Social-Ecological Systems Institute (SESI)
Organisational unit: Institute
Organisation profile
Vision & Mission
We envision a fair world where the benefits generated within social-ecological systems are shared sustainably with other species, both within and across generations. Solutions to sustainability challenges are developed collaboratively across diverse scientific disciplines, knowledge systems, and social interests. To realise our vision, we recognise the need for transformative change. In pursuit of such change we:
- use place-based social-ecological systems thinking to understand and resolve sustainability challenges such as biodiversity loss and environmental injustice;
- bring together insights and approaches from the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities in genuinely collaborative endeavours;
- integrate experiences, practices, and understandings from diverse knowledge systems;
- embed tools for transformative change into the social-ecological systems thinking via a leverage points perspective;
- develop and apply methods to bridge multiple scales and governance levels; and
- provide spaces for people sharing our vision to meet and exchange ideas.
Main research areas
We primarily conduct integrative and transdisciplinary research. In particular, the following topics are central to the Institute's research work:
- Biodiversity conservation
- Biocultural diversity
- Cross-scale governance
- Leverage points & transformation
- Ecosystem services
- Relational values
- Environmental justice
- Published
Natur schützen – Natur nutzen: Sozial-ökologische Perspektiven auf Biosphärenreservate
Mölders, T., 06.2012, In: Natur und Landschaft. 87, 6, p. 266-270 5 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
- Published
Academia's obsession with quantity
Fischer, J., Ritchie, E. G. & Hanspach, J., 01.09.2012, In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 27, 9, p. 473-474 2 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research
- Published
Fürsorgerationalität statt Wachstumslogik: Das Konzept der Green Economy aus feministischer Care-Perspektive
Gottschlich, D., 2012, In: Forum Wissenschaft. 29, 2, p. 17-20 4 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research
- Published
Supporting wild pollinators in a temperate agricultural landscape: Maintaining mosaics of natural features and production
Lentini, P. E., Martin, T., Gibbons, P., Fischer, J. & Cunningham, S. A., 05.2012, In: Biological Conservation. 149, 1, p. 84-92 9 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
- Published
Grundlage allen Wirtschaftens. Care: feministische Kritik an den marktwirtschaftlichen Verwertungszwängen von Sorge- und Versorgungsarbeit
Gottschlich, D., 2012, In: Frauenrat. 2, p. 3-4 2 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Transfer
- Published
Global assessment of the non-equilibrium concept in rangelands
Wehrden, H. V., Hanspach, J., Kaczensky, P., Fischer, J. & Wesche, K., 03.2012, In: Ecological Applications. 22, 2, p. 393-399 7 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
- Published
Raum- und Umweltplanung
Hofmeister, S., 2004, Zeitpolitisches Glossar: Grundbegriffe - Felder - Instrumente - Strategien. Heitkötter, M. & Schneider, M. (eds.). München: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Zeitpolitik e.V., p. 55-56 2 p.Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Articles for encyclopedia › Research
- Published
Weshalb der Nachhaltigkeitsdiskurs in Deutschland eine „Mutter“ hat. Ein festliches Essay für Christiane Busch-Lüty
Hofmeister, S., Biesecker, A., Seidl, I. & von Winterfeld , U., 2006, München: oekom verlag GmbH. 8 p.Research output: Books and anthologies › Collected editions and anthologies › Research
- Published
Wirtschaften in Netzen
Lang, F. J., Schrader, R. & Burandt, A., 2012, In: Unsere Wirtschaft. 63, 03/2012, p. 20-22 3 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Transfer
- Published
Wie gesellschaftsfähig ist Natur? Warum der Elbe-Biber nicht Männchen macht
Mölders, T., 2011, Wissenschaft verstehen: die Preisträger des Wettbewerbs 2010. Hufe, S. (ed.). München: oekom verlag GmbH, p. 19-21 3 p. (Sonderveröffentlichung der Zeitschrift GAIA - Ökologische Perspektiven für Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft).Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Transfer › peer-review