Building urban resilience through sustainability‑oriented small‑ and medium‑sized enterprises

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Sarah Burch
  • Jose DiBella
  • Arnim Wiek
  • Stefan Schaltegger
  • Wendy Stubbs
  • Megan Farrelly
  • Barry Ness
  • Kes McCormick
The unfolding COVID-19 pandemic, and the unprecedented social and economic costs it has inflicted, provide an important opportunity to scrutinize the interplay between the resilience of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the resilience of the communities they are embedded in. In this article, we articulate the specific ways that SMEs play a crucial, and underappreciated role in building resilience to human and natural hazards, and provide new opportunities to accelerate the adoption of sustainability practices through the configuration of ‘enabling ecosystems’ geared towards promoting sustainability in the private sector. We argue that capacity-building and experimentation are not only required within companies, but also throughout this emerging supportive ecosystem of policies, resources (i.e. finance, materials, skills), governance actors, and intermediaries to adequately focus investment, technical capabilities and innovation. Ultimately, we call for a new transdisciplinary action research agenda that centers on SMEs as pivotal actors and amplifiers of community resilience; while recognizing that these firms are themselves in need of support to secure their own capacity to respond to, and transform in light of, crises. This research program calls for recognizing and applying the lessons that the pandemic presents to the urgent need for accelerated climate action. This will be enabled by developing more targeted approaches to collaborative capacity-building activities in SMEs that feed into experimentation and allow for the accelerated adoption of deliberate and strategic resilient business practices and models.
Original languageEnglish
Article number12
JournalUrban Transformations
Volume4
Issue number1
Number of pages7
ISSN2524-8162
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28.07.2022

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2022.

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Tabea Eißing

Publications

  1. Introduction to Music and the Politics of Memory
  2. Jonathan Swift, A modest proposal for preventing the children of poor people of Ireland from beeing a burden to their parents or the country, and for making them beneficial to the public
  3. Trainingslehre - Aufwärmen : Stretchen: ja oder nein?
  4. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based and mobile stress-management intervention for employees
  5. Calendar
  6. Communicating effectively about CSR on Twitter
  7. Interpersonal conflicts in executive training
  8. Multi-level Governance, Policy Implementation and Participation
  9. Introduction
  10. Mapping Swap Rate Projections on Bond Yields Considering Cointegration
  11. Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes
  12. Demographic Transition in Rural Areas: The Relationship between Public Services and Tourism Development
  13. Catalysing Change in Higher Education for Sustainable Development
  14. Wozu KMU-Management
  15. Fallstudie
  16. SRI AND ENERGY TRANSFORMATION ON THE WAY TO SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVENESS
  17. Intra-industry adjustment to import competition
  18. Ten claims on behalf of technology
  19. Development of a magnesium recycling alloy based on the AM alloy system
  20. Extern berichten:
  21. Erratum zu
  22. Die Rechtschreibung beim Textschreiben
  23. Average wage, qualification of the workforce and export performance in German enterprises: evidence from KombiFiD data
  24. Governance approaches to address scale issues in biodiversity management – current situation and ways forward
  25. Akteure, Berater und Beobachter, oder: wie kommt Strategie in die Politik?
  26. Angels of Efficiency
  27. Best-Practice-Beispiel: Wie kann Mentoring in die neue Studienorganisation implementiert werden?
  28. From negative to positive sustainability performance measurement and assessment? A qualitative inquiry drawing on framing effects theory