‘Void’ democrats? The populist notion of ‘democracy’ in action

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

‘Void’ democrats? The populist notion of ‘democracy’ in action. / Schwörer, Jakob; Koß, Michael.
in: Party Politics, 13.09.2023.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5ed09f8abce84beab7c86f830551f0e4,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Void{\textquoteright} democrats? The populist notion of {\textquoteleft}democracy{\textquoteright} in action",
abstract = "Populism is often seen as a threat to liberal democracy because of its rejection of constitutional constraints and emphasis on popular sovereignty. Others argue that populism is a corrective to mainstream politics and not necessarily anti-democratic. While the relationship between populism and democracy is widely debated in theory and empirically assessed by estimating the effect of populist rule, we analyse discursive references to democracy in election manifestos and tweets of populist radical right (PRRP) and populist radical left (PRLP) parties in seven Western European countries. By mapping populists{\textquoteright} discourses on democracy across electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative and egalitarian dimensions, we find that PRLP elaborate a more coherent understanding of democracy (especially its participatory and egalitarian dimensions) and do not reject any dimension. PRRP hardly elaborate on any dimension except participation. PRRP appear as {\textquoteleft}void{\textquoteright} democrats with ambivalent and incoherent credentials, which at times reject and instrumentalise democracy.",
keywords = "Politics, Western Europe, content analysis, democracy, political parties, populism",
author = "Jakob Schw{\"o}rer and Michael Ko{\ss}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023.",
year = "2023",
month = sep,
day = "13",
doi = "10.1177/13540688231200992",
language = "English",
journal = "Party Politics",
issn = "1354-0688",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Void’ democrats? The populist notion of ‘democracy’ in action

AU - Schwörer, Jakob

AU - Koß, Michael

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.

PY - 2023/9/13

Y1 - 2023/9/13

N2 - Populism is often seen as a threat to liberal democracy because of its rejection of constitutional constraints and emphasis on popular sovereignty. Others argue that populism is a corrective to mainstream politics and not necessarily anti-democratic. While the relationship between populism and democracy is widely debated in theory and empirically assessed by estimating the effect of populist rule, we analyse discursive references to democracy in election manifestos and tweets of populist radical right (PRRP) and populist radical left (PRLP) parties in seven Western European countries. By mapping populists’ discourses on democracy across electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative and egalitarian dimensions, we find that PRLP elaborate a more coherent understanding of democracy (especially its participatory and egalitarian dimensions) and do not reject any dimension. PRRP hardly elaborate on any dimension except participation. PRRP appear as ‘void’ democrats with ambivalent and incoherent credentials, which at times reject and instrumentalise democracy.

AB - Populism is often seen as a threat to liberal democracy because of its rejection of constitutional constraints and emphasis on popular sovereignty. Others argue that populism is a corrective to mainstream politics and not necessarily anti-democratic. While the relationship between populism and democracy is widely debated in theory and empirically assessed by estimating the effect of populist rule, we analyse discursive references to democracy in election manifestos and tweets of populist radical right (PRRP) and populist radical left (PRLP) parties in seven Western European countries. By mapping populists’ discourses on democracy across electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative and egalitarian dimensions, we find that PRLP elaborate a more coherent understanding of democracy (especially its participatory and egalitarian dimensions) and do not reject any dimension. PRRP hardly elaborate on any dimension except participation. PRRP appear as ‘void’ democrats with ambivalent and incoherent credentials, which at times reject and instrumentalise democracy.

KW - Politics

KW - Western Europe

KW - content analysis

KW - democracy

KW - political parties

KW - populism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171278494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2d019652-b64e-31e7-a025-2057b2a3db63/

U2 - 10.1177/13540688231200992

DO - 10.1177/13540688231200992

M3 - Journal articles

JO - Party Politics

JF - Party Politics

SN - 1354-0688

ER -

DOI