Inside honeybee hives: Impact of natural propolis on the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor and viruses

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Inside honeybee hives: Impact of natural propolis on the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor and viruses. / Drescher, Nora; Klein, Alexandra Maria; Neumann, Peter et al.
In: Insects, Vol. 8, No. 1, 15, 01.03.2017.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9b76c033cd274b48810a68b448b5429f,
title = "Inside honeybee hives: Impact of natural propolis on the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor and viruses",
abstract = "Social immunity is a key factor for honeybee health, including behavioral defense strategies such as the collective use of antimicrobial plant resins (propolis). While laboratory data repeatedly show significant propolis effects, field data are scarce, especially at the colony level. Here, we investigated whether propolis, as naturally deposited in the nests, can protect honeybees against ectoparasitic mites Varroa destructor and associated viruses, which are currently considered the most serious biological threat to European honeybee subspecies, Apis mellifera, globally. Propolis intake of 10 field colonies was manipulated by either reducing or adding freshly collected propolis. Mite infestations, titers of deformed wing virus (DWV) and sacbrood virus (SBV), resin intake, as well as colony strength were recorded monthly from July to September 2013. We additionally examined the effect of raw propolis volatiles on mite survival in laboratory assays. Our results showed no significant effects of adding or removing propolis on mite survival and infestation levels. However, in relation to V. destructor, DWV titers increased significantly less in colonies with added propolis than in propolis-removed colonies, whereas SBV titers were similar. Colonies with added propolis were also significantly stronger than propolis-removed colonies. These findings indicate that propolis may interfere with the dynamics of V. destructor-transmitted viruses, thereby further emphasizing the importance of propolis for honeybee health.",
keywords = "Apis mellifera, Deformed wing virus, Plant-insect interactions, Resin, Sacbrood virus, Social immunity, Ecosystems Research, Sustainability Science",
author = "Nora Drescher and Klein, {Alexandra Maria} and Peter Neumann and Orlando Ya{\~n}ez and Leonhardt, {Sara D.}",
note = "Funding Information: Financial support was granted by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and the Vinetum Foundation to Peter Neumann and Orlando Ya{\~n}ez, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG project: LE 2750/1-1) to Sara D. Leonhardt. Nora Drescher was supported by the Leuphana University of L{\"u}neburg. Kaspar Roth is greatly acknowledged for technical laboratory support and Manfred L{\"u}tke for assistance with practical beekeeping. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/insects8010015",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Insects",
issn = "2075-4450",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inside honeybee hives

T2 - Impact of natural propolis on the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor and viruses

AU - Drescher, Nora

AU - Klein, Alexandra Maria

AU - Neumann, Peter

AU - Yañez, Orlando

AU - Leonhardt, Sara D.

N1 - Funding Information: Financial support was granted by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and the Vinetum Foundation to Peter Neumann and Orlando Yañez, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG project: LE 2750/1-1) to Sara D. Leonhardt. Nora Drescher was supported by the Leuphana University of Lüneburg. Kaspar Roth is greatly acknowledged for technical laboratory support and Manfred Lütke for assistance with practical beekeeping. Publisher Copyright: © 2017 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Social immunity is a key factor for honeybee health, including behavioral defense strategies such as the collective use of antimicrobial plant resins (propolis). While laboratory data repeatedly show significant propolis effects, field data are scarce, especially at the colony level. Here, we investigated whether propolis, as naturally deposited in the nests, can protect honeybees against ectoparasitic mites Varroa destructor and associated viruses, which are currently considered the most serious biological threat to European honeybee subspecies, Apis mellifera, globally. Propolis intake of 10 field colonies was manipulated by either reducing or adding freshly collected propolis. Mite infestations, titers of deformed wing virus (DWV) and sacbrood virus (SBV), resin intake, as well as colony strength were recorded monthly from July to September 2013. We additionally examined the effect of raw propolis volatiles on mite survival in laboratory assays. Our results showed no significant effects of adding or removing propolis on mite survival and infestation levels. However, in relation to V. destructor, DWV titers increased significantly less in colonies with added propolis than in propolis-removed colonies, whereas SBV titers were similar. Colonies with added propolis were also significantly stronger than propolis-removed colonies. These findings indicate that propolis may interfere with the dynamics of V. destructor-transmitted viruses, thereby further emphasizing the importance of propolis for honeybee health.

AB - Social immunity is a key factor for honeybee health, including behavioral defense strategies such as the collective use of antimicrobial plant resins (propolis). While laboratory data repeatedly show significant propolis effects, field data are scarce, especially at the colony level. Here, we investigated whether propolis, as naturally deposited in the nests, can protect honeybees against ectoparasitic mites Varroa destructor and associated viruses, which are currently considered the most serious biological threat to European honeybee subspecies, Apis mellifera, globally. Propolis intake of 10 field colonies was manipulated by either reducing or adding freshly collected propolis. Mite infestations, titers of deformed wing virus (DWV) and sacbrood virus (SBV), resin intake, as well as colony strength were recorded monthly from July to September 2013. We additionally examined the effect of raw propolis volatiles on mite survival in laboratory assays. Our results showed no significant effects of adding or removing propolis on mite survival and infestation levels. However, in relation to V. destructor, DWV titers increased significantly less in colonies with added propolis than in propolis-removed colonies, whereas SBV titers were similar. Colonies with added propolis were also significantly stronger than propolis-removed colonies. These findings indicate that propolis may interfere with the dynamics of V. destructor-transmitted viruses, thereby further emphasizing the importance of propolis for honeybee health.

KW - Apis mellifera

KW - Deformed wing virus

KW - Plant-insect interactions

KW - Resin

KW - Sacbrood virus

KW - Social immunity

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012971921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/insects8010015

DO - 10.3390/insects8010015

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 28178181

AN - SCOPUS:85012971921

VL - 8

JO - Insects

JF - Insects

SN - 2075-4450

IS - 1

M1 - 15

ER -

Documents

DOI