Rechte an Immaterialgütern - Eine kantische Perspektive
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Standard
In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, Vol. 52, No. 5, 01.10.2004, p. 739-753.
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Rechte an Immaterialgütern - Eine kantische Perspektive
AU - Schefczyk, Michael
PY - 2004/10/1
Y1 - 2004/10/1
N2 - The article distinguishes two models of self-realization. The independence model claims that self-realization is compatible with leading a non-moral life, whereas the dependence model argues the converse. Hegel′s influential version of the dependence model aims at showing why and how self-realization must be embedded in a complex structure of reasonable social relations. I argue that Hegel′s dependence model abrogates the „Recht der Besonderheit, sich befriedigt zu finden” and is thus not convincing. What I call Hegel′s “inofficial theory”, however, concedes an infusible conflict between modernity and self-realization; philosophy has to reconcile the individual with the impossibility of being a „ganzer Mensch” in modern societies. After an interlude with Michael Theunissen′s indpendence model, I turn to T. H. Green′s theory of self-realization. Green provides a richer explanatory story than Hegel as to why other-regarding acts contribute to self-realization; however, this story leaves not enough conceptual room for interpersonal conflict and is vulnerable to similar objections to Hegel′s account.
AB - The article distinguishes two models of self-realization. The independence model claims that self-realization is compatible with leading a non-moral life, whereas the dependence model argues the converse. Hegel′s influential version of the dependence model aims at showing why and how self-realization must be embedded in a complex structure of reasonable social relations. I argue that Hegel′s dependence model abrogates the „Recht der Besonderheit, sich befriedigt zu finden” and is thus not convincing. What I call Hegel′s “inofficial theory”, however, concedes an infusible conflict between modernity and self-realization; philosophy has to reconcile the individual with the impossibility of being a „ganzer Mensch” in modern societies. After an interlude with Michael Theunissen′s indpendence model, I turn to T. H. Green′s theory of self-realization. Green provides a richer explanatory story than Hegel as to why other-regarding acts contribute to self-realization; however, this story leaves not enough conceptual room for interpersonal conflict and is vulnerable to similar objections to Hegel′s account.
KW - Philosophie
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61049240252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/cfc6e6c4-dd06-38d1-8fc8-6e065238f626/
U2 - 10.1524/dzph.2004.52.5.739
DO - 10.1524/dzph.2004.52.5.739
M3 - Übersichtsarbeiten
VL - 52
SP - 739
EP - 753
JO - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
JF - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
SN - 0012-1045
IS - 5
ER -