Evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products within the European Union

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products within the European Union. / Meynecke, J. O.
In: Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, Vol. 78, No. 3, 12.2004, p. 157-160.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{df725b03f90b47eeb809d133289a2296,
title = "Evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products within the European Union",
abstract = "Plant protection products have to be evaluated and authorised in the EU-Member States since 1993 in accordance with Council Directive 91/414/EEC. This Directive formed the framework for a European-wide harmonised regulatory system for the evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products and the active substances in them. A two-stage registration process has been established through the Directive, with the consideration of the acceptability of active substances being done at community level while the authorisation of specific products and uses is dealt with by the individual Member States. Thus, Annex I to the Directive, the list of active substances deemed acceptable and which may be included in pesticide products for use in the community, is the prime focus of the European regulatory system. The programme for evaluating all of the existing active substances (which were on the market before July 1993) involves several steps and stages, stretching over a period of 15 years. It was formerly co-ordinated by the European Commission and now by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), with the assistance of the ECCO-Team (European Community Co-ordination) since 1996 and since 2003 by the EPCO-Team (EFSA Peer Review Coordination). The Team provides technical and administrative support to the programme for the evaluation of active substances on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority, and is responsible for the peer review programme in particular.",
keywords = "Chemistry",
author = "Meynecke, {J. O.}",
year = "2004",
month = dec,
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "157--160",
journal = "Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality",
issn = "1613-9216",
publisher = "Julius Kuhn-Institut Federal Research Center for Cultivated Plants",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products within the European Union

AU - Meynecke, J. O.

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - Plant protection products have to be evaluated and authorised in the EU-Member States since 1993 in accordance with Council Directive 91/414/EEC. This Directive formed the framework for a European-wide harmonised regulatory system for the evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products and the active substances in them. A two-stage registration process has been established through the Directive, with the consideration of the acceptability of active substances being done at community level while the authorisation of specific products and uses is dealt with by the individual Member States. Thus, Annex I to the Directive, the list of active substances deemed acceptable and which may be included in pesticide products for use in the community, is the prime focus of the European regulatory system. The programme for evaluating all of the existing active substances (which were on the market before July 1993) involves several steps and stages, stretching over a period of 15 years. It was formerly co-ordinated by the European Commission and now by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), with the assistance of the ECCO-Team (European Community Co-ordination) since 1996 and since 2003 by the EPCO-Team (EFSA Peer Review Coordination). The Team provides technical and administrative support to the programme for the evaluation of active substances on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority, and is responsible for the peer review programme in particular.

AB - Plant protection products have to be evaluated and authorised in the EU-Member States since 1993 in accordance with Council Directive 91/414/EEC. This Directive formed the framework for a European-wide harmonised regulatory system for the evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products and the active substances in them. A two-stage registration process has been established through the Directive, with the consideration of the acceptability of active substances being done at community level while the authorisation of specific products and uses is dealt with by the individual Member States. Thus, Annex I to the Directive, the list of active substances deemed acceptable and which may be included in pesticide products for use in the community, is the prime focus of the European regulatory system. The programme for evaluating all of the existing active substances (which were on the market before July 1993) involves several steps and stages, stretching over a period of 15 years. It was formerly co-ordinated by the European Commission and now by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), with the assistance of the ECCO-Team (European Community Co-ordination) since 1996 and since 2003 by the EPCO-Team (EFSA Peer Review Coordination). The Team provides technical and administrative support to the programme for the evaluation of active substances on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority, and is responsible for the peer review programme in particular.

KW - Chemistry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11144347563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:11144347563

VL - 78

SP - 157

EP - 160

JO - Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality

JF - Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality

SN - 1613-9216

IS - 3

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Organisation im soziotechnischen Gemenge
  2. Die Miniphänomenta
  3. Das Thema Flucht im Unterricht im digitalen Zeitalter - Welche Strategien nutzen Studierende, um 'alternatives' Unterrichtsmaterial zu evaluieren?
  4. Predictors of well-being, future anxiety, and multiple recurrent health complaints among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic
  5. Selbstberichtete Strategienutzung und mathematische Modellierungskompetenz
  6. Theoretische Rahmungen von (Gewalt-) Situationen
  7. Die Wissenschaftsinitiative „Management und unternehmerisches Handeln"
  8. Herausforderungen in der Grundschule digital begegnen
  9. Die Zufriedenheit liegt im Detail - oder
  10. G. Evelyn Hutchinson and the Invention of Modern Ecology
  11. Mosaic landscapes provide conservation pockets for an endangered species
  12. Teachers’ beliefs concerning teaching multilingual learners
  13. PROPERTY / EIGENTUM: Thematic Issue of "Texte zur Kunst", Nr. 117
  14. Do sustainability projects stimulate organizational learning in universities?
  15. Migration als Ausnahme?
  16. ‘Heroes aren’t always so great!’–Heroic perceptions under mortality salience
  17. Rule of Law
  18. Analysing the potential for sustainable e-mobility - The case of Germany
  19. Prima B1
  20. Pharmaceuticals in the Environment
  21. Einleitung: Grundlagentexte zur Journalistik
  22. Frauen in Unternehmensberatungen
  23. Chinesische Expansion in das Südliche Afrika
  24. Kooperative Entwicklungsberatung zur Stärkung der Selbststeuerung (= KESS) in der Lehrerbildung
  25. Waste prevention behaviour and fast and frugal heuristics
  26. Vorwort von Stefan Schaltegger
  27. Potenziale eines nachhaltigen Unterrichts und einer nachhaltigen Schulentwicklung durch ein netzwerkgestütztes kooperatives Selbstlernen Berufsbildender Schulen
  28. Multisensory Design of Retail Environments
  29. Kompetenzentwicklung von Lehramtsstudierenden sichtbar machen
  30. Formazione religiosa
  31. Balanced Scorecard
  32. Organizational Downsizing