‘I can show you; here’s the video’–video-supported student-led debates in game-based approaches

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

‘I can show you; here’s the video’–video-supported student-led debates in game-based approaches. / Diekhoff, Henrike.
In: Cogent Education, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2398842, 2024.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ab6afca56bfe4cf88147c083ec1ecc15,
title = "{\textquoteleft}I can show you; here{\textquoteright}s the video{\textquoteright}–video-supported student-led debates in game-based approaches",
abstract = "The utilization of devices like iPads for video feedback has become increasingly popular and is now acknowledged as a valuable asset in PE. Nevertheless, existing research and implementation of video feedback have been primarily concentrating on particular skills. This study explores students{\textquoteright} perceptions of video-supported debates in game-based approaches. For this purpose, a football unit was taught using the instructional approach of Teaching Games for Understanding. Students were presented with football in the context of three-versus-three games and one child on each team tagged game situations with an app. The research approach involved qualitative methods, specifically using grounded theory methodology (Corbin & Strauss, 2008), to analyse semi-structured interviews conducted with students. Based on the interview analysis, the phenomena that students experienced in visualised student-led debates were classified as: 1) beneficial video analysis (with the subcategories of visible assessment of game performance and facilitating images for the discussion of (certain) game situations), and 2) collaboratively developed game plans (with the subcategories of strategic tactical considerations and efficient technical hints). The outcomes of the study reveal beneficial impacts on student conversations and interactions. The findings suggest that collectively watching videos can have a positive impact on debates of ideas, even at the primary school level.",
keywords = "debates of ideas, Education, grounded theory, Physical Education, primary school, Primary/Elementary Education, Technology, TGFU, Video tagging, Educational science",
author = "Henrike Diekhoff",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1080/2331186X.2024.2398842",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Cogent Education",
issn = "2331-186X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘I can show you; here’s the video’–video-supported student-led debates in game-based approaches

AU - Diekhoff, Henrike

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - The utilization of devices like iPads for video feedback has become increasingly popular and is now acknowledged as a valuable asset in PE. Nevertheless, existing research and implementation of video feedback have been primarily concentrating on particular skills. This study explores students’ perceptions of video-supported debates in game-based approaches. For this purpose, a football unit was taught using the instructional approach of Teaching Games for Understanding. Students were presented with football in the context of three-versus-three games and one child on each team tagged game situations with an app. The research approach involved qualitative methods, specifically using grounded theory methodology (Corbin & Strauss, 2008), to analyse semi-structured interviews conducted with students. Based on the interview analysis, the phenomena that students experienced in visualised student-led debates were classified as: 1) beneficial video analysis (with the subcategories of visible assessment of game performance and facilitating images for the discussion of (certain) game situations), and 2) collaboratively developed game plans (with the subcategories of strategic tactical considerations and efficient technical hints). The outcomes of the study reveal beneficial impacts on student conversations and interactions. The findings suggest that collectively watching videos can have a positive impact on debates of ideas, even at the primary school level.

AB - The utilization of devices like iPads for video feedback has become increasingly popular and is now acknowledged as a valuable asset in PE. Nevertheless, existing research and implementation of video feedback have been primarily concentrating on particular skills. This study explores students’ perceptions of video-supported debates in game-based approaches. For this purpose, a football unit was taught using the instructional approach of Teaching Games for Understanding. Students were presented with football in the context of three-versus-three games and one child on each team tagged game situations with an app. The research approach involved qualitative methods, specifically using grounded theory methodology (Corbin & Strauss, 2008), to analyse semi-structured interviews conducted with students. Based on the interview analysis, the phenomena that students experienced in visualised student-led debates were classified as: 1) beneficial video analysis (with the subcategories of visible assessment of game performance and facilitating images for the discussion of (certain) game situations), and 2) collaboratively developed game plans (with the subcategories of strategic tactical considerations and efficient technical hints). The outcomes of the study reveal beneficial impacts on student conversations and interactions. The findings suggest that collectively watching videos can have a positive impact on debates of ideas, even at the primary school level.

KW - debates of ideas

KW - Education

KW - grounded theory

KW - Physical Education

KW - primary school

KW - Primary/Elementary Education

KW - Technology

KW - TGFU

KW - Video tagging

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203604195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2398842

DO - 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2398842

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85203604195

VL - 11

JO - Cogent Education

JF - Cogent Education

SN - 2331-186X

IS - 1

M1 - 2398842

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Decentralized utilization of wasted organic material in urban areas
  2. Ready for new business models?
  3. Language, Literature and the Environment
  4. Accounting for Information Infrastructure as Medium for Organisational Change
  5. An empirical survey on biobanking of human genetic material and data in six EU countries
  6. Theodor Fontane, das Fremde und die Juden
  7. Readings in applied organizational behavior from the Lüneburg Symposium
  8. What Do They Reflect on?—A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Physical Education Preservice Teachers’ Written Reflections After a Long-Term Internship
  9. Guest editorial
  10. Transdisziplinäre Nähe oder soziologische Distanz?
  11. Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains
  12. "Sustainable University"
  13. The COVID-19 pandemic as an disruptive event in school health promotion. Survey results from Germany
  14. Uncovering Divergence
  15. Democratic capitalism vs. binary economics
  16. Spatial variation in human disturbances and their effects on forest structure and biodiversity across an Afromontane forest
  17. Future-Proofing Fuel Cells
  18. Provocative Alloys
  19. Log in and breathe out: efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an online sleep training for teachers affected by work-related strain
  20. Workshop: 20 years health promotion research in and on settings
  21. Comment on "nomenclature, Chemical Abstracts Service Numbers, Isomer Enumeration, Ring Strain, and Stereochemistry
  22. Monitoring mental stressors at work with the work health audit instrument factors
  23. Was tun, Herr Luhmann?
  24. Volunteering in retirement motivation and design of use of Senior Expert Services
  25. Magnús eiríksson
  26. A Longitudinal Study of Great Ape Cognition