The conjunction fallacy and the many meanings of and

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Ralph Hertwig
  • Björn Benz
  • Stefan Krauss

According to the conjunction rule, the probability of A and B cannot exceed the probability of either single event. This rule reads and in terms of the logical operator ∧, interpreting A and B as an intersection of two events. As linguists have long argued, in natural language "and" can convey a wide range of relationships between conjuncts such as temporal order ("I went to the store and bought some whisky"), causal relationships ("Smile and the world smiles with you"), and can indicate a collection of sets rather than their intersection (as in "He invited friends and colleagues to the party"). When "and" is used in word problems researching the conjunction fallacy, the conjunction rule, which assumes the logical operator ∧, therefore cannot be mechanically invoked as a norm. Across several studies, we used different methods of probing people's understanding of and-conjunctions, and found evidence that many of those respondents who violated the conjunction rule in their probability or frequency judgments inferred a meaning of and that differs from the logical operator ∧. We argue that these findings have implications for whether judgments involving ambiguous and-conjunctions that violate the conjunction rule should be considered manifestations of fallacious reasoning or of reasonable pragmatic and semantic inferences.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCognition
Volume108
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)740-753
Number of pages14
ISSN0010-0277
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.09.2008

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Comparing apples with oranges? An approach to link TIMSS and the National Educational Panel Study in Germany via equipercentile and IRT methods
  2. Light treatment of a complex problem
  3. Digital Workplace Transformation Triggers a Shift in the HR Identity
  4. The auditor as an element of in- and external corporate governance
  5. Live Sports, Piracy and Uncertainty: Understanding Illegal Streaming Aggregation Platforms
  6. Higher drought sensitivity of radial growth of European beech in managed than in unmanaged forests
  7. Thermal synthesis of a thermochemical heat storage with heat exchanger optimization
  8. Modeling, Identification, and Control for Cyber-Physical Systems Towards Industry 4.0
  9. Ansparabschreibung durch Existenzgründer
  10. Generalizing Trust
  11. The power of putting a label on it
  12. D2R2 2024: Linked Data-driven Resilience Research 2024
  13. Addendum to L. Lauwers and L. Van Liedekerke, “Ultraproducts and aggregation"
  14. For Whom Does It Work? Moderators of Outcome on the Effect of a Transdiagnostic Internet-Based Maintenance Treatment After Inpatient Psychotherapy
  15. Impact of audit committees with independent financial experts on accounting quality
  16. Daily deep acting toward coworkers
  17. How to specify the structure of substituted blade-like zigzag diamondoids
  18. Explicit Apologies in Fictional Telecinematic Discourse
  19. Parameters identification in a permanent magnet three-phase synchronous motor of a city-bus for an intelligent drive assistant
  20. Digitalization in engineering education research and practice
  21. Antecedents and consequences of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help toward refugees
  22. Small Particle Size Magnesium in One-pot Grignard-Zerewitinoff-like Reactions under Mechanochemical Conditions
  23. A Process Perspective on Organizational Failure
  24. Investigation and Modelling of the Influence of Cooling Rates on the Microstructure of AZ91 Alloys
  25. "alterNature" in Drew Hayden Taylor’s The Berlin Blues. Construction and De(con)struction of Contested Spaces
  26. Minimalist Training
  27. Can personal initiative training improve small business success?