Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Context: The variation in spatial distribution between ecosystem services can be high. Hence, there is a need to spatially identify important sites for conservation planning. The term ‘ecosystem service hotspot’ has often been used for this purpose, but definitions of this term are ambiguous. Objectives: We review and classify methods to spatially delineate hotspots. We test how spatial configuration of hotspots for a set of ecosystem services differs depending on the applied method. We compare the outcomes to a heuristic site prioritisation approach (Marxan). Methods: The four tested hotspot methods are top richest cells, spatial clustering, intensity, and richness. In a conservation scenario we set a target of conserving 10 % of the quantity of five regulating and cultural services for the forest area of Telemark county, Norway. Results: Spatial configuration of selected areas as retrieved by the four hotspots and Marxan differed considerably. Pairwise comparisons were at the lower end of the scale of the Kappa statistic (0.11–0.27). The outcomes also differed considerably in mean target achievement, cost-effectiveness in terms of land-area needed per unit target achievement and compactness in terms of edge-to-area ratio. Conclusions: An ecosystem service hotspot can refer to either areas containing high values of one service or areas with multiple services. Differences in spatial configuration among hotspot methods can lead to uncertainties for decision-making. This also has consequences for analysing the spatial co-occurrence of hotspots of multiple services and of services and biodiversity.

Original languageEnglish
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume31
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)431-450
Number of pages20
ISSN0921-2973
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.02.2016
Externally publishedYes

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Psychological group-treatments of social anxiety disorder
  2. Kollaborative Wissensnetzwerke in "Lernenden Verwaltungen"
  3. Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management
  4. The reputation costs of executive misconduct accusations
  5. Environmental and operational sustainability of airports
  6. Nachhaltigkeitssteuerung in der öffentlichen Verwaltung
  7. Lerngelegenheiten im niedersächsischen Langzeitpraktikum
  8. Kinetic modeling of active plasma resonance spectroscopy
  9. Engaging Teacher Educators with the Sustainability Agenda
  10. Agenda 21 und Universität - auch eine Frage der Gesundheit?
  11. Improvements in Flexibility depend on Stretching Duration
  12. Value of large-scale linear networks for bird conservation
  13. Metacommunity, mainland-island system or island communities?
  14. Ontologiebasierte Repräsentation von Integrationsprofilen
  15. Das Mitch-Spiel-Spiel - Ein Würfelspiel mit, für und über MKL
  16. Wirtschaftlichkeit des Kanalpumpspeichers Elbe-Seitenkanal
  17. Education in green chemistry and in sustainable chemistry
  18. Wirkungsmessung in Social Entrepreneurship Organisationen
  19. Integrated driver rostering problem in public bus transit
  20. Motive für die Wahl des Studiengangs Wirtschaftspädagogik
  21. Forschungs- und Entwicklungsprojekte als diskursive Arenen
  22. Explaining age and gender differences in employment rates
  23. Entrance fees as a subjective barrier to visiting museums
  24. Der grenzüberschreitende Formwechsel in Europa nach Polbud
  25. Closed-Loop Supply Chain Management - Eine Simulationsstudie
  26. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability
  27. Sustainable use of ecosystem services under multiple risks
  28. Nutzung von Daten für die Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung
  29. Vision-Based Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting Potholes