Evaluation of an organizational health intervention for low-skilled workers and immigrants
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Human Relations , Vol. 70, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 994-1016.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of an organizational health intervention for low-skilled workers and immigrants
AU - Busch, Christine
AU - Koch, Tobias
AU - Clasen, Julia
AU - Winkler, Eva
AU - Vowinkel, Julia
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - We conducted this realist evaluation study of an organizational health intervention involving 421 low-skilled workers (50% female), half of whom were immigrants, in three companies over six months. Non-profit agencies implemented peer-mentoring and taught peer-mentors and line managers how to enhance social support in order to improve workers’ work situation in a participative way. We formulated five mechanisms of change: the company management encouragement mechanism, the role model mechanism, the peer-mentor support mechanism, the line manager support mechanism, and the participative work improvement mechanism. We combined realist evaluation with a quasi-experimental design and process evaluation in a multi-methods approach. Results of multiple group latent change models and qualitative research showed that intervention-group workers perceived increases in peer-mentor support but not in line manager support. Peer-mentors managed to initiate high-quality improvements at work. Intervention-group workers showed significant reductions in blood pressure. Control-group workers experienced more psychosomatic complaints over time in significant contrast to intervention-group workers. Our results suggest that peer-mentoring offers an effective way for low-skilled workers and immigrants to achieve better health. To improve such health effects, a greater focus on line managers’ work situations is needed to help them provide support.
AB - We conducted this realist evaluation study of an organizational health intervention involving 421 low-skilled workers (50% female), half of whom were immigrants, in three companies over six months. Non-profit agencies implemented peer-mentoring and taught peer-mentors and line managers how to enhance social support in order to improve workers’ work situation in a participative way. We formulated five mechanisms of change: the company management encouragement mechanism, the role model mechanism, the peer-mentor support mechanism, the line manager support mechanism, and the participative work improvement mechanism. We combined realist evaluation with a quasi-experimental design and process evaluation in a multi-methods approach. Results of multiple group latent change models and qualitative research showed that intervention-group workers perceived increases in peer-mentor support but not in line manager support. Peer-mentors managed to initiate high-quality improvements at work. Intervention-group workers showed significant reductions in blood pressure. Control-group workers experienced more psychosomatic complaints over time in significant contrast to intervention-group workers. Our results suggest that peer-mentoring offers an effective way for low-skilled workers and immigrants to achieve better health. To improve such health effects, a greater focus on line managers’ work situations is needed to help them provide support.
KW - job stress intervention
KW - line manager training
KW - low-skilled workers
KW - multi-methods approach
KW - occupational health intervention
KW - organizational health intervention
KW - peer-mentoring
KW - realist evaluation
KW - social support
KW - Social Work and Social Pedagogics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021944708&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0018726716682308
DO - 10.1177/0018726716682308
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85021944708
VL - 70
SP - 994
EP - 1016
JO - Human Relations
JF - Human Relations
SN - 0018-7267
IS - 8
ER -