Ludus non tollit abusum: Zur ethischen Beurteilung virtueller Missbrauchsabbildungen
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Zeitschrift fur Evangelische Ethik, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.01.2023, p. 34-48.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ludus non tollit abusum
T2 - Zur ethischen Beurteilung virtueller Missbrauchsabbildungen
AU - Schreiber, Gerhard
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Guetersloher Verlagshaus. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Virtual child sexual abuse materials featuring realistic representations of children in the form of computer-generated images, rather than real children, have become a growing trend in recent years. How can such virtual images of abuse - which are almost indistinguishable from real images of child abuse - be assessed? What criteria can we use to arrive at an ethically sustainable position? In this paper, I will argue that the production, dissemination, and use of virtual images of abuse are neither justifiable nor excusable from an ethical perspective. To this end, I will present various potential ways of approaching an assessment of such images and will examine each of these approaches with regard to their validity. I will show that consequentialist, deontological, and virtue-ethical approaches are not yet sufficient to support a categorical rejection of virtual images of abuse, and that it is only possible to arrive at a convincing approach if the social-ethical perspective is also taken into account.
AB - Virtual child sexual abuse materials featuring realistic representations of children in the form of computer-generated images, rather than real children, have become a growing trend in recent years. How can such virtual images of abuse - which are almost indistinguishable from real images of child abuse - be assessed? What criteria can we use to arrive at an ethically sustainable position? In this paper, I will argue that the production, dissemination, and use of virtual images of abuse are neither justifiable nor excusable from an ethical perspective. To this end, I will present various potential ways of approaching an assessment of such images and will examine each of these approaches with regard to their validity. I will show that consequentialist, deontological, and virtue-ethical approaches are not yet sufficient to support a categorical rejection of virtual images of abuse, and that it is only possible to arrive at a convincing approach if the social-ethical perspective is also taken into account.
KW - Theologie
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146255210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14315/zee-2023-670106
DO - 10.14315/zee-2023-670106
M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze
AN - SCOPUS:85146255210
VL - 67
SP - 34
EP - 48
JO - Zeitschrift fur Evangelische Ethik
JF - Zeitschrift fur Evangelische Ethik
SN - 0044-2674
IS - 1
ER -