A cross-scale assessment of productivity–diversity relationships

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Dylan Craven
  • Masha T. van der Sande
  • Carsten Meyer
  • Katharina Gerstner
  • Joanne M. Bennett
  • Darren P. Giling
  • Jes Hines
  • Helen R.P. Phillips
  • Felix May
  • Katherine H. Bannar-Martin
  • Jonathan M. Chase
  • Petr Keil

Aim: Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity vary across the globe, and considerable effort has been made to describe their relationships. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research has traditionally focused on how experimentally controlled species richness affects net primary productivity (S → NPP) at small spatial grains. In contrast, the influence of productivity on richness (NPP → S) has been explored at many grains in naturally assembled communities. Mismatches in spatial scale between approaches have fuelled debate about the strength and direction of biodiversity–productivity relationships. Here, we examine the direction and strength of the influence of productivity on diversity (NPP → S) and the influence of diversity on productivity (S → NPP) and how these vary across spatial grains. Location: Contiguous USA. Time period: 1999–2015. Major taxa studied: Woody species (angiosperms and gymnosperms). Methods: Using data from North American forests at grains from local (672 m2) to coarse spatial units (median area = 35,677 km2), we assess relationships between diversity and productivity using structural equation and random forest models, while accounting for variation in climate, environmental heterogeneity, management and forest age. Results: We show that relationships between S and NPP strengthen with spatial grain. Within each grain, S → NPP and NPP → S have similar magnitudes, meaning that processes underlying S → NPP and NPP → S either operate simultaneously or that one of them is real and the other is an artefact. At all spatial grains, S was one of the weakest predictors of forest productivity, which was largely driven by biomass, temperature and forest management and age. Main conclusions: We conclude that spatial grain mediates relationships between biodiversity and productivity in real-world ecosystems and that results supporting predictions from each approach (NPP → S and S → NPP) serve as an impetus for future studies testing underlying mechanisms. Productivity–diversity relationships emerge at multiple spatial grains, which should widen the focus of national and global policy and research to larger spatial grains.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
Volume29
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1940-1955
Number of pages16
ISSN1466-822X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.11.2020

Bibliographical note

All authors recognize support from the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig (DFG‐FZT 118). M.T.v.d.S. is supported by the Rubicon research programme with project number 019.171LW.023, which is financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). C.M. acknowledges funding from the Volkswagen Foundation through a Freigeist Fellowship. We thank John Kartesz and Misako Nishino for generously providing access to BONAP data. We thank David Currie and Antonin Machac for initial discussions and Christian Wirth, Katie Barry, Nico Eisenhauer, Stan Harpole, Miguel Mahecha and the CAFE discussion group for their suggestions to improve analyses. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

    Research areas

  • biodiversity–ecosystem function, biomass, climate, machine learning, more individuals hypothesis, spatial grain, species–energy relationship
  • Ecosystems Research

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Impact assessment of emissions stabilization scenarios with and without induced technological change
  2. Process Analyses of Grounding in Chat-based CSCL
  3. Export Boosting Policies and Firm Performance
  4. Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions?
  5. New developments in space technology
  6. Conception and analysis of Cascaded Dual Kalman Filters as virtual sensors for mastication activity of stomatognathic craniomandibular system
  7. Wie lang sollte eine Rollstuhlrampe sein?
  8. Heterogenitätssensible Hochschullehre
  9. Who’s afraid of the senses? Organization, management and the return of the sensorium
  10. A transdisciplinary evaluation framework for the assessment of integration in boundary-crossing collaborations in teacher education
  11. Robust Control as a Mathematical Paradigm for Innovative Engineering Applications
  12. Calculation of Physicochemical Properties for Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins
  13. Hommage to the unknown viewers
  14. An indirectly controlled high-speed servo valve for IC engines using piezo actuators
  15. Me and AAC - Alternative and Augmented Communication in West Germany from a Biographical and Media Archaeological Perspective
  16. Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
  17. Approaches and Lessons in Political Career Research
  18. Benchmarking question answering systems
  19. Mobilität
  20. Navigating in the Digital Jungle: Articulating Combinatory Affordances of Digital Infrastructures for Collaboration
  21. Design for the triple topline
  22. X Machina and the World of Tomorrow
  23. Lecture2Go
  24. An Indirectly Controlled Full Variable Valve Train System to Improve the Internal Combustion Phase Engines
  25. Nanoindentation of Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Nanofibers by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)
  26. A Theory-Based Teaching Concept To Embed Sustainability In The Engineering Curriculum
  27. Planar multipole resonance probe
  28. It Matters to Whom You Compare Yourself
  29. Cyclic and non-cyclic crew rostering problems in public bus transit
  30. Effects of different video- or text-based reflection stimuli on pre-service teachers’ emotions, immersion, cognitive load and knowledge-based reasoning