Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Circular value creation architectures : Make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire. / Hansen, Erik G.; Revellio, Ferdinand.

In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 24, No. 6, 12.2020, p. 1250-1273.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1ae719d8327d4e968f62b1268404c344,
title = "Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire",
abstract = "Slowing and closing product and related material loops in a circular economy (CE) requires circular service operations such as take-back, repair, and recycling. However, it remains open whether these are coordinated by OEMs, retailers, or third-party loop operators (e.g., refurbishers). Literature rooted in the classic make-or-buy concept proposes four generic coordination mechanisms and related value creation architectures: vertical integration, network, outsourcing, or doing nothing (laissez-faire). For each of these existing architectures, we conducted an embedded case study in the domain of smartphones with the aim to better understand how central coordinators align with actors in the value chain to offer voluntary circular service operations. Based on the above coordination mechanisms, our central contribution is the development of a typology of circular value creation architectures (CVCAs) and its elaboration regarding circular coordination, loop configuration, and ambition levels. We find that firms following slowing strategies (i.e., repair, reuse, and remanufacturing) pursue higher degrees of vertical integration than those following closing strategies (i.e., recycling) because of the specificity of the assets involved and their greater strategic relevance. The typology also shows that higher degrees of vertical integration enable higher degrees of loop closure (i.e., from open to closed loops) and better feedbacks into product design. Furthermore, we differentiate the understanding on third-party actors by distinguishing between independent and autonomous loop operators. Overall, we strengthen the actor perspective in product circularity literature by clarifying the actor set, their interrelationships, and how they form value creation architectures.",
keywords = "business model innovation, circular economy, consumer electronics, corporate sustainability, partnerships, product design, business model innovation, Circular economy, consumer electronics, corporate sustainability, parnterships, product design, Sustainability Science",
author = "Hansen, {Erik G.} and Ferdinand Revellio",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Journal of Industrial Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Yale University",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1111/jiec.13016",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1250--1273",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Ecology",
issn = "1088-1980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Circular value creation architectures

T2 - Make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire

AU - Hansen, Erik G.

AU - Revellio, Ferdinand

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Industrial Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Yale University

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - Slowing and closing product and related material loops in a circular economy (CE) requires circular service operations such as take-back, repair, and recycling. However, it remains open whether these are coordinated by OEMs, retailers, or third-party loop operators (e.g., refurbishers). Literature rooted in the classic make-or-buy concept proposes four generic coordination mechanisms and related value creation architectures: vertical integration, network, outsourcing, or doing nothing (laissez-faire). For each of these existing architectures, we conducted an embedded case study in the domain of smartphones with the aim to better understand how central coordinators align with actors in the value chain to offer voluntary circular service operations. Based on the above coordination mechanisms, our central contribution is the development of a typology of circular value creation architectures (CVCAs) and its elaboration regarding circular coordination, loop configuration, and ambition levels. We find that firms following slowing strategies (i.e., repair, reuse, and remanufacturing) pursue higher degrees of vertical integration than those following closing strategies (i.e., recycling) because of the specificity of the assets involved and their greater strategic relevance. The typology also shows that higher degrees of vertical integration enable higher degrees of loop closure (i.e., from open to closed loops) and better feedbacks into product design. Furthermore, we differentiate the understanding on third-party actors by distinguishing between independent and autonomous loop operators. Overall, we strengthen the actor perspective in product circularity literature by clarifying the actor set, their interrelationships, and how they form value creation architectures.

AB - Slowing and closing product and related material loops in a circular economy (CE) requires circular service operations such as take-back, repair, and recycling. However, it remains open whether these are coordinated by OEMs, retailers, or third-party loop operators (e.g., refurbishers). Literature rooted in the classic make-or-buy concept proposes four generic coordination mechanisms and related value creation architectures: vertical integration, network, outsourcing, or doing nothing (laissez-faire). For each of these existing architectures, we conducted an embedded case study in the domain of smartphones with the aim to better understand how central coordinators align with actors in the value chain to offer voluntary circular service operations. Based on the above coordination mechanisms, our central contribution is the development of a typology of circular value creation architectures (CVCAs) and its elaboration regarding circular coordination, loop configuration, and ambition levels. We find that firms following slowing strategies (i.e., repair, reuse, and remanufacturing) pursue higher degrees of vertical integration than those following closing strategies (i.e., recycling) because of the specificity of the assets involved and their greater strategic relevance. The typology also shows that higher degrees of vertical integration enable higher degrees of loop closure (i.e., from open to closed loops) and better feedbacks into product design. Furthermore, we differentiate the understanding on third-party actors by distinguishing between independent and autonomous loop operators. Overall, we strengthen the actor perspective in product circularity literature by clarifying the actor set, their interrelationships, and how they form value creation architectures.

KW - business model innovation

KW - circular economy

KW - consumer electronics

KW - corporate sustainability

KW - partnerships

KW - product design

KW - business model innovation

KW - Circular economy

KW - consumer electronics

KW - corporate sustainability

KW - parnterships

KW - product design

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087155986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7f5c1ab8-e049-3391-ab79-dacefd0ef232/

U2 - 10.1111/jiec.13016

DO - 10.1111/jiec.13016

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85087155986

VL - 24

SP - 1250

EP - 1273

JO - Journal of Industrial Ecology

JF - Journal of Industrial Ecology

SN - 1088-1980

IS - 6

ER -

Documents

DOI