Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Slowing and closing product and related material loops in a circular economy (CE) requires circular service operations such as take-back, repair, and recycling. However, it remains open whether these are coordinated by OEMs, retailers, or third-party loop operators (e.g., refurbishers). Literature rooted in the classic make-or-buy concept proposes four generic coordination mechanisms and related value creation architectures: vertical integration, network, outsourcing, or doing nothing (laissez-faire). For each of these existing architectures, we conducted an embedded case study in the domain of smartphones with the aim to better understand how central coordinators align with actors in the value chain to offer voluntary circular service operations. Based on the above coordination mechanisms, our central contribution is the development of a typology of circular value creation architectures (CVCAs) and its elaboration regarding circular coordination, loop configuration, and ambition levels. We find that firms following slowing strategies (i.e., repair, reuse, and remanufacturing) pursue higher degrees of vertical integration than those following closing strategies (i.e., recycling) because of the specificity of the assets involved and their greater strategic relevance. The typology also shows that higher degrees of vertical integration enable higher degrees of loop closure (i.e., from open to closed loops) and better feedbacks into product design. Furthermore, we differentiate the understanding on third-party actors by distinguishing between independent and autonomous loop operators. Overall, we strengthen the actor perspective in product circularity literature by clarifying the actor set, their interrelationships, and how they form value creation architectures.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Industrial Ecology
Volume24
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1250-1273
Number of pages24
ISSN1088-1980
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12.2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Industrial Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Yale University

    Research areas

  • business model innovation, circular economy, consumer electronics, corporate sustainability, partnerships, product design
  • Sustainability Science

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Article 70 CISG
  2. Microstructure characterisation and creep properties of AE42 based hybrid composites prepared by squeeze casting process
  3. Expanding the pie or spoiling the cake? How the number of negotiation issues affects integrative bargaining
  4. Idiosyncratic volatility, option-based measures of informed trading, and investor attention
  5. Missing links
  6. The Timing of Daily Demand for Goods and Services
  7. Aspects of memory acts
  8. Going beyond certificates
  9. The power of putting a label on it
  10. Experimentally validated multi-step simulation strategy to predict the fatigue crack propagation rate in residual stress fields after laser shock peening
  11. Bridging scenario planning and backcasting
  12. Notation
  13. Introducing #PBAE
  14. Schreibt Ihr Unternehmen auch "grüne" Zahlen?
  15. Towards a theory of ethnic identity and migration
  16. One Fits Them All?
  17. Diversity Management and Corporate Change: Implications for Co-Determination
  18. Modeling, Identification, and Control for Cyber-Physical Systems Towards Industry 4.0
  19. Enhancing the transformative potential of interventions for the sustainable use of natural resources
  20. Nichtlineare Dynamik
  21. Tree diversity promotes functional dissimilarity and maintains functional richness despite species loss in predator assemblages
  22. Co-production of nature's contributions to people
  23. Pathways and mechanisms for catalyzing social impact through Orchestration: Insights from an open social innovation project
  24. Circular and inclusive utilization of alternative proteins
  25. The Role of Network Size for the Robustness of Centrality Measures
  26. Operation B
  27. Spatial Tests, Familiarity with the Surroundings, and Spatial Activity Experience