Stretch goals and backcasting: Approaches for overcoming barriers to large-scale ecological restoration
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Restoration Ecology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 01.12.2006, p. 487-492.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Stretch goals and backcasting: Approaches for overcoming barriers to large-scale ecological restoration
AU - Manning, A. D.
AU - Lindenmayer, D. B.
AU - Fischer, Jörn
N1 - Times Cited: 11
PY - 2006/12/1
Y1 - 2006/12/1
N2 - The destruction and transformation of ecosystems by humans threatens biodiversity, ecosystem function, and vital ecosystem services. Ecological repair of ecosystems will be a major challenge over the next century and beyond. Restoration efforts to date have frequently been ad hoc, and site or situation specific. Although such small-scale efforts are vitally important, without large-scale visions and coordination, it is unlikely that large functioning ecosystems will ever be constructed by chance through the cumulative effects of small-scale projects. Although the problems of human-induced environmental degradation and the need for a solution are widely recognized, these issues have rarely been addressed on a sufficiently large-scale basis. There are numerous barriers that prevent large-scale ecological restoration projects from being proposed, initiated, or carried through. Common barriers include the "shifting baseline syndrome," the scale and complexity of restoration, the long-term and open-ended nature of restoration, funding challenges, and preemptive constraint of vision. Two potentially useful approaches that could help overcome these barriers are stretch goals and backcasting. Stretch goals are ambitious long-term goals used to inspire creativity and innovation to achieve outcomes that currently seem impossible. Backcasting is a technique where a desired end point is visualized, and then a pathway to that end point is worked out retrospectively. A case study from the Scottish Highlands is used to illustrate how stretch goals and backcasting could facilitate large-scale restoration. The combination of these approaches offers ways to evaluate and shape options for the future of ecosystems, rather than accepting that future ecosystems are victims of past and present political realities.
AB - The destruction and transformation of ecosystems by humans threatens biodiversity, ecosystem function, and vital ecosystem services. Ecological repair of ecosystems will be a major challenge over the next century and beyond. Restoration efforts to date have frequently been ad hoc, and site or situation specific. Although such small-scale efforts are vitally important, without large-scale visions and coordination, it is unlikely that large functioning ecosystems will ever be constructed by chance through the cumulative effects of small-scale projects. Although the problems of human-induced environmental degradation and the need for a solution are widely recognized, these issues have rarely been addressed on a sufficiently large-scale basis. There are numerous barriers that prevent large-scale ecological restoration projects from being proposed, initiated, or carried through. Common barriers include the "shifting baseline syndrome," the scale and complexity of restoration, the long-term and open-ended nature of restoration, funding challenges, and preemptive constraint of vision. Two potentially useful approaches that could help overcome these barriers are stretch goals and backcasting. Stretch goals are ambitious long-term goals used to inspire creativity and innovation to achieve outcomes that currently seem impossible. Backcasting is a technique where a desired end point is visualized, and then a pathway to that end point is worked out retrospectively. A case study from the Scottish Highlands is used to illustrate how stretch goals and backcasting could facilitate large-scale restoration. The combination of these approaches offers ways to evaluate and shape options for the future of ecosystems, rather than accepting that future ecosystems are victims of past and present political realities.
KW - Biology
KW - adaptive management
KW - backcasting
KW - ecological restoration
KW - guiding image
KW - milestones
KW - restoration ecology
KW - scenario planning
KW - shifting baselines
KW - stretch goals
KW - Environmental planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751069066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/de1c31d2-2c36-35df-8673-4af2955ebd74/
U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00159.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00159.x
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 14
SP - 487
EP - 492
JO - Restoration Ecology
JF - Restoration Ecology
SN - 1061-2971
IS - 4
ER -