Political Representation in the EU: A second transformation?

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Standard

Political Representation in the EU: A second transformation? / Friedrich, Dawid; Kroeger, Sandra.
The Challenge of Democratic Representation in the European Union. ed. / Dawid Friedrich; Sandra Kroeger. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. p. 3-20.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Harvard

Friedrich, D & Kroeger, S 2012, Political Representation in the EU: A second transformation? in D Friedrich & S Kroeger (eds), The Challenge of Democratic Representation in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, pp. 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355828_1

APA

Friedrich, D., & Kroeger, S. (2012). Political Representation in the EU: A second transformation? In D. Friedrich, & S. Kroeger (Eds.), The Challenge of Democratic Representation in the European Union (pp. 3-20). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355828_1

Vancouver

Friedrich D, Kroeger S. Political Representation in the EU: A second transformation? In Friedrich D, Kroeger S, editors, The Challenge of Democratic Representation in the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 2012. p. 3-20 doi: 10.1057/9780230355828_1

Bibtex

@inbook{ecd6075b1d534c179d33e899d5415d4d,
title = "Political Representation in the EU: A second transformation?",
abstract = "Since the Maastricht Treaty (1992), the reality of a deepening European integration process has ended the (assumed) {\textquoteleft}permissive consensus{\textquoteright} among the European people that had sustained early phases of the integration process. Since then, an intensive debate about what is now called {\textquoteleft}the EU{\textquoteright}s democratic deficit{\textquoteright} has grown and continues to gain momentum. The legitimacy crisis of the EU appears to be too strong, as policy-making is seen as distant, non-transparent, and not in line with institutional checks and balances at the nation-state level. While increasingly affected by European integration, many European citizens believe that they have little say in European decision-making, a situation described as {\textquoteleft}policies without politics{\textquoteright} (Schmidt 2006: 5). Accordingly, several EU - related referenda have resulted in a majority of ʼno{\textquoteright} votes, clearly expressing that the people want to have a say and want to be represented in European policy-making.",
keywords = "Politics, Repr{\"a}sentation <Politik> , Europ{\"a}ische Demokratie, Europ{\"a}ische Union , civil society organization, descriptive representation, political representation, representative democracy, representative government",
author = "Dawid Friedrich and Sandra Kroeger",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1057/9780230355828_1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-230-29292-5",
pages = "3--20",
editor = "Dawid Friedrich and Sandra Kroeger",
booktitle = "The Challenge of Democratic Representation in the European Union",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Political Representation in the EU

T2 - A second transformation?

AU - Friedrich, Dawid

AU - Kroeger, Sandra

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Since the Maastricht Treaty (1992), the reality of a deepening European integration process has ended the (assumed) ‘permissive consensus’ among the European people that had sustained early phases of the integration process. Since then, an intensive debate about what is now called ‘the EU’s democratic deficit’ has grown and continues to gain momentum. The legitimacy crisis of the EU appears to be too strong, as policy-making is seen as distant, non-transparent, and not in line with institutional checks and balances at the nation-state level. While increasingly affected by European integration, many European citizens believe that they have little say in European decision-making, a situation described as ‘policies without politics’ (Schmidt 2006: 5). Accordingly, several EU - related referenda have resulted in a majority of ʼno’ votes, clearly expressing that the people want to have a say and want to be represented in European policy-making.

AB - Since the Maastricht Treaty (1992), the reality of a deepening European integration process has ended the (assumed) ‘permissive consensus’ among the European people that had sustained early phases of the integration process. Since then, an intensive debate about what is now called ‘the EU’s democratic deficit’ has grown and continues to gain momentum. The legitimacy crisis of the EU appears to be too strong, as policy-making is seen as distant, non-transparent, and not in line with institutional checks and balances at the nation-state level. While increasingly affected by European integration, many European citizens believe that they have little say in European decision-making, a situation described as ‘policies without politics’ (Schmidt 2006: 5). Accordingly, several EU - related referenda have resulted in a majority of ʼno’ votes, clearly expressing that the people want to have a say and want to be represented in European policy-making.

KW - Politics

KW - Repräsentation <Politik>

KW - Europäische Demokratie

KW - Europäische Union

KW - civil society organization

KW - descriptive representation

KW - political representation

KW - representative democracy

KW - representative government

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015815144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/9780230355828_1

DO - 10.1057/9780230355828_1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-0-230-29292-5

SN - 978-1-349-33260-1

SP - 3

EP - 20

BT - The Challenge of Democratic Representation in the European Union

A2 - Friedrich, Dawid

A2 - Kroeger, Sandra

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Houndmills

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Playing the past to understand the present
  2. Constructing small talk in learner-native speaker voice-based telecollaboration
  3. Logistics under Construction
  4. Spatial characterization of social-ecological systems units for management in Tropical Dry Forests
  5. Who participates in which type of teacher professional development?
  6. From the environmental state to the sustainability state? Conceptualization, indicators, and examples
  7. Mysthik
  8. § 289a HGB
  9. Exploring the influence of testimonial source on attitudes towards e-mental health interventions among university students
  10. Das Wissen des Profils
  11. Text und Technik
  12. Probleme und Strategien der Langzeitarchivierung multimedialer Objekte
  13. Institutionen für eine transformative Forschung
  14. Leveraging Biodiversity Action From Plural Values
  15. Environmental Management Accounting for Staff Appraisal
  16. Optimales Anlagevermögen von Versicherungsunternehmen
  17. Freiheit durch Bindung
  18. Communication constitutes organization
  19. 'Crawling Jurisdiction'
  20. The Third Image
  21. The Effects of Altruism and Social Background in an Online-Based, Pay-What-You-Want Situation
  22. Focus on opportunities as a boundary condition of the relationship between job control and work engagement: A multi-sample, multi-method study
  23. Asking elaborate questions: Focus groups and the management of spontaneity
  24. Preferences and policy - Consuming art and culture in Baltimore and Hamburg
  25. Veränderungen in den Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsstrukturen
  26. A Universal Digital Stress Management Intervention for Employees
  27. Der Verlust der Dinge
  28. When and how does anger during goal pursuit relate to goal achievement? The roles of persistence and action planning