Organizational ambidexterity and student achievement: Do knowledge exploration and exploitation in schools make a difference?
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, Vol. 10, No. 1, 100636, 01.2025.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Organizational ambidexterity and student achievement
T2 - Do knowledge exploration and exploitation in schools make a difference?
AU - Pietsch, Marcus
AU - Aydin, Burak
AU - Montecinos, Carmen
AU - Bellibaş, Mehmet Şükrü
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - While studies on ambidexterity and its impact on outcomes have been ubiquitous in organizational research, the literature regarding its nature in schools has been scarce and has lacked information about its impact on student achievement. To address this research gap, this study examined the interactive role of the two dimensions of ambidexterity—exploration and exploitation—in accounting for variations in school-level average student achievement in language and math. Additionally, we investigated the moderating role of several school-context variables (school size, school location [rural or urban], student poverty, and school type). We used data from a random sample of 295 schools in Chile, estimated structural equation models, applied response surface analysis, and employed machine learning. The results showed that a high integration of exploration and exploitation, and hence ambidexterity, was significantly related to student achievement. In high-poverty schools, a focus on acquiring new knowledge and exploring innovations can function as a catalyst for reducing the achievement gap. We conclude that the integration of exploration and exploitation in schools could help schools increase student achievement and reduce educational inequalities.
AB - While studies on ambidexterity and its impact on outcomes have been ubiquitous in organizational research, the literature regarding its nature in schools has been scarce and has lacked information about its impact on student achievement. To address this research gap, this study examined the interactive role of the two dimensions of ambidexterity—exploration and exploitation—in accounting for variations in school-level average student achievement in language and math. Additionally, we investigated the moderating role of several school-context variables (school size, school location [rural or urban], student poverty, and school type). We used data from a random sample of 295 schools in Chile, estimated structural equation models, applied response surface analysis, and employed machine learning. The results showed that a high integration of exploration and exploitation, and hence ambidexterity, was significantly related to student achievement. In high-poverty schools, a focus on acquiring new knowledge and exploring innovations can function as a catalyst for reducing the achievement gap. We conclude that the integration of exploration and exploitation in schools could help schools increase student achievement and reduce educational inequalities.
KW - Educational science
KW - Ambidexterity
KW - Exploitation
KW - Exploration
KW - Knowledge
KW - Poverty
KW - Student achievement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211069457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100636
DO - 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100636
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 10
JO - Journal of Innovation and Knowledge
JF - Journal of Innovation and Knowledge
SN - 2530-7614
IS - 1
M1 - 100636
ER -