1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. When status differences are illegitimate...
  6. Formate
  7. //

When status differences are illegitimate, groups' needs diverge: Testing the needs-based model of reconciliation in contexts of status inequality

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

When status differences are illegitimate, groups' needs diverge: Testing the needs-based model of reconciliation in contexts of status inequality. / Siem, Birte; von Oettingen, Maria; Mummendey, Amélie et al.
in: European Journal of Social Psychology, Jahrgang 43, Nr. 2, 03.2013, S. 137-148.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Siem, B, von Oettingen, M, Mummendey, A & Nadler, A 2013, 'When status differences are illegitimate, groups' needs diverge: Testing the needs-based model of reconciliation in contexts of status inequality', European Journal of Social Psychology, Jg. 43, Nr. 2, S. 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1929

APA

Siem, B., von Oettingen, M., Mummendey, A., & Nadler, A. (2013). When status differences are illegitimate, groups' needs diverge: Testing the needs-based model of reconciliation in contexts of status inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1929

Vancouver

Siem B, von Oettingen M, Mummendey A, Nadler A. When status differences are illegitimate, groups' needs diverge: Testing the needs-based model of reconciliation in contexts of status inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2013 Mär;43(2):137-148. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1929

Bibtex

@article{66f107817d20436cb0bba12a7692da6d,
title = "When status differences are illegitimate, groups' needs diverge: Testing the needs-based model of reconciliation in contexts of status inequality",
abstract = "The present paper extends the needs-based model of reconciliation to contexts marked by status inequalities rather than by overt intergroup aggression. Specifically, we investigated whether and when members of high-status versus low-status groups experience divergent socio-emotional needs vis-{\`a}-vis members of the respective other status group. Building on research informed by social identity theory, we hypothesized that the groups' different positions in the social hierarchy only translate into divergent needs when the status differences are perceived as illegitimate. In Study 1 (N=130), we tested this prediction by manipulating status and perceived legitimacy of status differences in a setting with artificially created groups. Results confirmed that the need to be socially accepted by members of the other status group was stronger in high-status compared with low-status group members but, as expected, only when the status differences were perceived to be illegitimate. Also as predicted, the need to be empowered by the other status group was stronger in low-status compared with high-status group members, again only under conditions of illegitimate status differences. Study 2 (N=169) further corroborated our perspective by replicating these findings in a naturalistic intergroup context. Implications for the role of legitimacy perceptions in determining differential socio-emotional needs and for the promotion of sustainable social change are discussed.",
keywords = "Social Work and Social Pedagogics",
author = "Birte Siem and {von Oettingen}, Maria and Am{\'e}lie Mummendey and Arie Nadler",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.1929",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "137--148",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When status differences are illegitimate, groups' needs diverge

T2 - Testing the needs-based model of reconciliation in contexts of status inequality

AU - Siem, Birte

AU - von Oettingen, Maria

AU - Mummendey, Amélie

AU - Nadler, Arie

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The present paper extends the needs-based model of reconciliation to contexts marked by status inequalities rather than by overt intergroup aggression. Specifically, we investigated whether and when members of high-status versus low-status groups experience divergent socio-emotional needs vis-à-vis members of the respective other status group. Building on research informed by social identity theory, we hypothesized that the groups' different positions in the social hierarchy only translate into divergent needs when the status differences are perceived as illegitimate. In Study 1 (N=130), we tested this prediction by manipulating status and perceived legitimacy of status differences in a setting with artificially created groups. Results confirmed that the need to be socially accepted by members of the other status group was stronger in high-status compared with low-status group members but, as expected, only when the status differences were perceived to be illegitimate. Also as predicted, the need to be empowered by the other status group was stronger in low-status compared with high-status group members, again only under conditions of illegitimate status differences. Study 2 (N=169) further corroborated our perspective by replicating these findings in a naturalistic intergroup context. Implications for the role of legitimacy perceptions in determining differential socio-emotional needs and for the promotion of sustainable social change are discussed.

AB - The present paper extends the needs-based model of reconciliation to contexts marked by status inequalities rather than by overt intergroup aggression. Specifically, we investigated whether and when members of high-status versus low-status groups experience divergent socio-emotional needs vis-à-vis members of the respective other status group. Building on research informed by social identity theory, we hypothesized that the groups' different positions in the social hierarchy only translate into divergent needs when the status differences are perceived as illegitimate. In Study 1 (N=130), we tested this prediction by manipulating status and perceived legitimacy of status differences in a setting with artificially created groups. Results confirmed that the need to be socially accepted by members of the other status group was stronger in high-status compared with low-status group members but, as expected, only when the status differences were perceived to be illegitimate. Also as predicted, the need to be empowered by the other status group was stronger in low-status compared with high-status group members, again only under conditions of illegitimate status differences. Study 2 (N=169) further corroborated our perspective by replicating these findings in a naturalistic intergroup context. Implications for the role of legitimacy perceptions in determining differential socio-emotional needs and for the promotion of sustainable social change are discussed.

KW - Social Work and Social Pedagogics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875239255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.1929

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.1929

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84875239255

VL - 43

SP - 137

EP - 148

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 2

ER -

In der gleichen Zeitschrift

Effects of diversity versus segregation on automatic approach and avoidance behavior towards own and other ethnic groups

Degner, J., Essien, I. & Reichardt, R., 01.10.2016, in: European Journal of Social Psychology. 46, 6, S. 783-791 9 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups

Essien, I., Otten, S. & Degner, J., 10.2020, in: European Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 6, S. 1108-1124 17 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Country-level and individual-level predictors of men's support for gender equality in 42 countries

Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Besta, T., Bosson, J. K., Jurek, P., Vandello, J. A., Best, D. L., Wlodarczyk, A., Safdar, S., Zawisza, M., Żadkowska, M., Sobiecki, J., Agyemang, C. B., Akbaş, G., Ammirati, S., Anderson, J., Anjum, G., Aruta, J. J. B. R., Ashraf, M., Bakaitytė, A., Bi, C., Becker, M., Bender, M., Bërxulli, D., Bosak, J., Daalmans, S., Dandy, J., de Lemus, S., Dvorianchikov, N., Etchezahar, E., Froehlich, L., Gavreliuc, A., Gavreliuc, D., Gomez, Á., Greijdanus, H., Grigoryan, A., Hale, M. L., Hämer, H., Hoorens, V., Hutchings, P. B., Jensen, D. H., Kelmendi, K., Khachatryan, N., Kinahan, M., Kozlowski, D., Lauri, M. A., Li, J., Maitner, A. T., Makashvili, A., Mancini, T., Martiny, S. E., Đorđević, J. M., Moreno-Bella, E., Moscatelli, S., Bryan Moynihan, A., Muller, D., Ochoa, D., Adebayo, S. O., Pacilli, M. G., Palacio, J., Patnaik, S., Pavlopoulos, V., Piterová, I., Puzio, A., Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Rentería-Pérez, E., Rousseaux, T., Sainz, M., Salvati, M., Samekin, A., García-Sánchez, E., Schindler, S., Sherbaji, S., Sobhie, R., Sulejmanović, D., Sullivan, K. E., Torre, B., Torres, C. V., Ungaretti, J., Valshtein, T., Van Laar, C., van der Noll, J., Vasiutynskyi, V., Vohra, N., Zapata-Calvente, A. L. & Žukauskienė, R., 01.10.2020, in: European Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 6, S. 1276-1291 16 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries

Brandt, M. J., Kuppens, T., Spears, R., Andrighetto, L., Autin, F., Babincak, P., Badea, C., Bae, J., Batruch, A., Becker, J. C., Bocian, K., Bodroža, B., Bourguignon, D., Bukowski, M., Butera, F., Butler, S. E., Chryssochoou, X., Conway, P., Crawford, J. T., Croizet, J. C., de Lemus, S., Degner, J., Dragon, P., Durante, F., Easterbrook, M. J., Essien, I., Forgas, J. P., González, R., Graf, S., Halama, P., Han, G., Hong, R. Y., Houdek, P., Igou, E. R., Inbar, Y., Jetten, J., Jimenez Leal, W., Jiménez-Moya, G., Karunagharan, J. K., Kende, A., Korzh, M., Laham, S. M., Lammers, J., Lim, L., Manstead, A. S. R., Međedović, J., Melton, Z. J., Motyl, M., Ntani, S., Owuamalam, C. K., Peker, M., Platow, M. J., Prims, J. P., Reyna, C., Rubin, M., Saab, R., Sankaran, S., Shepherd, L., Sibley, C. G., Sobkow, A., Spruyt, B., Stroebaek, P., Sümer, N., Sweetman, J., Teixeira, C. P., Toma, C., Ujhelyi, A., van der Toorn, J., van Hiel, A., Vásquez-Echeverría, A., Vazquez, A., Vianello, M., Vranka, M., Yzerbyt, V. & Zimmerman, J. L., 01.08.2020, in: European Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 5, S. 921-942 22 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Antecedents and consequences of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help toward refugees

Becker, J. C., Ksenofontov, I., Siem, B. & Love, A., 06.2019, in: European Journal of Social Psychology. 49, 4, S. 831-838 8 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Key experiences of volunteers in Refugee Aid

Landmann, H., Siem, B., Fuchs, B. & Rohmann, A., 27.07.2023, (Elektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung) in: Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies. 16 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions

Gender Audits Forecasting Collaboration, Schaerer, M., Plessis, C. D., Nguyen, M. H. B., Aert, R. C. M. V., Tiokhin, L., Lakens, D., Clemente, E. G., Pfeiffer, T., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Clark, C. J. & Siem, B., 01.11.2023, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 179, 26 S., 104280.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

„Weiß und gebildet?“ Auf dem Weg zu einer divers(er)en Klimaschutzbewegung

Siem, B. & Essien, I., 2023, in: In-Mind Magazin. 4

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Transfer › begutachtet

Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized

Becker, J. C., Wright, S. C. & Siem, B., 03.2022, in: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology. 29, 1 Special Issue, S. 123-139 17 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Social Support in Online Peer Groups for Celiac Disease

Köstlin, D., Siem, B. & Rohmann, A., 01.07.2023, in: European Journal of Health Psychology. 30, 3, S. 138-143 6 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI