Timing, fragmentation of work and income inequality: an earnings treatment effects approach

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Standard

Timing, fragmentation of work and income inequality: an earnings treatment effects approach. / Merz, Joachim; Boehm, Paul; Burgert, Derik.
Lüneburg: Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe, 2005. (FFB Discussion Paper ; Nr. 48).

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Harvard

Merz, J, Boehm, P & Burgert, D 2005 'Timing, fragmentation of work and income inequality: an earnings treatment effects approach' FFB Discussion Paper , Nr. 48, Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe, Lüneburg.

APA

Vancouver

Merz J, Boehm P, Burgert D. Timing, fragmentation of work and income inequality: an earnings treatment effects approach. Lüneburg: Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe. 2005 Jan. (FFB Discussion Paper ; 48).

Bibtex

@techreport{b12af84838c6447cbe0e0fccac80b038,
title = "Timing, fragmentation of work and income inequality: an earnings treatment effects approach",
abstract = "Traditional welfare analyses based on money income needs to be broadened by its time dimension. In the course of time the traditional full-time work is diminishing and new labour arrangements are discussed (keyword: flexible labour markets). Our study is contributing to economic well-being by adding insights into particular work effort characteristics - the daily timing of work and its fragmentation - and its resulting income distribution. With our focus on 'who is working when within a day with which earnings consequences' we go beyond traditional labour market analyses with its working time division into aggregated full and part time work, working hours spread across a week and weekend, life time working etc. Whereas the first part of our study is describing the distribution of timing and fragmentation of daily work time and its resulting income based on more than 35.000 diaries of the recent German Time Budget Survey 2001/2002, the second part of our study quantifies determinants of arrangement specific earnings functions detecting significant explanatory pattern of what is behind. The economic theory behind is a human capital approach in a market and non-market context, extended by non-market time use, the partner's working condition, social networking as well as household and regional characteristics. The econometrics use a treatment effects type interdependent estimation of endogenous participation (selection) in a daily working hour pattern (self-selection)and pattern specific earnings function explanation. The overall result: Individual earnings in Germany are dependent on and significant different with regard to the daily working hour arrangement capturing timing and fragmentation of work time. Market and non-market factors are important and significant in explaining earnings.",
keywords = "Economics, time use and inequality, timing and fragmentation of work time, working hour arrangements, labour supply, earnings explanation, human capital, market and non-market time use, time use diary data, treatment effects modelling, endogenous self-selection, German time budget survey 2001/2002",
author = "Joachim Merz and Paul Boehm and Derik Burgert",
note = "Literaturverz. S. 36 - 38",
year = "2005",
month = jan,
language = "English",
series = "FFB Discussion Paper ",
publisher = "Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe",
number = "48",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Timing, fragmentation of work and income inequality

T2 - an earnings treatment effects approach

AU - Merz, Joachim

AU - Boehm, Paul

AU - Burgert, Derik

N1 - Literaturverz. S. 36 - 38

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Traditional welfare analyses based on money income needs to be broadened by its time dimension. In the course of time the traditional full-time work is diminishing and new labour arrangements are discussed (keyword: flexible labour markets). Our study is contributing to economic well-being by adding insights into particular work effort characteristics - the daily timing of work and its fragmentation - and its resulting income distribution. With our focus on 'who is working when within a day with which earnings consequences' we go beyond traditional labour market analyses with its working time division into aggregated full and part time work, working hours spread across a week and weekend, life time working etc. Whereas the first part of our study is describing the distribution of timing and fragmentation of daily work time and its resulting income based on more than 35.000 diaries of the recent German Time Budget Survey 2001/2002, the second part of our study quantifies determinants of arrangement specific earnings functions detecting significant explanatory pattern of what is behind. The economic theory behind is a human capital approach in a market and non-market context, extended by non-market time use, the partner's working condition, social networking as well as household and regional characteristics. The econometrics use a treatment effects type interdependent estimation of endogenous participation (selection) in a daily working hour pattern (self-selection)and pattern specific earnings function explanation. The overall result: Individual earnings in Germany are dependent on and significant different with regard to the daily working hour arrangement capturing timing and fragmentation of work time. Market and non-market factors are important and significant in explaining earnings.

AB - Traditional welfare analyses based on money income needs to be broadened by its time dimension. In the course of time the traditional full-time work is diminishing and new labour arrangements are discussed (keyword: flexible labour markets). Our study is contributing to economic well-being by adding insights into particular work effort characteristics - the daily timing of work and its fragmentation - and its resulting income distribution. With our focus on 'who is working when within a day with which earnings consequences' we go beyond traditional labour market analyses with its working time division into aggregated full and part time work, working hours spread across a week and weekend, life time working etc. Whereas the first part of our study is describing the distribution of timing and fragmentation of daily work time and its resulting income based on more than 35.000 diaries of the recent German Time Budget Survey 2001/2002, the second part of our study quantifies determinants of arrangement specific earnings functions detecting significant explanatory pattern of what is behind. The economic theory behind is a human capital approach in a market and non-market context, extended by non-market time use, the partner's working condition, social networking as well as household and regional characteristics. The econometrics use a treatment effects type interdependent estimation of endogenous participation (selection) in a daily working hour pattern (self-selection)and pattern specific earnings function explanation. The overall result: Individual earnings in Germany are dependent on and significant different with regard to the daily working hour arrangement capturing timing and fragmentation of work time. Market and non-market factors are important and significant in explaining earnings.

KW - Economics

KW - time use and inequality

KW - timing and fragmentation of work time

KW - working hour arrangements

KW - labour supply

KW - earnings explanation

KW - human capital

KW - market and non-market time use

KW - time use diary data

KW - treatment effects modelling

KW - endogenous self-selection

KW - German time budget survey 2001/2002

M3 - Working papers

T3 - FFB Discussion Paper

BT - Timing, fragmentation of work and income inequality

PB - Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe

CY - Lüneburg

ER -

Dokumente