How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands. / de Vente, Joris; Reed, Mark S.; Stringer, Lindsay C. et al.
In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 21, No. 2, 24, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{99df808068124e36ba0d849328ae75d3,
title = "How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands",
abstract = "Although the design of participatory processes to manage social-ecological systems needs to be adapted to local contexts, it is unclear which elements of process design might be universal. We use empirical evidence to analyze the extent to which context and process design can enable or impede stakeholder participation and facilitate beneficial environmental and social outcomes. To explore the role of design and minor variations in local context on the outcomes of participatory processes, we interviewed participants and facilitators from 11 case studies in which different process designs were used to select sustainable land management options in Spain and Portugal. We analyzed interview data using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Results showed that although some aspects of local context affected process outcomes, factors associated with process design were more significant. Processes leading to more beneficial environmental and social outcomes included the following: the legitimate representation of stakeholders; professional facilitation including structured methods for aggregating information and balancing power dynamics among participants; and provision of information and decision-making power to all participants. Although processes initiated or facilitated by government bodies led to significantly less trust, information gain, and learning, decisions in these processes were more likely to be accepted and implemented. To further test the role of context in determining the outcomes of participation, we interviewed facilitators from a process that was replicated across 13 dryland study sites around the world, reflecting much greater national variations in context. The similarity of outcomes across these sites suggested that the socio-cultural context in which the process was replicated had little impact on its outcomes, as long as certain design principles were fulfilled. Overall, our findings provide a solid empirical basis for good practice in the design of participatory processes in the management of social-ecological systems. ",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Drylands, environmental management, land degradation, social learning, stakeholder engagement, sustainable land management",
author = "{de Vente}, Joris and Reed, {Mark S.} and Stringer, {Lindsay C.} and Sandra Valente and Jens Newig",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 by the author(s).",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5751/ES-08053-210224",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands

AU - de Vente, Joris

AU - Reed, Mark S.

AU - Stringer, Lindsay C.

AU - Valente, Sandra

AU - Newig, Jens

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 by the author(s).

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Although the design of participatory processes to manage social-ecological systems needs to be adapted to local contexts, it is unclear which elements of process design might be universal. We use empirical evidence to analyze the extent to which context and process design can enable or impede stakeholder participation and facilitate beneficial environmental and social outcomes. To explore the role of design and minor variations in local context on the outcomes of participatory processes, we interviewed participants and facilitators from 11 case studies in which different process designs were used to select sustainable land management options in Spain and Portugal. We analyzed interview data using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Results showed that although some aspects of local context affected process outcomes, factors associated with process design were more significant. Processes leading to more beneficial environmental and social outcomes included the following: the legitimate representation of stakeholders; professional facilitation including structured methods for aggregating information and balancing power dynamics among participants; and provision of information and decision-making power to all participants. Although processes initiated or facilitated by government bodies led to significantly less trust, information gain, and learning, decisions in these processes were more likely to be accepted and implemented. To further test the role of context in determining the outcomes of participation, we interviewed facilitators from a process that was replicated across 13 dryland study sites around the world, reflecting much greater national variations in context. The similarity of outcomes across these sites suggested that the socio-cultural context in which the process was replicated had little impact on its outcomes, as long as certain design principles were fulfilled. Overall, our findings provide a solid empirical basis for good practice in the design of participatory processes in the management of social-ecological systems.

AB - Although the design of participatory processes to manage social-ecological systems needs to be adapted to local contexts, it is unclear which elements of process design might be universal. We use empirical evidence to analyze the extent to which context and process design can enable or impede stakeholder participation and facilitate beneficial environmental and social outcomes. To explore the role of design and minor variations in local context on the outcomes of participatory processes, we interviewed participants and facilitators from 11 case studies in which different process designs were used to select sustainable land management options in Spain and Portugal. We analyzed interview data using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Results showed that although some aspects of local context affected process outcomes, factors associated with process design were more significant. Processes leading to more beneficial environmental and social outcomes included the following: the legitimate representation of stakeholders; professional facilitation including structured methods for aggregating information and balancing power dynamics among participants; and provision of information and decision-making power to all participants. Although processes initiated or facilitated by government bodies led to significantly less trust, information gain, and learning, decisions in these processes were more likely to be accepted and implemented. To further test the role of context in determining the outcomes of participation, we interviewed facilitators from a process that was replicated across 13 dryland study sites around the world, reflecting much greater national variations in context. The similarity of outcomes across these sites suggested that the socio-cultural context in which the process was replicated had little impact on its outcomes, as long as certain design principles were fulfilled. Overall, our findings provide a solid empirical basis for good practice in the design of participatory processes in the management of social-ecological systems.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Drylands

KW - environmental management

KW - land degradation

KW - social learning

KW - stakeholder engagement

KW - sustainable land management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976569600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-08053-210224

DO - 10.5751/ES-08053-210224

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 21

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 2

M1 - 24

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Anja Achenbach

Publications

  1. Enquiry-based Science Education in Austrian Teacher Professional Development Courses
  2. Feedback
  3. Sustainability Reporting at Schools
  4. Molecular analyses and species distribution models indicate cryptic northern mountain refugia for a forestdwelling ground beetle
  5. The Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment (AReA)
  6. Corrigendum to: Pathways to Implementation: Evidence on How Participation in Environmental Governance Impacts on Environmental Outcomes
  7. Regulating Vessel Discharges on the International and EU Level
  8. Do employers have more monopsony power in slack labor markets?
  9. It pays to be active on many foreign markets
  10. Heat and light
  11. Introducing ‘cultures of rejection’
  12. Is Environmental Manage­ment Accounting a Discipline?
  13. Liebe
  14. Personality in personnel selection and assessment
  15. Vulnerablility of Ecosystem Services in Farmland Depends on Landscape Management
  16. Quo vadis Berufsvorbereitung ?
  17. BAKIP - Universität und Praxis im Dialog
  18. Dynamic tensile properties and microstructural evolution of extruded EW75 magnesium alloy at high strain rates
  19. Die neue Parallelgesellschaft
  20. Agentic and communal interaction goals in conflictual intergroup relations
  21. Elternarbeit in der Krippe
  22. Assessment of Degradation of 18 Antibiotics in the Closed Bottle Test
  23. Ecosystem services between sustainability and efficiency
  24. A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing
  25. Health promoting schools in germany. Mapping the implementation of holistic strategies to tackle ncds and promote health
  26. We´ve Been Here Before
  27. Are Si-C bonds cleaved by microorganisms?
  28. The 6-month effectiveness of Internet-based guided self-help for depression in adults with Type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus
  29. The Gallerists
  30. Feedback on creative ideas