The display makes a difference: A mobile eye tracking study on the perception of art before and after a museum's rearrangement

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The display makes a difference: A mobile eye tracking study on the perception of art before and after a museum's rearrangement. / Reitstätter, Luise; Brinkmann, Hanna; Santini, Thiago et al.
In: Journal of Eye Movement Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 6, 19.06.2020.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Reitstätter, L, Brinkmann, H, Santini, T, Specker, E, Dare, Z, Bakondi, F, Miscená, A, Kasneci, E, Leder, H & Rosenberg, R 2020, 'The display makes a difference: A mobile eye tracking study on the perception of art before and after a museum's rearrangement', Journal of Eye Movement Research, vol. 13, no. 2, 6. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.2.6

APA

Reitstätter, L., Brinkmann, H., Santini, T., Specker, E., Dare, Z., Bakondi, F., Miscená, A., Kasneci, E., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R. (2020). The display makes a difference: A mobile eye tracking study on the perception of art before and after a museum's rearrangement. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13(2), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.2.6

Vancouver

Reitstätter L, Brinkmann H, Santini T, Specker E, Dare Z, Bakondi F et al. The display makes a difference: A mobile eye tracking study on the perception of art before and after a museum's rearrangement. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 2020 Jun 19;13(2):6. doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.2.6

Bibtex

@article{257bed9ab85e40a195910d9b5a484689,
title = "The display makes a difference: A mobile eye tracking study on the perception of art before and after a museum's rearrangement",
abstract = "There is increasing awareness that the perception of art is affected by the way it is presented. In 2018, the Austrian Gallery Belvedere redisplayed its permanent collection. Our multidisciplinary team seized this opportunity to investigate the viewing behavior of specific artworks both before and after the museum's rearrangement. In contrast to previous mobile eye tracking (MET) studies in museums, this study benefits from the comparison of two realistic display conditions (without any research interference), an unconstrained study design (working with regular museum visitors), and a large data sample (comprising 259 participants). We employed a mixed-method approach that combined mobile eye tracking, subjective mapping (a drawing task in conjunction with an open interview), and a questionnaire in order to relate gaze patterns to processes of meaning-making. Our results show that the new display made a difference in that it 1) generally increased the viewing times of the artworks; 2) clearly extended the reading times of labels; and 3) deepened visitors' engagement with the artworks in their exhibition reflections. In contrast, interest in specific artworks and art form preferences proved to be robust and independent of presentation modes.",
keywords = "Art perception, Attention, Exhibition display, Mobile eye tracking, Museum studies, Social influences, Usability, Visitor research, Digital media, Media and communication studies",
author = "Luise Reitst{\"a}tter and Hanna Brinkmann and Thiago Santini and Eva Specker and Zoya Dare and Flora Bakondi and Anna Miscen{\'a} and Enkelejda Kasneci and Helmut Leder and Raphael Rosenberg",
note = "Funding Information: We would like to cordially thank the whole team of the Austrian Gallery Belvedere with its Scientific Director, Stella Rollig, for the collaboration and especially Margarete Stechl for the daily support. Our heartfelt thanks also go to Anna Cornelia Barbulesco, Jane Boddy, Max Douda, Anna Fekete, Judith Herunter, Sarah H{\"u}bler, Re-beka Jovanoska, Jisoo Kim, Katrin Kopp, Marthe Kretzschmar, Rosita Messmer, Kristina Miklosova, Adrian Praschl-Bichler, Rebekah Rodriguez, Stephanie Sailer, Rosa Sancarlo, Berna Selin Sayin, Hamida Sivac, Mariette Soulat, Julia Starke, Clara Swaboda, Magdalena Syen, Daniel Teibrich, Veronika Vishnevskaia, and Sophie Wratzfeld for their valuable help in data collection and data preparation. This research was supported in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, grant P25821 and P27355) and the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF, grant CS15-036). Open access funding was provided by the University of Vienna. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, International Group for Eye Movement Research.",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "19",
doi = "10.16910/jemr.13.2.6",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Eye Movement Research",
issn = "1995-8692",
publisher = "Universit{\"a}t Bern",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The display makes a difference

T2 - A mobile eye tracking study on the perception of art before and after a museum's rearrangement

AU - Reitstätter, Luise

AU - Brinkmann, Hanna

AU - Santini, Thiago

AU - Specker, Eva

AU - Dare, Zoya

AU - Bakondi, Flora

AU - Miscená, Anna

AU - Kasneci, Enkelejda

AU - Leder, Helmut

AU - Rosenberg, Raphael

N1 - Funding Information: We would like to cordially thank the whole team of the Austrian Gallery Belvedere with its Scientific Director, Stella Rollig, for the collaboration and especially Margarete Stechl for the daily support. Our heartfelt thanks also go to Anna Cornelia Barbulesco, Jane Boddy, Max Douda, Anna Fekete, Judith Herunter, Sarah Hübler, Re-beka Jovanoska, Jisoo Kim, Katrin Kopp, Marthe Kretzschmar, Rosita Messmer, Kristina Miklosova, Adrian Praschl-Bichler, Rebekah Rodriguez, Stephanie Sailer, Rosa Sancarlo, Berna Selin Sayin, Hamida Sivac, Mariette Soulat, Julia Starke, Clara Swaboda, Magdalena Syen, Daniel Teibrich, Veronika Vishnevskaia, and Sophie Wratzfeld for their valuable help in data collection and data preparation. This research was supported in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, grant P25821 and P27355) and the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF, grant CS15-036). Open access funding was provided by the University of Vienna. Publisher Copyright: © 2020, International Group for Eye Movement Research.

PY - 2020/6/19

Y1 - 2020/6/19

N2 - There is increasing awareness that the perception of art is affected by the way it is presented. In 2018, the Austrian Gallery Belvedere redisplayed its permanent collection. Our multidisciplinary team seized this opportunity to investigate the viewing behavior of specific artworks both before and after the museum's rearrangement. In contrast to previous mobile eye tracking (MET) studies in museums, this study benefits from the comparison of two realistic display conditions (without any research interference), an unconstrained study design (working with regular museum visitors), and a large data sample (comprising 259 participants). We employed a mixed-method approach that combined mobile eye tracking, subjective mapping (a drawing task in conjunction with an open interview), and a questionnaire in order to relate gaze patterns to processes of meaning-making. Our results show that the new display made a difference in that it 1) generally increased the viewing times of the artworks; 2) clearly extended the reading times of labels; and 3) deepened visitors' engagement with the artworks in their exhibition reflections. In contrast, interest in specific artworks and art form preferences proved to be robust and independent of presentation modes.

AB - There is increasing awareness that the perception of art is affected by the way it is presented. In 2018, the Austrian Gallery Belvedere redisplayed its permanent collection. Our multidisciplinary team seized this opportunity to investigate the viewing behavior of specific artworks both before and after the museum's rearrangement. In contrast to previous mobile eye tracking (MET) studies in museums, this study benefits from the comparison of two realistic display conditions (without any research interference), an unconstrained study design (working with regular museum visitors), and a large data sample (comprising 259 participants). We employed a mixed-method approach that combined mobile eye tracking, subjective mapping (a drawing task in conjunction with an open interview), and a questionnaire in order to relate gaze patterns to processes of meaning-making. Our results show that the new display made a difference in that it 1) generally increased the viewing times of the artworks; 2) clearly extended the reading times of labels; and 3) deepened visitors' engagement with the artworks in their exhibition reflections. In contrast, interest in specific artworks and art form preferences proved to be robust and independent of presentation modes.

KW - Art perception

KW - Attention

KW - Exhibition display

KW - Mobile eye tracking

KW - Museum studies

KW - Social influences

KW - Usability

KW - Visitor research

KW - Digital media

KW - Media and communication studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090993489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.16910/jemr.13.2.6

DO - 10.16910/jemr.13.2.6

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 33828792

AN - SCOPUS:85090993489

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Eye Movement Research

JF - Journal of Eye Movement Research

SN - 1995-8692

IS - 2

M1 - 6

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed