Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups. / Radke, Helena R.M.; Kutlaca, Maja; Siem, Birte et al.
In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.11.2020, p. 291-315.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Radke HRM, Kutlaca M, Siem B, Wright SC, Becker JC. Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2020 Nov 1;24(4):291-315. doi: 10.1177/1088868320918698

Bibtex

@article{ee90543ada6e4b4abc1d22636db05fec,
title = "Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups",
abstract = "White Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women{\textquoteright}s March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South—advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.",
keywords = "allies, collective action, motivations, protest, social change, Social Work and Social Pedagogics",
author = "Radke, {Helena R.M.} and Maja Kutlaca and Birte Siem and Wright, {Stephen C.} and Becker, {Julia C.}",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1088868320918698",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "291--315",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Review",
issn = "1088-8683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Allyship

T2 - Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups

AU - Radke, Helena R.M.

AU - Kutlaca, Maja

AU - Siem, Birte

AU - Wright, Stephen C.

AU - Becker, Julia C.

PY - 2020/11/1

Y1 - 2020/11/1

N2 - White Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women’s March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South—advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.

AB - White Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women’s March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South—advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.

KW - allies

KW - collective action

KW - motivations

KW - protest

KW - social change

KW - Social Work and Social Pedagogics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084509878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8879e36d-6481-38bb-b3fe-81872130eaea/

U2 - 10.1177/1088868320918698

DO - 10.1177/1088868320918698

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 32390573

AN - SCOPUS:85084509878

VL - 24

SP - 291

EP - 315

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Review

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Review

SN - 1088-8683

IS - 4

ER -

DOI