Subramanya Prasad

AU - Brohmer, Hilmar

AU - Chung, Kai Li

AU - Cockcroft, Jamie P.

AU - Cummins, Jamie

AU - Diveica, Veronica

AU - Dumbalska, Tsvetomira

AU - Efendic, Emir

AU - Elsherif, Mahmoud

AU - Evans, Thomas

AU - Feldman, Gilad

AU - Fillon, Adrien

AU - Förster, Nico

AU - Frese, Joris

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Giannouli, Vaitsa

AU - Gjoneska, Biljana

AU - Gnambs, Timo

AU - Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie

AU - Graham, Christopher J.

AU - Hartmann, Helena

AU - Haviva, Clove

AU - Herderich, Alina

AU - Hilbert, Leon P.

AU - Holgado, Darías

AU - Hussey, Ian

AU - Ilchovska, Zlatomira G.

AU - Kalandadze, Tamara

AU - Karhulahti, Veli-Matti

AU - Kasseckert, Leon

AU - Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren

AU - Oomen, Danna

AU - Koppold, Alina

AU - Korbmacher, Max

PY - 2024/9/11

Y1 - 2024/9/11

N2 - In psychological science, replicability—repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)—is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the Replication Database (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.

AB - In psychological science, replicability—repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)—is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the Replication Database (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.

KW - Psychology

KW - replication

KW - replication crisis

KW - database

KW - open science

KW - collaborative

KW - credibility

KW - revolution

KW - meta science

U2 - 10.5334/jopd.101

DO - 10.5334/jopd.101

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 12

JO - Journal of Open Psychology Data

JF - Journal of Open Psychology Data

SN - 2050-9863

IS - 1

M1 - 8

ER -

DOI