Corruption and Social Values: Do Postmaterialists Justify Bribery?

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

Corruption and Social Values: Do Postmaterialists Justify Bribery? / Kravtsova, Maria; Oshchepkov, Aleksey; Welzel, Christian.
Moskau: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2014. (National Research University Higher School of Economics Research Paper Series; No. WP BRP 34/SOC/2014).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

Kravtsova, M, Oshchepkov, A & Welzel, C 2014 'Corruption and Social Values: Do Postmaterialists Justify Bribery?' National Research University Higher School of Economics Research Paper Series, no. WP BRP 34/SOC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moskau. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384030

APA

Kravtsova, M., Oshchepkov, A., & Welzel, C. (2014). Corruption and Social Values: Do Postmaterialists Justify Bribery? (National Research University Higher School of Economics Research Paper Series; No. WP BRP 34/SOC/2014). National Research University Higher School of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384030

Vancouver

Kravtsova M, Oshchepkov A, Welzel C. Corruption and Social Values: Do Postmaterialists Justify Bribery? Moskau: National Research University Higher School of Economics. 2014. (National Research University Higher School of Economics Research Paper Series; WP BRP 34/SOC/2014). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2384030

Bibtex

@techreport{02970cdf754e43ddb6ec74bd46a6a1fe,
title = "Corruption and Social Values: Do Postmaterialists Justify Bribery?",
abstract = "Using World Values Survey data from dozens of countries around the world, this article analyzes the relationship between postmaterialist values and attitudes towards bribery in a multi-level framework. This is an inherently interesting and under-researched topic because the various propensities attributed to postmaterialism lead to conflicting expectations about how these values affect attitudes towards bribery. On one hand, the alleged tendency of postmaterialists towards impartiality should lead them to condemn bribery. On the other hand, condemning bribery is a social desirability issue and postmaterialists are known to be less susceptible to desirability pressures and more relaxed about norm deviations. From this point of view, postmaterialists might be more tolerant toward bribery. Reflecting these conflicting expectations, we obtain an ambivalent result, evident in an inverted U-shaped relationship: as we move from pure materialism to mixed positions, people tend to justify bribery more, but then moving from mixed positions to pure postmaterialism, people become again more dismissive of bribery. What is more, the demographic prevalence of postmaterialists in a country moderates these values{\textquoteright} effect on bribery: where postmaterialists are more prevalent, the disapproving effect on bribery outweighs the approving effect. This finding contributes to a better understanding of the pronounced negative correlation between corruption and postmaterialism at the country level and has some important implications.",
keywords = "Politics, Politische Kulturforschung, Demokratieforschung, Gender and Diversity",
author = "Maria Kravtsova and Aleksey Oshchepkov and Christian Welzel",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.2384030",
language = "English",
series = "National Research University Higher School of Economics Research Paper Series",
publisher = "National Research University Higher School of Economics",
number = "WP BRP 34/SOC/2014",
address = "Russian Federation",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "National Research University Higher School of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Corruption and Social Values

T2 - Do Postmaterialists Justify Bribery?

AU - Kravtsova, Maria

AU - Oshchepkov, Aleksey

AU - Welzel, Christian

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Using World Values Survey data from dozens of countries around the world, this article analyzes the relationship between postmaterialist values and attitudes towards bribery in a multi-level framework. This is an inherently interesting and under-researched topic because the various propensities attributed to postmaterialism lead to conflicting expectations about how these values affect attitudes towards bribery. On one hand, the alleged tendency of postmaterialists towards impartiality should lead them to condemn bribery. On the other hand, condemning bribery is a social desirability issue and postmaterialists are known to be less susceptible to desirability pressures and more relaxed about norm deviations. From this point of view, postmaterialists might be more tolerant toward bribery. Reflecting these conflicting expectations, we obtain an ambivalent result, evident in an inverted U-shaped relationship: as we move from pure materialism to mixed positions, people tend to justify bribery more, but then moving from mixed positions to pure postmaterialism, people become again more dismissive of bribery. What is more, the demographic prevalence of postmaterialists in a country moderates these values’ effect on bribery: where postmaterialists are more prevalent, the disapproving effect on bribery outweighs the approving effect. This finding contributes to a better understanding of the pronounced negative correlation between corruption and postmaterialism at the country level and has some important implications.

AB - Using World Values Survey data from dozens of countries around the world, this article analyzes the relationship between postmaterialist values and attitudes towards bribery in a multi-level framework. This is an inherently interesting and under-researched topic because the various propensities attributed to postmaterialism lead to conflicting expectations about how these values affect attitudes towards bribery. On one hand, the alleged tendency of postmaterialists towards impartiality should lead them to condemn bribery. On the other hand, condemning bribery is a social desirability issue and postmaterialists are known to be less susceptible to desirability pressures and more relaxed about norm deviations. From this point of view, postmaterialists might be more tolerant toward bribery. Reflecting these conflicting expectations, we obtain an ambivalent result, evident in an inverted U-shaped relationship: as we move from pure materialism to mixed positions, people tend to justify bribery more, but then moving from mixed positions to pure postmaterialism, people become again more dismissive of bribery. What is more, the demographic prevalence of postmaterialists in a country moderates these values’ effect on bribery: where postmaterialists are more prevalent, the disapproving effect on bribery outweighs the approving effect. This finding contributes to a better understanding of the pronounced negative correlation between corruption and postmaterialism at the country level and has some important implications.

KW - Politics

KW - Politische Kulturforschung

KW - Demokratieforschung

KW - Gender and Diversity

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/366c3af6-b349-342b-98d0-79291b0310a5/

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.2384030

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.2384030

M3 - Working papers

T3 - National Research University Higher School of Economics Research Paper Series

BT - Corruption and Social Values

PB - National Research University Higher School of Economics

CY - Moskau

ER -