All new and all outcome-based? The German qualifications framework and the persistence of national governance approaches

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

All new and all outcome-based? The German qualifications framework and the persistence of national governance approaches . / Gössling, Bernd.
In: Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 29, No. 5, 03.07.2016, p. 540-561.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{fab27c34aaee40cd8f11049f0a9eab76,
title = "All new and all outcome-based?: The German qualifications framework and the persistence of national governance approaches ",
abstract = "This article analyses the development of the first national qualifications framework in Germany (Deutscher Qualifikationsrahmen or DQR). In this case, a qualifications framework, which is supposedly outcome-based, had to be adapted to a highly input-oriented qualification system. This raises the question, how clashing claims and governance approaches can be joined? The study draws upon the assumption that the discourse on the DQR development is driven by cognitive constructions of relevant policy-makers and that these mental constructions can be uncovered by an in-depth analysis of discourse-related paperwork, such as proposals and drafts, as well as transcripts of interviews with key actors. The analysis bears empirical evidence that many collectively shared patterns of interpretations remain stable, even in the face of a quite drastic impetus to change. This is especially the case for patterns linked to the persistent input-based paradigm of governance. Furthermore, new patterns of interpretations are revealed, which support the rising legitimacy of instruments in line with outcome-oriented governance. Arguments for outcome-based governance are, moreover, an integral part of the policy discourses around the DQR and might lead to nuances of change for new and overhauled qualifications in the future.",
keywords = "Lifelong Learning, discourse analysis, educational policy, governance, implementation, qualifications frameworks",
author = "Bernd G{\"o}ssling",
year = "2016",
month = jul,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13639080.2014.998181",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "540--561",
journal = "Journal of Education and Work",
issn = "1363-9080",
publisher = "Brill Verlag",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - All new and all outcome-based?

T2 - The German qualifications framework and the persistence of national governance approaches

AU - Gössling, Bernd

PY - 2016/7/3

Y1 - 2016/7/3

N2 - This article analyses the development of the first national qualifications framework in Germany (Deutscher Qualifikationsrahmen or DQR). In this case, a qualifications framework, which is supposedly outcome-based, had to be adapted to a highly input-oriented qualification system. This raises the question, how clashing claims and governance approaches can be joined? The study draws upon the assumption that the discourse on the DQR development is driven by cognitive constructions of relevant policy-makers and that these mental constructions can be uncovered by an in-depth analysis of discourse-related paperwork, such as proposals and drafts, as well as transcripts of interviews with key actors. The analysis bears empirical evidence that many collectively shared patterns of interpretations remain stable, even in the face of a quite drastic impetus to change. This is especially the case for patterns linked to the persistent input-based paradigm of governance. Furthermore, new patterns of interpretations are revealed, which support the rising legitimacy of instruments in line with outcome-oriented governance. Arguments for outcome-based governance are, moreover, an integral part of the policy discourses around the DQR and might lead to nuances of change for new and overhauled qualifications in the future.

AB - This article analyses the development of the first national qualifications framework in Germany (Deutscher Qualifikationsrahmen or DQR). In this case, a qualifications framework, which is supposedly outcome-based, had to be adapted to a highly input-oriented qualification system. This raises the question, how clashing claims and governance approaches can be joined? The study draws upon the assumption that the discourse on the DQR development is driven by cognitive constructions of relevant policy-makers and that these mental constructions can be uncovered by an in-depth analysis of discourse-related paperwork, such as proposals and drafts, as well as transcripts of interviews with key actors. The analysis bears empirical evidence that many collectively shared patterns of interpretations remain stable, even in the face of a quite drastic impetus to change. This is especially the case for patterns linked to the persistent input-based paradigm of governance. Furthermore, new patterns of interpretations are revealed, which support the rising legitimacy of instruments in line with outcome-oriented governance. Arguments for outcome-based governance are, moreover, an integral part of the policy discourses around the DQR and might lead to nuances of change for new and overhauled qualifications in the future.

KW - Lifelong Learning

KW - discourse analysis

KW - educational policy

KW - governance

KW - implementation

KW - qualifications frameworks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921415135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13639080.2014.998181

DO - 10.1080/13639080.2014.998181

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 29

SP - 540

EP - 561

JO - Journal of Education and Work

JF - Journal of Education and Work

SN - 1363-9080

IS - 5

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Self-defence against terrorist attacks
  2. Einleitung
  3. Sex Differences in Double Poling Performance
  4. Comparing U.S. and German Cost Accounting Methods
  5. Habitual physical activity and its determinants - experiences from the perspective of children using wheelchairs
  6. Innovation in Continuing Engineering Education with focus on gender and non-traditional students' pathways
  7. A suite of multiplexed microsatellite loci for the ground beetle Abax parallelepipedus (Piller and Mitterpacher, 1783) (Coleoptera, Carabidae)
  8. Forest history from a single tree species perspective
  9. Foucault, Reader and Critic of Marx
  10. VIPs in der Lesesozialisation ?
  11. An in vitro test for corrosion and cytocompatibility of two magnesium alloys
  12. The impact of emotions, moods, and other affect-related variables on creativity, innovation and initiative
  13. CULTURAL TENSIONS AND VALUES-ACTION GAPS IN SUSTAINABILITY-ORIENTED INNOVATION
  14. Separating Cognitive and Content Domains in Mathematical Competence
  15. The justice dimension of sustainability
  16. How price path characteristics shape investment behavior
  17. Einleitung
  18. Der Zentrale Runde Tisch der DDR: Wortprotokoll und Dokumente
  19. Cycling at varying load
  20. Who’s afraid of the articles on state responsibility
  21. Migrant struggles and moral economies of subversion
  22. Comparison of different methods for the measurement of ammonia volatilization after urea application in Henan Province, China
  23. The impact of corporate governance on the pillars of corporate social performance and reporting: A review of archival research and implications for future research
  24. Treatment or Documentation? Pareto Optimality in the Physicians’ Time Allocation
  25. Internationaler Masterstudiengang 'Sustainable Development and Management'
  26. Gaming musical instruments.
  27. Panel Cointegration Testing in the Presence of a Time Trend
  28. Links between media communication and local perceptions of climate change in an indigenous society
  29. Sustainability learnings from the COVID-19 crisis
  30. The Schöningen Middle Pleistocene sequence: a broader perspective.
  31. Decentralized planning and control for assembly areas driven by Gentelligent® parts