Beyond the “local”: Methods for examining place attachment across geographic scales

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapter

Standard

Beyond the “local”: Methods for examining place attachment across geographic scales. / Raymond, Christopher; Gottwald, Sarah.
Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications. ed. / Lynne C. Manzo; Patrick Devine-Wright. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2020. p. 143-158 (Place Attachment).

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapter

Harvard

Raymond, C & Gottwald, S 2020, Beyond the “local”: Methods for examining place attachment across geographic scales. in LC Manzo & P Devine-Wright (eds), Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications. Place Attachment, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp. 143-158. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274442-9

APA

Raymond, C., & Gottwald, S. (2020). Beyond the “local”: Methods for examining place attachment across geographic scales. In L. C. Manzo, & P. Devine-Wright (Eds.), Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications (pp. 143-158). (Place Attachment). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274442-9

Vancouver

Raymond C, Gottwald S. Beyond the “local”: Methods for examining place attachment across geographic scales. In Manzo LC, Devine-Wright P, editors, Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2020. p. 143-158. (Place Attachment). doi: 10.4324/9780429274442-9

Bibtex

@inbook{df8c98d55abc40989dafe14af2c8f845,
title = "Beyond the “local”: Methods for examining place attachment across geographic scales",
abstract = "In this chapter, we outline and critically compare four major types of methods for assessing place attachment across geographic scales and then discuss future directions for methodological development concerning the interplay between the geographic and temporal variability of place attachment. We demonstrate that while there is general consensus that individuals are more attached to geographically and cognitively defined places, research on place attachment across geographic scales, particularly beyond the city scale, is underdeveloped and contains examples of mixed and sometimes contradictory findings. We present a conceptual framework for representing the spectrum of methods for assessing place attachment across geographic scales, and with reference to important related constructs of place values and place meanings.",
keywords = "Sustainability Governance, Environmental planning",
author = "Christopher Raymond and Sarah Gottwald",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "3",
doi = "10.4324/9780429274442-9",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780367223496",
series = "Place Attachment",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
pages = "143--158",
editor = "Manzo, {Lynne C.} and Patrick Devine-Wright",
booktitle = "Place Attachment",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Beyond the “local”

T2 - Methods for examining place attachment across geographic scales

AU - Raymond, Christopher

AU - Gottwald, Sarah

PY - 2020/11/3

Y1 - 2020/11/3

N2 - In this chapter, we outline and critically compare four major types of methods for assessing place attachment across geographic scales and then discuss future directions for methodological development concerning the interplay between the geographic and temporal variability of place attachment. We demonstrate that while there is general consensus that individuals are more attached to geographically and cognitively defined places, research on place attachment across geographic scales, particularly beyond the city scale, is underdeveloped and contains examples of mixed and sometimes contradictory findings. We present a conceptual framework for representing the spectrum of methods for assessing place attachment across geographic scales, and with reference to important related constructs of place values and place meanings.

AB - In this chapter, we outline and critically compare four major types of methods for assessing place attachment across geographic scales and then discuss future directions for methodological development concerning the interplay between the geographic and temporal variability of place attachment. We demonstrate that while there is general consensus that individuals are more attached to geographically and cognitively defined places, research on place attachment across geographic scales, particularly beyond the city scale, is underdeveloped and contains examples of mixed and sometimes contradictory findings. We present a conceptual framework for representing the spectrum of methods for assessing place attachment across geographic scales, and with reference to important related constructs of place values and place meanings.

KW - Sustainability Governance

KW - Environmental planning

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/14b58841-abd9-3cb7-94b7-11a5eba6ba08/

U2 - 10.4324/9780429274442-9

DO - 10.4324/9780429274442-9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780367223496

SN - 9780367223472

T3 - Place Attachment

SP - 143

EP - 158

BT - Place Attachment

A2 - Manzo, Lynne C.

A2 - Devine-Wright, Patrick

PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

CY - London

ER -

DOI