The Past, Present and Future of the Corporate Actor: Ontological, Epistemological and Theoretical Considerations

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Past, Present and Future of the Corporate Actor: Ontological, Epistemological and Theoretical Considerations. / Haase, Michaela; Schuessler, Elke; Schmiel, Ute et al.
In: Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 16.06.2025.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{03804501e62c404c94bb5780d8987df5,
title = "The Past, Present and Future of the Corporate Actor: Ontological, Epistemological and Theoretical Considerations",
abstract = "Corporate actors are more resourceful, more powerful and more capable of influencing their own conditions of action than most other actors. This curated article argues that to imagine the future of corporate actors in a world that is rapidly changing due to the possibilities of digital technology and sustainability challenges, we also need to revisit dominant conceptualizations of the corporate actor in economic or social science research. The four essays included in this article draw on different theories to elaborate on the role that corporate actors play, could play, or should play in the future. The problems that the authors identify in their essays include the power and wrongdoing of corporate actors; the ability of corporate actors to create their environment, not just react to it; the lack of a concept of (corporate) responsibility capable of responding to the desiderata of society; and the accountability of corporate actorhood outside the boundaries of formal organizations. By providing reflections on these problems, this article—written against the background of the historical peculiarities of German business administration research marked by a neglect of collectivist concepts such as corporate actors—shows that research and society actively co-construct the roles and responsibilities of corporate actors. The performativity of theories addressing corporate actors is thus a concern for business administration scholars aiming to contribute to a more sustainable future.",
keywords = "Actorhood, B3, B4, Corporate actor, Fiction, German BWL, L29, N44, Organization theory, Power, Responsibility, Z10, Management studies, Entrepreneurship",
author = "Michaela Haase and Elke Schuessler and Ute Schmiel and G{\"u}nther Ortmann and Andreas Suchanek and Dennis Schoeneborn",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2025.",
year = "2025",
month = jun,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1007/s41471-025-00213-w",
language = "English",
journal = "Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0341-2687",
publisher = "Springer Gabler",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Past, Present and Future of the Corporate Actor

T2 - Ontological, Epistemological and Theoretical Considerations

AU - Haase, Michaela

AU - Schuessler, Elke

AU - Schmiel, Ute

AU - Ortmann, Günther

AU - Suchanek, Andreas

AU - Schoeneborn, Dennis

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.

PY - 2025/6/16

Y1 - 2025/6/16

N2 - Corporate actors are more resourceful, more powerful and more capable of influencing their own conditions of action than most other actors. This curated article argues that to imagine the future of corporate actors in a world that is rapidly changing due to the possibilities of digital technology and sustainability challenges, we also need to revisit dominant conceptualizations of the corporate actor in economic or social science research. The four essays included in this article draw on different theories to elaborate on the role that corporate actors play, could play, or should play in the future. The problems that the authors identify in their essays include the power and wrongdoing of corporate actors; the ability of corporate actors to create their environment, not just react to it; the lack of a concept of (corporate) responsibility capable of responding to the desiderata of society; and the accountability of corporate actorhood outside the boundaries of formal organizations. By providing reflections on these problems, this article—written against the background of the historical peculiarities of German business administration research marked by a neglect of collectivist concepts such as corporate actors—shows that research and society actively co-construct the roles and responsibilities of corporate actors. The performativity of theories addressing corporate actors is thus a concern for business administration scholars aiming to contribute to a more sustainable future.

AB - Corporate actors are more resourceful, more powerful and more capable of influencing their own conditions of action than most other actors. This curated article argues that to imagine the future of corporate actors in a world that is rapidly changing due to the possibilities of digital technology and sustainability challenges, we also need to revisit dominant conceptualizations of the corporate actor in economic or social science research. The four essays included in this article draw on different theories to elaborate on the role that corporate actors play, could play, or should play in the future. The problems that the authors identify in their essays include the power and wrongdoing of corporate actors; the ability of corporate actors to create their environment, not just react to it; the lack of a concept of (corporate) responsibility capable of responding to the desiderata of society; and the accountability of corporate actorhood outside the boundaries of formal organizations. By providing reflections on these problems, this article—written against the background of the historical peculiarities of German business administration research marked by a neglect of collectivist concepts such as corporate actors—shows that research and society actively co-construct the roles and responsibilities of corporate actors. The performativity of theories addressing corporate actors is thus a concern for business administration scholars aiming to contribute to a more sustainable future.

KW - Actorhood

KW - B3

KW - B4

KW - Corporate actor

KW - Fiction

KW - German BWL

KW - L29

KW - N44

KW - Organization theory

KW - Power

KW - Responsibility

KW - Z10

KW - Management studies

KW - Entrepreneurship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105008248929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s41471-025-00213-w

DO - 10.1007/s41471-025-00213-w

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:105008248929

JO - Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research

JF - Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research

SN - 0341-2687

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Seeing faces, when faces can't be seen
  2. Elevated air carbon dioxide concentrations increase dissolved carbon leaching from a cropland soil
  3. Digi-Exist
  4. Role of critical points of the skin friction field in formation of plumes in thermal convection
  5. Environmental Governance of China's Belt and Road Initiative
  6. The moderating role of experience on the relationship between trust and performance of cooperating SMEs in transformation economies
  7. Jochen Werner: Aki Kaurismäki
  8. Population genetics and ecological niche modelling reveal high fragmentation and potential future extinction of the endangered relict butterfly Lycaena helle
  9. Transformations of pesticides in the atmosphere
  10. A theoretical framework to support green agripreneurship avoiding greenwashing
  11. Can knowledge of priority effects improve outcomes of ecological restoration?
  12. Reconciling Analytics with Holistic Thinking in Business Sustainability Decision-Making
  13. Veränderungen in den Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsstrukturen
  14. On the influence of settling of (ZrB2)P inoculants on Grain Refinement of Mg-alloys
  15. Li-Yorke pairs of full Hausdorff dimension for some chaotic dynamical systems
  16. Beyond social influence
  17. Development of pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes towards inclusive education through first teaching experiences
  18. Is the future still open? The mediating role of occupational future time perspective in the effects of career adaptability and aging experience on late career planning
  19. Usually hated, sometimes loved:
  20. Der europäische Weg
  21. Subversive Gamification