Digital leadership routines: Understanding the role of artifacts in digital leadership development

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Digital leadership routines: Understanding the role of artifacts in digital leadership development. / Eberl, Julia Katharina; Zimmer, Markus Philipp; Drews, Paul.
In: Information and Organization, Vol. 35, No. 4, 100599, 12.2025.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{728c70e74f594da28fd80884208ef520,
title = "Digital leadership routines: Understanding the role of artifacts in digital leadership development",
abstract = "Digitalization requires organizations to quickly adapt to technological trends for sustaining and improving their market position. To ensure they are capable of responding quickly to such trends, organizations implement a new leadership approach, which research and practice refer to as Digital Leadership (DL). The previous literature considers organizations from the information technology (IT) industry as frontrunners in developing DL. While it has focused on the skills of the digital leader and defining DL, our study addresses the so far unexplored development of DL at routine level. We conducted 24 interviews with followers and leaders in the IT industry. Analyzing the transcripts of those interviews with the theoretical lens of organizational routines, we contribute to DL research. We shift the narrative in this field from defining what DL is to understanding how DL is developed by the actions of leaders and followers through artifact-based transformation of DL routines. We identify artifacts in six roles that stabilize or flexibilize performance of DL routines. We uncover that DL is not static but dynamic as flexibilizing artifacts promote adjustment in routine performance based on situational context. Leaders and followers can impede DL development by deciding to situationally deviate from the intended role of artifacts due to tensions between artifacts and past experiences. These findings advance DL theory by uncovering the importance of followers in DL and leadership theory by adding the lens of routines to leadership development. They help practitioners to understand the complexity of DL development and how the IT industry realizes DL.",
keywords = "Digital leadership, Digitalization, IT industry, Leadership 4.0, Leadership development, Organizational routines, Business informatics",
author = "Eberl, {Julia Katharina} and Zimmer, {Markus Philipp} and Paul Drews",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Authors",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100599",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
journal = "Information and Organization",
issn = "1471-7727",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital leadership routines

T2 - Understanding the role of artifacts in digital leadership development

AU - Eberl, Julia Katharina

AU - Zimmer, Markus Philipp

AU - Drews, Paul

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Digitalization requires organizations to quickly adapt to technological trends for sustaining and improving their market position. To ensure they are capable of responding quickly to such trends, organizations implement a new leadership approach, which research and practice refer to as Digital Leadership (DL). The previous literature considers organizations from the information technology (IT) industry as frontrunners in developing DL. While it has focused on the skills of the digital leader and defining DL, our study addresses the so far unexplored development of DL at routine level. We conducted 24 interviews with followers and leaders in the IT industry. Analyzing the transcripts of those interviews with the theoretical lens of organizational routines, we contribute to DL research. We shift the narrative in this field from defining what DL is to understanding how DL is developed by the actions of leaders and followers through artifact-based transformation of DL routines. We identify artifacts in six roles that stabilize or flexibilize performance of DL routines. We uncover that DL is not static but dynamic as flexibilizing artifacts promote adjustment in routine performance based on situational context. Leaders and followers can impede DL development by deciding to situationally deviate from the intended role of artifacts due to tensions between artifacts and past experiences. These findings advance DL theory by uncovering the importance of followers in DL and leadership theory by adding the lens of routines to leadership development. They help practitioners to understand the complexity of DL development and how the IT industry realizes DL.

AB - Digitalization requires organizations to quickly adapt to technological trends for sustaining and improving their market position. To ensure they are capable of responding quickly to such trends, organizations implement a new leadership approach, which research and practice refer to as Digital Leadership (DL). The previous literature considers organizations from the information technology (IT) industry as frontrunners in developing DL. While it has focused on the skills of the digital leader and defining DL, our study addresses the so far unexplored development of DL at routine level. We conducted 24 interviews with followers and leaders in the IT industry. Analyzing the transcripts of those interviews with the theoretical lens of organizational routines, we contribute to DL research. We shift the narrative in this field from defining what DL is to understanding how DL is developed by the actions of leaders and followers through artifact-based transformation of DL routines. We identify artifacts in six roles that stabilize or flexibilize performance of DL routines. We uncover that DL is not static but dynamic as flexibilizing artifacts promote adjustment in routine performance based on situational context. Leaders and followers can impede DL development by deciding to situationally deviate from the intended role of artifacts due to tensions between artifacts and past experiences. These findings advance DL theory by uncovering the importance of followers in DL and leadership theory by adding the lens of routines to leadership development. They help practitioners to understand the complexity of DL development and how the IT industry realizes DL.

KW - Digital leadership

KW - Digitalization

KW - IT industry

KW - Leadership 4.0

KW - Leadership development

KW - Organizational routines

KW - Business informatics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105014813578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100599

DO - 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100599

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 35

JO - Information and Organization

JF - Information and Organization

SN - 1471-7727

IS - 4

M1 - 100599

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Michael Braungart