Synapses in the Network: Learning in Governance Networks in the Context of Environmental Management

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Synapses in the Network : Learning in Governance Networks in the Context of Environmental Management. / Newig, Jens; Guenther, Dirk; Pahl-Wostl, Claudia.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 15, No. 4, 24, 12.2010.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{4c5caf1681bc460e86455cf95f430d56,
title = "Synapses in the Network: Learning in Governance Networks in the Context of Environmental Management",
abstract = "In the face of apparent failures to govern complex environmental problems by the central state, new modes of governance have been proposed in recent years. Network governance is an emerging concept that has not yet been consolidated. In network governance, processes of (collective) learning become an essential feature. The key issue approached here is the mutual relations between network structure and learning, with the aim of improving environmental management. Up to now, there have been few attempts to apply social network analysis (SNA) to learning and governance issues. Moreover, little research exists that draws on structural characteristics of networks as a whole, as opposed to actor-related network measures. Given the ambiguities of the concepts at stake, we begin by explicating our understanding of both networks and learning. In doing so, we identify the pertinent challenge of individual as opposed to collective actors that make up a governance network. We introduce three learning-related functions that networks can perform to different degrees: information transmission, deliberation, and resilience. We address two main research questions: (1) What are the characteristics of networks that foster collective learning in each of the three dimensions? To this end, we consider SNA-based network measures such as network size, density, cohesion, centralization, or the occurrence of weak as opposed to strong ties. (2) How does collective learning alter network structures? We conclude by outlining a number of open issues for further research.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, collaboration, collective learning, deliberation, effectiveness, information diffusion, network governance, network resilience, social network analysis, Collaboration, Collective learning, Deliberation, Effectiveness, Information diffusion, Network governance, Network resilience, Social network analysis",
author = "Jens Newig and Dirk Guenther and Claudia Pahl-Wostl",
year = "2010",
month = dec,
doi = "10.5751/ES-03713-150424",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synapses in the Network

T2 - Learning in Governance Networks in the Context of Environmental Management

AU - Newig, Jens

AU - Guenther, Dirk

AU - Pahl-Wostl, Claudia

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - In the face of apparent failures to govern complex environmental problems by the central state, new modes of governance have been proposed in recent years. Network governance is an emerging concept that has not yet been consolidated. In network governance, processes of (collective) learning become an essential feature. The key issue approached here is the mutual relations between network structure and learning, with the aim of improving environmental management. Up to now, there have been few attempts to apply social network analysis (SNA) to learning and governance issues. Moreover, little research exists that draws on structural characteristics of networks as a whole, as opposed to actor-related network measures. Given the ambiguities of the concepts at stake, we begin by explicating our understanding of both networks and learning. In doing so, we identify the pertinent challenge of individual as opposed to collective actors that make up a governance network. We introduce three learning-related functions that networks can perform to different degrees: information transmission, deliberation, and resilience. We address two main research questions: (1) What are the characteristics of networks that foster collective learning in each of the three dimensions? To this end, we consider SNA-based network measures such as network size, density, cohesion, centralization, or the occurrence of weak as opposed to strong ties. (2) How does collective learning alter network structures? We conclude by outlining a number of open issues for further research.

AB - In the face of apparent failures to govern complex environmental problems by the central state, new modes of governance have been proposed in recent years. Network governance is an emerging concept that has not yet been consolidated. In network governance, processes of (collective) learning become an essential feature. The key issue approached here is the mutual relations between network structure and learning, with the aim of improving environmental management. Up to now, there have been few attempts to apply social network analysis (SNA) to learning and governance issues. Moreover, little research exists that draws on structural characteristics of networks as a whole, as opposed to actor-related network measures. Given the ambiguities of the concepts at stake, we begin by explicating our understanding of both networks and learning. In doing so, we identify the pertinent challenge of individual as opposed to collective actors that make up a governance network. We introduce three learning-related functions that networks can perform to different degrees: information transmission, deliberation, and resilience. We address two main research questions: (1) What are the characteristics of networks that foster collective learning in each of the three dimensions? To this end, we consider SNA-based network measures such as network size, density, cohesion, centralization, or the occurrence of weak as opposed to strong ties. (2) How does collective learning alter network structures? We conclude by outlining a number of open issues for further research.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - collaboration

KW - collective learning

KW - deliberation

KW - effectiveness

KW - information diffusion

KW - network governance

KW - network resilience

KW - social network analysis

KW - Collaboration

KW - Collective learning

KW - Deliberation

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Information diffusion

KW - Network governance

KW - Network resilience

KW - Social network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651492298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a27048e7-998e-37bf-b736-48c4b8d5850d/

U2 - 10.5751/ES-03713-150424

DO - 10.5751/ES-03713-150424

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 15

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 4

M1 - 24

ER -

Documents

DOI