Introduction: The representative turn in EU studies
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Standard
The representative turn in EU studies . ed. / Sandra Kröger; Dawid Friedrich. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis Inc., 2013. p. 1-16 (Journal of European public policy series; Vol. 20, No. 2).
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Introduction: The representative turn in EU studies
AU - Kröger, Sandra
AU - Friedrich, Dawid
N1 - Copyright der Printausgabe 2014, Erscheinungsjahr eBook 2016.
PY - 2013/8/13
Y1 - 2013/8/13
N2 - In everyday discourse, democracy has become associated with representation. Western-style political systems today are generally categorized as representative democracies, as is the EU. The Treaty of Lisbon declares the EU to be founded on representative democracy, with political equality as its normative foundation. However, contemporary processes of diversification, not least that of European integration, pose severe challenges to the historically contingent link between democracy and representation. Consequently, many scholars indicate a democratic deficit in the EU, which the current debt crisis has accentuated even further. This introduction takes stock of recent theoretical debates and identifies three key issues which it then links to the contributions to this collection: namely, (1) a decisive shift in the understanding of the representative relationship; (2) an increased attention to non-electoral representation, specifically civil society (organizations); and (3) the debate about whether democratic competences are best located at the supranational or the national level. We close by reflecting on potential future avenues for research.
AB - In everyday discourse, democracy has become associated with representation. Western-style political systems today are generally categorized as representative democracies, as is the EU. The Treaty of Lisbon declares the EU to be founded on representative democracy, with political equality as its normative foundation. However, contemporary processes of diversification, not least that of European integration, pose severe challenges to the historically contingent link between democracy and representation. Consequently, many scholars indicate a democratic deficit in the EU, which the current debt crisis has accentuated even further. This introduction takes stock of recent theoretical debates and identifies three key issues which it then links to the contributions to this collection: namely, (1) a decisive shift in the understanding of the representative relationship; (2) an increased attention to non-electoral representation, specifically civil society (organizations); and (3) the debate about whether democratic competences are best located at the supranational or the national level. We close by reflecting on potential future avenues for research.
KW - Politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977765512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies
AN - SCOPUS:84977765512
SN - 9780415836029
T3 - Journal of European public policy series
SP - 1
EP - 16
BT - The representative turn in EU studies
A2 - Kröger, Sandra
A2 - Friedrich, Dawid
PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.
CY - Abingdon
ER -