How interest groups adapt to the changing forest governance landscape in the EU: A case study from Germany

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

How interest groups adapt to the changing forest governance landscape in the EU: A case study from Germany. / Jürges, Nataly; Newig, Jens.
In: Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 50, 01.01.2015, p. 228-235.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a3cf5027019e4195a70259da3a354815,
title = "How interest groups adapt to the changing forest governance landscape in the EU: A case study from Germany",
abstract = "Multi-level governance theory states that interest groups play an important role in decision-making processes. However, the implications of the assumed trend from government to multi-level forest governance for interest groups have not been sufficiently examined. This paper examines the case of German forest politics and studies the effects of the trend towards multi-level governance for forest-related interest groups. The empirical analysis implies that interest groups are in an organizational and/or strategic reconfiguration process in response to changes of the overall governance structure. Different coping strategies among interest groups organized on multiple levels, and interest groups organized on a single organizational level are observed. Many interest groups feel overwhelmed in their attempt to understand and observe every level of action at the same time. Inequalities between the ability of different interest groups to influence decision-making might be reinforced by the trend towards a multi-level governance structure.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, Environmental groups, Lobbying, Non-governmental organization, Participation",
author = "Nataly J{\"u}rges and Jens Newig",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.015",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "228--235",
journal = "Forest Policy and Economics",
issn = "1389-9341",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How interest groups adapt to the changing forest governance landscape in the EU

T2 - A case study from Germany

AU - Jürges, Nataly

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Multi-level governance theory states that interest groups play an important role in decision-making processes. However, the implications of the assumed trend from government to multi-level forest governance for interest groups have not been sufficiently examined. This paper examines the case of German forest politics and studies the effects of the trend towards multi-level governance for forest-related interest groups. The empirical analysis implies that interest groups are in an organizational and/or strategic reconfiguration process in response to changes of the overall governance structure. Different coping strategies among interest groups organized on multiple levels, and interest groups organized on a single organizational level are observed. Many interest groups feel overwhelmed in their attempt to understand and observe every level of action at the same time. Inequalities between the ability of different interest groups to influence decision-making might be reinforced by the trend towards a multi-level governance structure.

AB - Multi-level governance theory states that interest groups play an important role in decision-making processes. However, the implications of the assumed trend from government to multi-level forest governance for interest groups have not been sufficiently examined. This paper examines the case of German forest politics and studies the effects of the trend towards multi-level governance for forest-related interest groups. The empirical analysis implies that interest groups are in an organizational and/or strategic reconfiguration process in response to changes of the overall governance structure. Different coping strategies among interest groups organized on multiple levels, and interest groups organized on a single organizational level are observed. Many interest groups feel overwhelmed in their attempt to understand and observe every level of action at the same time. Inequalities between the ability of different interest groups to influence decision-making might be reinforced by the trend towards a multi-level governance structure.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - Environmental groups

KW - Lobbying

KW - Non-governmental organization

KW - Participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027944854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.015

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 50

SP - 228

EP - 235

JO - Forest Policy and Economics

JF - Forest Policy and Economics

SN - 1389-9341

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Andy Brogan

Publications

  1. Global Theories of Regionalism
  2. A multi-level assessment of changes in stakeholder constellations, interest and influence on ecosystem services under different landscape scenarios in southwestern Ethiopia
  3. Symbolic Environmental Legislation and Societal Self-Deception
  4. Ambiguity effects of rhyme and meter
  5. Supplementing Q-method with narratives
  6. Effect of an internet- and app-based stress intervention compared to online psychoeducation in university students with depressive symptoms
  7. Recognition of a WCAM Settlement in Germany
  8. Propaganda auf hoher See
  9. Process window and mechanical properties for thin magnesium- and zinc-wires in dieless wire drawing
  10. Voleur au defile de mode
  11. The Principles of Public International Law and their Influence on Space Contracts
  12. Evaluation und Evaluationsforschung
  13. Evidence for climatic changes around the Matuyama-Brunhes Boundary (MBB) inferred from a multi-proxy palaeoenvironmental study of the GBY#2 core, Jordan River Valley, Israel
  14. Sozialarbeit: unbegriffene Theorie - begriffslose Praxis?
  15. Pathways for Germany’s low-carbon energy transformation towards 2050
  16. Implementing Education for Sustainable Development in teacher education
  17. Science education meets inclusion
  18. A greener path for the EU Common Agricultural Policy
  19. Developing key competencies in sustainability through project-based learning in graduate sustainability programs
  20. Energy Transition in Germany
  21. Shitstorm-Prävention
  22. The Alternative World of Michel Houellebecq
  23. Pesticide and Greenhouse Gas Externalities from US Agriculture
  24. Vorwort
  25. Die Strategie Integratives Gendering in Lehre, Forschung und Hochschulstrukturen
  26. The Democratic Capacity of Science Education or: Is Inclusive Science Education the Contemporary Science education?
  27. Préparation à la transition de l’école obligatoire à la formation professionnelle
  28. Expertise(n)