The impact of biodiversity information on willingness to pay

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Biodiversity loss is one of the planetary boundaries that is most urgently in need of action. However, very little is known about the consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for products with higher (or lower) levels of biodiversity performance. Therefore, this research was conducted to investigate how consumers’ WTP is influenced by a product's impact on biodiversity. To address this question, we collected representative data from 524 German consumers in a survey-based experiment. Drawing on prospect theory, we identified the shape of the WTP reaction function for a given product in relation to its biodiversity performance. We demonstrate that consumers with sufficiently high levels of education and concern about biodiversity loss are willing to pay more for products with above-average biodiversity performance and less for products with below-average biodiversity performance. However, the extent to which a product outperforms the industry average does not influence consumers’ increased WTP. From a sustainable development perspective, these observed patterns highlight the problematic contrast between the pressing need for substantial improvements in product biodiversity performance and the limited incentives provided by consumers. Consequently, the findings suggest that the incentives that consumers currently provide for corporate biodiversity management are insufficient to assist in staying within the planetary boundaries.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Industrial Ecology
Volume28
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1641-1656
Number of pages16
ISSN1088-1980
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12.2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Industrial Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Industrial Ecology.

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Handbook on life cycle sustainability assessment
  2. Wasserstoff
  3. Demographische Lage
  4. Travel pattern of the Asean students in Malaysia
  5. Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor
  6. Was ist Stakeholder Value?
  7. The Three Schools of CCO Thinking
  8. Cultural Leadership in Practice
  9. Der Agenda-Prozess an der Universität Lüneburg
  10. Im Epochenlosen
  11. Innovative public governance in times of crisis
  12. Consistent drivers of plant biodiversity across managed ecosystems
  13. The influence of agricultural system, stand structural complexity and landscape context on foraging birds in oil palm landscapes
  14. Wissenschaftstheorie
  15. Von Boccaccio zu Hartmut Lange
  16. Was haben ethische Prinzipien mit Konfliktregelung zu tun?
  17. Heisser Norden
  18. Teachers as change agents of sustainable development!?
  19. Business and Emissions Trading from a Public Choice Perspective
  20. Werturteil II
  21. MCG - Ein Modell zur Prognose der Identifikationszeiten für Objekte
  22. Terpenoids tame aggressors
  23. Von der Präsenzmasse zur statistischen Masse
  24. Juniorprofessuren - auch eine Chance in der universitären Personalstruktur?
  25. Say Something
  26. Zur Relevanz von Informationsasymmetrien bei "Lüneburger Bauherren"
  27. The reform of the German works constitution act
  28. The Psychology of Entrepreneurship
  29. Konzeption eines privaten Brachflächenfonds
  30. Pragmatik und Englischunterricht
  31. A comparison of feasible methods for microalgal biomass determinations during tertiary wastewater treatment
  32. Stimme der Kinder oder Stimmung in der Familie?
  33. Flächenfonds als öffentlich-private Partnerschaft