Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
in: Personality and Social Psychology Review, Jahrgang 24, Nr. 4, 01.11.2020, S. 291-315.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond Allyship
T2 - Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups
AU - Radke, Helena R.M.
AU - Kutlaca, Maja
AU - Siem, Birte
AU - Wright, Stephen C.
AU - Becker, Julia C.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - White Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women’s March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South—advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.
AB - White Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women’s March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South—advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.
KW - allies
KW - collective action
KW - motivations
KW - protest
KW - social change
KW - Social Work and Social Pedagogics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084509878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8879e36d-6481-38bb-b3fe-81872130eaea/
U2 - 10.1177/1088868320918698
DO - 10.1177/1088868320918698
M3 - Scientific review articles
C2 - 32390573
AN - SCOPUS:85084509878
VL - 24
SP - 291
EP - 315
JO - Personality and Social Psychology Review
JF - Personality and Social Psychology Review
SN - 1088-8683
IS - 4
ER -