Surveying the FAIRness of Annotation Tools: Difficult to find, difficult to reuse
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Article in conference proceedings › Research › peer-review
Authors
In the realm of Machine Learning and Deep Learning, there is a need for high-quality annotated data to train and evaluate supervised models. An extensive number of annotation tools have been developed to facilitate the data labelling process. However, finding the right tool is a demanding task involving thorough searching and testing. Hence, to effectively navigate the multitude of tools, it becomes essential to ensure their findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR). This survey addresses the FAIRness of existing annotation software by evaluating 50 different tools against the FAIR principles for research software (FAIR4RS). The study indicates that while being accessible and interoperable, annotation tools are difficult to find and reuse. In addition, there is a need to establish community standards for annotation software development, documentation, and distribution.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | LAW 2024 - 18th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Co-located with EACL 2024 - Proceedings of the Workshop : Proceedings of the Workshop |
Editors | Sophie Henning, Manfred Stede |
Number of pages | 17 |
Place of Publication | Stroudsburg |
Publisher | Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) |
Publication date | 01.03.2024 |
Pages | 29-45 |
ISBN (electronic) | 979-8-89176-073-8 |
Publication status | Published - 01.03.2024 |
Event | 18th Linguistic Annotation Workshop - St. Julians, Malta Duration: 21.03.2024 → 22.03.2024 Conference number: 18 https://www.aclweb.org/portal/content/first-call-papers-18th-linguistic-annotation-workshop |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Business informatics