Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Context: The variation in spatial distribution between ecosystem services can be high. Hence, there is a need to spatially identify important sites for conservation planning. The term ‘ecosystem service hotspot’ has often been used for this purpose, but definitions of this term are ambiguous. Objectives: We review and classify methods to spatially delineate hotspots. We test how spatial configuration of hotspots for a set of ecosystem services differs depending on the applied method. We compare the outcomes to a heuristic site prioritisation approach (Marxan). Methods: The four tested hotspot methods are top richest cells, spatial clustering, intensity, and richness. In a conservation scenario we set a target of conserving 10 % of the quantity of five regulating and cultural services for the forest area of Telemark county, Norway. Results: Spatial configuration of selected areas as retrieved by the four hotspots and Marxan differed considerably. Pairwise comparisons were at the lower end of the scale of the Kappa statistic (0.11–0.27). The outcomes also differed considerably in mean target achievement, cost-effectiveness in terms of land-area needed per unit target achievement and compactness in terms of edge-to-area ratio. Conclusions: An ecosystem service hotspot can refer to either areas containing high values of one service or areas with multiple services. Differences in spatial configuration among hotspot methods can lead to uncertainties for decision-making. This also has consequences for analysing the spatial co-occurrence of hotspots of multiple services and of services and biodiversity.

Original languageEnglish
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume31
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)431-450
Number of pages20
ISSN0921-2973
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.02.2016
Externally publishedYes

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Istron-Tagung 2008
  2. IMISCOE (Verlag)
  3. Internes Anti-Rassismus-Training
  4. HOW SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING CONTRIBUTES TO IMPROVED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL
  5. The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational justice in the use of ecosystems and their services. An ecological-economic mode.
  6. Sonic Spaces and Playfulness
  7. The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational justice in the use of ecosystems and their services
  8. Investigating the relationship between teachers' acceptance and use of educational technology and student data
  9. Processes of Sustainability Transformation. An inter- and transdisciplinary project
  10. Empathic Healthcare Chatbots: Comparing the Effects of Emotional Expression and Caring Behavior
  11. Kunstuniversität Linz
  12. Aesthetics of complexity, artists and resilient communities in urban anthropo-scenes
  13. From the Environmental State to the Sustainability State? Conceptualization, Indicators, and Examples
  14. 2nd Interdisciplinary Insights on Fraud and Corruption - I2FC 2014
  15. Universität von St. Andrews
  16. Der "als-ob" Modus: Polizei, Protest, Staatlichkeit
  17. Experimente in den Sozialwissenschaften: Methodenkurs
  18. Stimmtraining - 2009
  19. From Traditional Games to Digital Games: Predigital Precursors of Gamification
  20. “Relying on Spontaneity”
  21. Student Gender and Teachers' Grading and Written Feedback on Math or Language Assignments
  22. New Energy for a Better World
  23. Modern Language Association (Externe Organisation)
  24. Netzwerk Migrationsrecht (Externe Organisation)
  25. “Research Methods and Methodologies”
  26. Workshop Open Educational Ressourcen für das Sprachenlernen
  27. Predicting long-term survival chances of newly founded business ventures: Bearing uncertainty versus managing uncertainty
  28. Educating the Educators II