Measuring board diversity: A systematic literature review of data sources, constructs, pitfalls, and suggestions for future research

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Authors

The purpose of this systematic literature review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the methods used to measure board diversity. We develop a framework to structure empirical studies and develop an agenda for future research. We selected 61 empirical articles from an initial sample of 1035. This study discusses the different data collection methods. We group director and board attributes into the constructs of structural, demographic, and cognitive diversity. We identify four different approaches to combining and measuring diversity: non-index, single-index, cross-indices, and inter-indices. We find that measuring board diversity requires a mixture of archival and primary research, as well as various methods such as applying indices, constructing heterogeneity scores, and using machine learning approaches to infer directors' attributes. We contribute to research by providing a framework that structures measuring techniques for board diversity, a future research agenda, and insights on potential window-dressing.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Volume31
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)977-992
Number of pages16
ISSN1535-3958
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Richard Welford (Editor-in-Chief) and one anonymous reviewer for their excellent guidance and constructive feedback throughout the review process. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Research areas

  • board attributes, board diversity, cognitive characteristics, measurement, structural characteristics, systematic literature review
  • Management studies

DOI