Ownership mode, cultural distance, and the extent of parent firms’ strategic control over subsidiaries in the PRC

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Ownership mode, cultural distance, and the extent of parent firms’ strategic control over subsidiaries in the PRC. / Puck, Jonas; Hödl, Markus K.; Filatotchev, Igor et al.

In: Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 1075-1105.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3af55d20ab6944108b0f8e53c82a65df,
title = "Ownership mode, cultural distance, and the extent of parent firms{\textquoteright} strategic control over subsidiaries in the PRC",
abstract = "Previous studies often associated a specific type of ownership mode with the extent of control a parent firm may have over (strategic) decision-making in a foreign subsidiary, suggesting that parent firms should have higher control over wholly-owned subsidiaries (WoS) than international joint ventures (IJVs). Building on principal agent theory, we argue that in the Chinese context higher ownership levels do not necessarily have a positive effect on the extent of control over the foreign subsidiary. We further argue that cultural distance between the parent firm and the subsidiary moderates this relationship. We test our hypotheses using data from a sample of 156 foreign subsidiaries in the People{\textquoteright}s Republic of China (PRC) and find strong support for our arguments. Our findings show that in WoS parent firms reduce their extent of control, while in IJVs parent firms increase their extent of control. Moreover, we find that extent of control over WoS (IJVs) declines (increases) when cultural distance increases. Our results have significant theoretical implications for international business (IB) research as they challenge existing views with regard to the relationship between ownership mode and control as well as the moderating effect of cultural distance.",
keywords = "Management studies, Control, Cultural distance, Ownership mode, Subsidiaries",
author = "Jonas Puck and H{\"o}dl, {Markus K.} and Igor Filatotchev and Wolff, {Hans Georg} and Benjamin Bader",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10490-016-9471-2",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1075--1105",
journal = "Asia Pacific Journal of Management",
issn = "0217-4561",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ownership mode, cultural distance, and the extent of parent firms’ strategic control over subsidiaries in the PRC

AU - Puck, Jonas

AU - Hödl, Markus K.

AU - Filatotchev, Igor

AU - Wolff, Hans Georg

AU - Bader, Benjamin

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Previous studies often associated a specific type of ownership mode with the extent of control a parent firm may have over (strategic) decision-making in a foreign subsidiary, suggesting that parent firms should have higher control over wholly-owned subsidiaries (WoS) than international joint ventures (IJVs). Building on principal agent theory, we argue that in the Chinese context higher ownership levels do not necessarily have a positive effect on the extent of control over the foreign subsidiary. We further argue that cultural distance between the parent firm and the subsidiary moderates this relationship. We test our hypotheses using data from a sample of 156 foreign subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and find strong support for our arguments. Our findings show that in WoS parent firms reduce their extent of control, while in IJVs parent firms increase their extent of control. Moreover, we find that extent of control over WoS (IJVs) declines (increases) when cultural distance increases. Our results have significant theoretical implications for international business (IB) research as they challenge existing views with regard to the relationship between ownership mode and control as well as the moderating effect of cultural distance.

AB - Previous studies often associated a specific type of ownership mode with the extent of control a parent firm may have over (strategic) decision-making in a foreign subsidiary, suggesting that parent firms should have higher control over wholly-owned subsidiaries (WoS) than international joint ventures (IJVs). Building on principal agent theory, we argue that in the Chinese context higher ownership levels do not necessarily have a positive effect on the extent of control over the foreign subsidiary. We further argue that cultural distance between the parent firm and the subsidiary moderates this relationship. We test our hypotheses using data from a sample of 156 foreign subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and find strong support for our arguments. Our findings show that in WoS parent firms reduce their extent of control, while in IJVs parent firms increase their extent of control. Moreover, we find that extent of control over WoS (IJVs) declines (increases) when cultural distance increases. Our results have significant theoretical implications for international business (IB) research as they challenge existing views with regard to the relationship between ownership mode and control as well as the moderating effect of cultural distance.

KW - Management studies

KW - Control

KW - Cultural distance

KW - Ownership mode

KW - Subsidiaries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969913337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2d66793d-51fa-3e27-92b0-3170eb5120c1/

U2 - 10.1007/s10490-016-9471-2

DO - 10.1007/s10490-016-9471-2

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84969913337

VL - 33

SP - 1075

EP - 1105

JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Management

JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Management

SN - 0217-4561

IS - 4

ER -