Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

  • Ellen-Marie Forsberg
  • Frank O. Anthun
  • Sharon Bailey
  • Giles Birchley
  • Henriette Bout
  • Carlo Casonato
  • Gloria Gonzalez Fuster
  • Bert Heinrichs
  • Serge Horbach
  • Ingrid Skjaeggestad Jacobsen
  • Jacques Janssen
  • Matthias Kaiser
  • Inge Lerouge
  • Barend van der Meulen
  • Sarah de Rijcke
  • Margit Sutrop
  • Marta Tazewell
  • Krista Varantola
  • Knut Jorgen Vie
  • Hub Zwart
  • Mira Zoeller

This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues:§ 1.Providing information about research integrity§ 2.Providing education, training and mentoring§ 3.Strengthening a research integrity culture§ 4.Facilitating open dialogue§ 5.Wise incentive management§ 6.Implementing quality assurance procedures§ 7.Improving the work environment and work satisfaction§ 8.Increasing transparency of misconduct cases§ 9.Opening up research§ 10.Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels§ 11.Protecting the alleged perpetrators§ 12.Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson§ 13.Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrity.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftScience and Engineering Ethics
Jahrgang24
Ausgabenummer4
Seiten (von - bis)1023-1034
Anzahl der Seiten12
ISSN1353-3452
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 01.08.2018

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s).

Zugehörige Aktivitäten

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Increasing the accuracy and efficiency of wildlife census with unmanned aerial vehicles
  2. PSYCHODRAMA AND SOCIOMETRY AS COUNSELING AND THERAPY METHODS IN OPEN GROUPS OF ALCOHOLICS
  3. Non-native Douglas fir promotes epigeal spider density, but has a mixed effect on functional diversity
  4. Nothing lasts forever: Dominant species decline under rapid environmental change in global grasslands
  5. Schulleitungsmonitor Schweiz 2022
  6. The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management
  7. Laser in situ keratomileusis
  8. Which attributes of audit committees are most beneficial for European companies?
  9. Konflikt
  10. Futures loss, despair and empowerment work in the University of Vechta: an action research project
  11. With a little help from my website. Firm survival and web presence in times of COVID-19 - Evidence from 10 European countries
  12. Genau wahrnehmen - differenziert fördern
  13. Analyzing non-linear dynamics of organic growth: evidence from small german new ventures
  14. Non-sterile fermentation of food waste with indigenous consortium and yeast – Effects on microbial community and product spectrum
  15. Achieving high mechanical performance of the large-scale sand-casting Mg–4Y–x nd–y Gd–0.4Zr alloys by tailoring Nd and Gd contents
  16. Valuing electronic devices? User narratives and their role for durability
  17. Toward a Kaleidoscopic Understanding of Anonymity
  18. Adaptive Lehrerinterventionen beim mathematischen Modellieren
  19. Ambiguous Effects of Risk Aversion on Healthy Nutrition
  20. Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship
  21. Peacekeeping Operations in Outer Space
  22. Meditating for the Planet
  23. Editorial
  24. A review of FEM code accuracy for reliable extrusion process analysis