Overview of Non-Apis Bees

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Standard

Overview of Non-Apis Bees. / Vaughan, Mace; Vaissière, Bernard; Maynard, Glynn et al.
Pesticide Risk Assessment for Pollinators. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia, 2014. p. 5-18.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Harvard

Vaughan, M, Vaissière, B, Maynard, G, Kasina, M, Nocelli, RCF, Scott-Dupree, C, Johansen, E, Brittain, C, Coulson, M & Dinter, A 2014, Overview of Non-Apis Bees. in Pesticide Risk Assessment for Pollinators. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia, pp. 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118852408.ch3

APA

Vaughan, M., Vaissière, B., Maynard, G., Kasina, M., Nocelli, R. C. F., Scott-Dupree, C., Johansen, E., Brittain, C., Coulson, M., & Dinter, A. (2014). Overview of Non-Apis Bees. In Pesticide Risk Assessment for Pollinators (pp. 5-18). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118852408.ch3

Vancouver

Vaughan M, Vaissière B, Maynard G, Kasina M, Nocelli RCF, Scott-Dupree C et al. Overview of Non-Apis Bees. In Pesticide Risk Assessment for Pollinators. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. 2014. p. 5-18 doi: 10.1002/9781118852408.ch3

Bibtex

@inbook{95d7cd9ecb95437e93ef47daa38a6758,
title = "Overview of Non-Apis Bees",
abstract = "Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) are frequently employed in pesticide toxicity testing either as a representative species (i.e., surrogate) for pollinating insects (such as in the European Union (EU)) or in other cases to represent other non-target terrestrial invertebrates. Bees exhibit a wide range of social behaviors, but depending on their interdependency, bees can be broadly divided into two groups: social or solitary. Most of the non-Apis bee toxicity testing conducted in Europe has been on bumble bees, and in particular Bombus terrestris, which is the main species used for commercial pollination. It is clear that non-Apis bees play an important role in supporting diverse plant communities, and an increasingly important role in agriculture. They differ from honey bees in their biological characteristics, which consequently may make them subject to unique exposure routes, as well as unique challenges when it comes to risk management.",
keywords = "Bumble bees, Honey bees, Non-Apis Bee, Pesticide, Risk management, Toxicity test, Biology, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Mace Vaughan and Bernard Vaissi{\`e}re and Glynn Maynard and Muo Kasina and Nocelli, {Roberta C.F.} and Cynthia Scott-Dupree and Erik Johansen and Claire Brittain and Mike Coulson and Axel Dinter",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1002/9781118852408.ch3",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781118852521",
pages = "5--18",
booktitle = "Pesticide Risk Assessment for Pollinators",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia",
address = "Australia",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Overview of Non-Apis Bees

AU - Vaughan, Mace

AU - Vaissière, Bernard

AU - Maynard, Glynn

AU - Kasina, Muo

AU - Nocelli, Roberta C.F.

AU - Scott-Dupree, Cynthia

AU - Johansen, Erik

AU - Brittain, Claire

AU - Coulson, Mike

AU - Dinter, Axel

PY - 2014/7/14

Y1 - 2014/7/14

N2 - Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) are frequently employed in pesticide toxicity testing either as a representative species (i.e., surrogate) for pollinating insects (such as in the European Union (EU)) or in other cases to represent other non-target terrestrial invertebrates. Bees exhibit a wide range of social behaviors, but depending on their interdependency, bees can be broadly divided into two groups: social or solitary. Most of the non-Apis bee toxicity testing conducted in Europe has been on bumble bees, and in particular Bombus terrestris, which is the main species used for commercial pollination. It is clear that non-Apis bees play an important role in supporting diverse plant communities, and an increasingly important role in agriculture. They differ from honey bees in their biological characteristics, which consequently may make them subject to unique exposure routes, as well as unique challenges when it comes to risk management.

AB - Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) are frequently employed in pesticide toxicity testing either as a representative species (i.e., surrogate) for pollinating insects (such as in the European Union (EU)) or in other cases to represent other non-target terrestrial invertebrates. Bees exhibit a wide range of social behaviors, but depending on their interdependency, bees can be broadly divided into two groups: social or solitary. Most of the non-Apis bee toxicity testing conducted in Europe has been on bumble bees, and in particular Bombus terrestris, which is the main species used for commercial pollination. It is clear that non-Apis bees play an important role in supporting diverse plant communities, and an increasingly important role in agriculture. They differ from honey bees in their biological characteristics, which consequently may make them subject to unique exposure routes, as well as unique challenges when it comes to risk management.

KW - Bumble bees

KW - Honey bees

KW - Non-Apis Bee

KW - Pesticide

KW - Risk management

KW - Toxicity test

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927684978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/9781118852408.ch3

DO - 10.1002/9781118852408.ch3

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84927684978

SN - 9781118852521

SP - 5

EP - 18

BT - Pesticide Risk Assessment for Pollinators

PB - Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Jacob Hörisch

Publications

  1. Differences in the earnings distribution of self- and dependent employed German men
  2. Front, Field, Line, Plane
  3. I Am Not A Hacker
  4. Abiotic and biotic drivers of tree trait effects on soil microbial biomass and soil carbon concentration
  5. Design and control of an electromagnetic valve actuator
  6. Optimal scheduling for Automated Guided Vehicles (AGV) in blocking job-shops
  7. Experimental evidence for stronger cacao yield limitation by pollination than by plant resources
  8. Is decoupling becoming decoupled from institutional theory?
  9. Macrostructure evolution in directionally solidified Mg-RE alloys
  10. Institutional mirror versus substitute: How regulations affect explicit CSR motivation
  11. Governance approaches to address scale issues in biodiversity management – current situation and ways forward
  12. Levels of indicator development for education for sustainable development
  13. Von Differenz zu Vielfalt zu Super-Diversity
  14. Does adhering to the principles of green finance matter for stock valuation? Evidence from testing for (co-)explosiveness
  15. Explicit Apologies in Fictional Telecinematic Discourse
  16. The theory of socio-cultural evolution
  17. Analyzing pre- and in-service teachers’ feedback practice with microteaching videos
  18. Ideological Foundations of Perceived Contract Breach Associated With Downsizing
  19. Comity
  20. art thinking doing art: Artistic Practices in Educational Contexts from 1900 to Today
  21. The Short-Term Cost of Greening the Global Fleet
  22. Skill learning as a concept in life-span developmental psychology
  23. Thermochemical heat storage materials
  24. Trade Dynamics, Trade Costs and Market Size: First Evidence from the Exporter and Importer Dynamics Database for Germany
  25. Toward spatial fit in the governance of global commodity flows
  26. Introduction: The Political Project of Corbynism
  27. Mapping of Innovation Relations
  28. EFFECT OF RADIAL CLEARANCE ON BALL BEARING'S DYNAMICS USING A 2-DOF MODEL