Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints

Sergiy Smetana; Dusan Ristic; Daniel Pleissner; Hanna L. Tuomisto; Oleksii Parniakov; Volker Heinz

doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831

Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Standard

Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints. / Smetana, Sergiy; Ristic, Dusan; Pleissner, Daniel et al.
In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 190, 106831, 01.03.2023.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Harvard

Smetana, S, Ristic, D, Pleissner, D, Tuomisto, HL, Parniakov, O & Heinz, V 2023, 'Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints', Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 190, 106831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831

APA

Smetana, S., Ristic, D., Pleissner, D., Tuomisto, H. L., Parniakov, O., & Heinz, V. (2023). Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, Article 106831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831

Vancouver

Smetana S, Ristic D, Pleissner D, Tuomisto HL, Parniakov O, Heinz V. Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2023 Mar 1;190:106831. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831

Bibtex

@article{8b043bd4cadd4838a0d2fc816a8e5836,

title = "Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints",

abstract = "The modern food system is characterized with high environmental impact, which is in many cases associated with increased rates of animal production and overconsumption. The adoption of alternatives to meat proteins (insects, plants, mycoprotein, microalgae, cultured meat, etc.) might potentially influence the environmental impact and human health in a positive or negative way but could also trigger indirect impacts with higher consumption rates. Current review provides a condensed analysis on potential environmental impacts, resource consumption rates and unintended trade-offs associated with integration of alternative proteins in complex global food system in the form of meat substitutes. We focus on emissions of greenhouse gases, land use, non-renewable energy use and water footprint highlighted for both ingredients used for meat substitutes and ready products. The benefits and limitations of meat substitution are highlighted in relation to a weight and protein content. The analysis of the recent research literature allowed us to define issues, that require the attention of future studies.",

keywords = "Alternative protein sources, Environmental impact, LCA, Life cycle assessment, Meat alternatives, Meat substitutes, Biology",

author = "Sergiy Smetana and Dusan Ristic and Daniel Pleissner and Tuomisto, {Hanna L.} and Oleksii Parniakov and Volker Heinz",

note = "The study is partially supported by the funding from the European Union...s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 861976 proejct SUSINCHAIN. This document reflects only the authors... views and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. It is also partially funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), in the frame of FACCE-SURPLUS/FACCE-JPI project UpWaste, grant numbers 031B0934 and Era-Net Cofund FOSC-ERA PRogram (Project Climaqua 2821ERA12). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",

year = "2023",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831",

language = "English",

volume = "190",

journal = "Resources, Conservation and Recycling",

issn = "0921-3449",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meat substitutes

T2 - Resource demands and environmental footprints

AU - Smetana, Sergiy

AU - Ristic, Dusan

AU - Pleissner, Daniel

AU - Tuomisto, Hanna L.

AU - Parniakov, Oleksii

AU - Heinz, Volker

N1 - The study is partially supported by the funding from the European Union...s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 861976 proejct SUSINCHAIN. This document reflects only the authors... views and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. It is also partially funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), in the frame of FACCE-SURPLUS/FACCE-JPI project UpWaste, grant numbers 031B0934 and Era-Net Cofund FOSC-ERA PRogram (Project Climaqua 2821ERA12). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)

PY - 2023/3/1

Y1 - 2023/3/1

N2 - The modern food system is characterized with high environmental impact, which is in many cases associated with increased rates of animal production and overconsumption. The adoption of alternatives to meat proteins (insects, plants, mycoprotein, microalgae, cultured meat, etc.) might potentially influence the environmental impact and human health in a positive or negative way but could also trigger indirect impacts with higher consumption rates. Current review provides a condensed analysis on potential environmental impacts, resource consumption rates and unintended trade-offs associated with integration of alternative proteins in complex global food system in the form of meat substitutes. We focus on emissions of greenhouse gases, land use, non-renewable energy use and water footprint highlighted for both ingredients used for meat substitutes and ready products. The benefits and limitations of meat substitution are highlighted in relation to a weight and protein content. The analysis of the recent research literature allowed us to define issues, that require the attention of future studies.

AB - The modern food system is characterized with high environmental impact, which is in many cases associated with increased rates of animal production and overconsumption. The adoption of alternatives to meat proteins (insects, plants, mycoprotein, microalgae, cultured meat, etc.) might potentially influence the environmental impact and human health in a positive or negative way but could also trigger indirect impacts with higher consumption rates. Current review provides a condensed analysis on potential environmental impacts, resource consumption rates and unintended trade-offs associated with integration of alternative proteins in complex global food system in the form of meat substitutes. We focus on emissions of greenhouse gases, land use, non-renewable energy use and water footprint highlighted for both ingredients used for meat substitutes and ready products. The benefits and limitations of meat substitution are highlighted in relation to a weight and protein content. The analysis of the recent research literature allowed us to define issues, that require the attention of future studies.

KW - Alternative protein sources

KW - Environmental impact

KW - LCA

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Meat alternatives

KW - Meat substitutes

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144388154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1a52fdbd-be00-35c2-acf1-3975955cf4c5/

U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831

DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 36874227

AN - SCOPUS:85144388154

VL - 190

JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling

JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling

SN - 0921-3449

M1 - 106831

ER -

Related by journal

Prospective material flow analysis of the end-of-life decommissioning: Case study of a North Sea offshore wind farm

Demuytere, C., Vanderveken, I., Thomassen, G., Godoy León, M. F., De Luca Peña, L. V., Blommaert, C., Vermeir, J. & Dewulf, J., 01.01.2024, In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 200, 8 p., 107283.